Suppr超能文献

微笑吸引力的形态特征及相关因素影响感知和牙龈美学参数。

Morphological features of smile attractiveness and related factors influence perception and gingival aesthetic parameters.

机构信息

Division of Odonto-Stomatology, School of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Division of Odonto-Stomatology, School of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

出版信息

Int Dent J. 2022 Feb;72(1):67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2021.02.001. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In addition to understanding the basic standards of a smile and patient's opinion, dentists should take into account smile aesthetics, an essential factor for optimal outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the factors that affect the perception of an aesthetic smile and determine its morphological characteristics and measure the gingival aesthetic parameters.

METHODS

In all, 200 Vietnamese aged 18-35 years were recruited to have their spontaneous smiles captured. These smile images were assessed by 50 laypersons and 50 dentists using a visual analogue scale measurement. The images were analysed to evaluate perceptions of evaluators, determine smile attractiveness, and measure gingival aesthetics.

RESULTS

The difference in the judgements of laypersons and dentists, males and females, and laypersons aged 18-25 and 26-35 years were nonsignificant. High or average anterior smile line, parallel smile arc, upward upper lip curvature, second premolars as the posterior-most teeth displayed, smile index of 5.23-5.63, and dynamic smile symmetry of 1 were scored highly on smile attractiveness. The following maxillary gingival aesthetic parameters were preferred: gingival zenith (GZ) of the canine 0.72-0.75 mm apical to the GZ of the central incisor; GZ of the lateral incisor 0.66 mm coronal to the gingival line; gingival line angle of ∼87°; for the central incisor, lateral incisor, and canines, distance from the GZ to the long axis of 1, 0.4, and 0 mm, respectively; interdental papilla height of 4.25, 3.60, and 3.85 mm, respectively; ratio of the distance from the GZ and the interdental papilla tip to the incisal edge of ∼1.74-1.77 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors including profession, gender, and age of evaluators had almost no impact on their perception of aesthetics. Smile attractiveness characteristics and gingival aesthetic parameters have clinical applicability for patient care.

摘要

简介

除了了解微笑的基本标准和患者的意见外,牙医还应考虑微笑美学,这是获得最佳效果的关键因素。本研究旨在评估影响审美微笑感知的因素,确定其形态特征,并测量牙龈美学参数。

方法

共招募了 200 名年龄在 18-35 岁的越南人,让他们自然微笑并拍照。50 名非专业人士和 50 名牙医使用视觉模拟量表对这些微笑图像进行评估。对图像进行分析,以评估评估者的感知、确定微笑吸引力,并测量牙龈美学。

结果

非专业人士和牙医、男性和女性以及 18-25 岁和 26-35 岁的非专业人士之间的判断差异无统计学意义。高或平均前牙微笑线、平行的微笑弧、向上的上唇曲线、显示的第二前磨牙作为最后一颗后牙、微笑指数为 5.23-5.63 和动态微笑对称性为 1 分,在微笑吸引力方面得分较高。以下上颌牙龈美学参数较受欢迎:尖牙的牙龈顶点(GZ)比中切牙的 GZ 高 0.72-0.75mm;侧切牙的 GZ 比牙龈线高 0.66mm;牙龈线角约为 87°;对于中切牙、侧切牙和尖牙,从 GZ 到长轴的距离分别为 1、0.4 和 0mm;牙间乳头高度分别为 4.25、3.60 和 3.85mm;从 GZ 到牙间乳头尖端与切缘的距离之比约为 1.74-1.77mm。

结论

评估者的职业、性别和年龄等因素对他们的审美感知几乎没有影响。微笑吸引力特征和牙龈美学参数对患者护理具有临床适用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc1a/9275111/7872fcb51e71/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验