Suppr超能文献

2 型糖尿病亚组、并发症风险以及强化生活方式干预的差异效应。

Type 2 Diabetes Subgroups, Risk for Complications, and Differential Effects Due to an Intensive Lifestyle Intervention.

机构信息

Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC

Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2021 May;44(5):1203-1210. doi: 10.2337/dc20-2372. Epub 2021 Mar 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We reevaluated the Action for Health in Diabetes (Look AHEAD) intervention, incorporating diabetes subgroups, to identify whether intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) is associated with differential risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) by diabetes subgroup.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In the Look AHEAD trial, 5,145 participants, aged 45-76 years, with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and overweight or obesity were randomly assigned to 10 years of ILI or a control condition of diabetes support and education. The ILI focused on weight loss through decreased caloric intake and increased physical activity. To characterize diabetes subgroups, we applied k-means clustering to data on age of diabetes diagnosis, BMI, waist circumference, and glycated hemoglobin. We examined whether relative intervention effects on the trial's prespecified CVD outcomes varied among diabetes subgroups.

RESULTS

We characterized four subgroups related to older age at diabetes onset (42% of sample), poor glucose control (14%), severe obesity (24%), and younger age at diabetes onset (20%). We observed interactions (all < 0.05) between intervention and diabetes subgroups for three separate composite cardiovascular outcomes. Randomization to ILI was associated with increased risk for each cardiovascular outcome only among the poor-glucose-control subgroup (hazard ratio >1.32). Among the three other diabetes subgroups, ILI was not associated with increased risk for CVD.

CONCLUSIONS

Among overweight and obese adults with T2D, a lifestyle intervention was associated with differential risk for CVD that was dependent on diabetes subgroup. Diabetes subgroups may be important to identify the patients who would achieve benefit and avoid harm from an ILI.

摘要

目的

我们重新评估了糖尿病行动研究(Look AHEAD)干预措施,纳入了糖尿病亚组,以确定强化生活方式干预(ILI)是否与糖尿病亚组的心血管疾病(CVD)风险相关。

研究设计和方法

在 Look AHEAD 试验中,5145 名年龄在 45-76 岁之间、患有 2 型糖尿病(T2D)和超重或肥胖的参与者被随机分配到 10 年的 ILI 或糖尿病支持和教育的对照组。ILI 侧重于通过减少热量摄入和增加身体活动来减肥。为了描述糖尿病亚组,我们应用 k-均值聚类对糖尿病诊断年龄、BMI、腰围和糖化血红蛋白的数据进行了聚类。我们研究了相对干预效果是否因糖尿病亚组的不同而有所不同。

结果

我们根据糖尿病诊断年龄、BMI、腰围和糖化血红蛋白的数据,将样本中的 42%分为老年组、14%分为血糖控制不良组、24%分为严重肥胖组和 20%分为年轻组。我们观察到干预与糖尿病亚组之间存在三个独立的心血管复合结局的交互作用(所有 P 值均<0.05)。仅在血糖控制不良的亚组中,ILI 与每个心血管结局的风险增加相关(危险比>1.32)。在其他三个糖尿病亚组中,ILI 与 CVD 风险增加无关。

结论

在超重和肥胖的 T2D 成年人中,生活方式干预与 CVD 的风险相关,这种相关性取决于糖尿病亚组。糖尿病亚组可能是识别那些可以从 ILI 中获益和避免伤害的患者的重要因素。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Introduction: .引言:.
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S1-S2. doi: 10.2337/dc20-Sint.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验