• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鼻音对谐波峰值突出度和声噪比的影响。

The Impact of Nasalance on Cepstral Peak Prominence and Harmonics-to-Noise Ratio.

作者信息

Madill Catherine, Nguyen Duong Duy, Yick-Ning Cham Kristie, Novakovic Daniel, McCabe Patricia

机构信息

Voice Research Laboratory, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Faculty of Health Sciences and the Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2019 Aug;129(8):E299-E304. doi: 10.1002/lary.27685. Epub 2018 Dec 25.

DOI:10.1002/lary.27685
PMID:30585334
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6767134/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Cepstral peak prominence (CPP) has been reported as a reliable measure of dysphonia and a preferred alternative to harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR). However, CPP has been observed to be sensitive to articulatory variation and vocal intensity. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of nasalance on CPP and HNR of voice signals. It was hypothesized that increased nasalance would be associated with decreased CPP.

STUDY DESIGN

Within-subject correlation design.

METHODS

Thirty vocally healthy female participants were recorded reading and producing a vowel in alternation with a nasal consonant while wearing a nasometer for calculation of nasalance. Recorded vowel, nasalized, and nasal segments of speech were used to calculate CPP using Analysis of Dysphonia in Speech and Voice software, and HNR and vocal intensity using Praat software.

RESULTS

Significant main effects of conditions were observed for CPP. CPP values decreased significantly when phonation changed from vowel to nasalized vowel and to nasal. There was correlation between CPP and nasalance and between CPP and intensity. HNR was slightly higher in the nasal condition than in vowel. There was a weak correlation between HNR and nasalance. No correlation was found between HNR and intensity.

CONCLUSIONS

CPP is sensitive to changes in vocal tract configuration caused by nasalization as well as intensity, whereas HNR is not. Therefore, CPP may reflect the periodicity in source signal or the filtering effects of vocal tract. Further research is needed to clarify the application and interpretation of CPP in clinical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 129:E299-E304, 2019.

摘要

目的/假设:谐波峰值突出度(CPP)已被报道为一种可靠的嗓音障碍测量指标,是谐波噪声比(HNR)的首选替代指标。然而,已观察到CPP对发音变化和嗓音强度敏感。本研究的目的是探讨鼻音对语音信号CPP和HNR的影响。研究假设为鼻音增加会与CPP降低相关。

研究设计

受试者内相关性设计。

方法

30名嗓音健康的女性参与者在佩戴鼻流量计以计算鼻音时,交替朗读并发出一个元音和一个鼻辅音。使用语音和嗓音障碍分析软件计算录制的元音、鼻化音和鼻音语音片段的CPP,使用Praat软件计算HNR和嗓音强度。

结果

观察到CPP存在显著的条件主效应。当发声从元音变为鼻化元音再变为鼻音时,CPP值显著降低。CPP与鼻音以及CPP与强度之间存在相关性。鼻音条件下的HNR略高于元音条件下的。HNR与鼻音之间存在弱相关性。未发现HNR与强度之间存在相关性。

结论

CPP对鼻化以及强度引起的声道构型变化敏感,而HNR则不然。因此,CPP可能反映源信号的周期性或声道的滤波效应。需要进一步研究以阐明CPP在临床实践中的应用和解释。

证据水平

4 喉镜,129:E299 - E304,2019年。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa30/6767134/8abdce3d21d9/LARY-129-E299-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa30/6767134/8abdce3d21d9/LARY-129-E299-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa30/6767134/8abdce3d21d9/LARY-129-E299-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Impact of Nasalance on Cepstral Peak Prominence and Harmonics-to-Noise Ratio.鼻音对谐波峰值突出度和声噪比的影响。
Laryngoscope. 2019 Aug;129(8):E299-E304. doi: 10.1002/lary.27685. Epub 2018 Dec 25.
2
Use of cepstral analysis for differentiating dysphonic from normal voices in children.运用倒谱分析鉴别儿童嗓音障碍与正常嗓音。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Jan;116:107-113. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.10.029. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
3
Acoustic analyses of thyroidectomy-related changes in vowel phonation.甲状腺切除术相关的元音发音声学分析。
J Voice. 2012 Nov;26(6):711-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.06.006.
4
Use of cepstral analyses for differentiating normal from dysphonic voices: a comparative study of connected speech versus sustained vowel in European Portuguese female speakers.运用谐波倒谱分析区分正常嗓音与发声障碍嗓音:欧洲葡萄牙语女性说话者连贯语音与持续元音的对比研究
J Voice. 2014 May;28(3):282-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.10.001. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
5
Acoustic Perturbation Measures Improve with Increasing Vocal Intensity in Individuals With and Without Voice Disorders.无论是否患有嗓音障碍,随着嗓音强度增加,声学微扰指标均有所改善。
J Voice. 2018 Mar;32(2):162-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 May 18.
6
Voice disorder discrimination using vowel acoustic measures in female speakers.基于元音声学特征的女性嗓音障碍判别。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Sep-Oct;59(5):2087-2102. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13081. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
7
Investigating the cepstral acoustic characteristics of voice in healthy children.研究健康儿童嗓音倒频谱声学特征。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Sep;148:110815. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110815. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
8
Validation of Cepstral Acoustic Analysis for Normal and Pathological Voice in the Japanese Language.基于倒谱分析的日语正常嗓音与病理嗓音的验证。
J Voice. 2022 Nov;36(6):770-776. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.08.026. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
9
Predicting Intelligibility Deficit in Dysphonic Speech with Cepstral Peak Prominence.用谐波峰值突出度预测嗓音障碍语音中的可懂度缺陷
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2018 Feb;127(2):69-78. doi: 10.1177/0003489417743518. Epub 2017 Dec 10.
10
Effects of Fundamental Frequency, Vocal Intensity, Sample Duration, and Vowel Context in Cepstral and Spectral Measures of Dysphonic Voices.基频、发声强度、样本时长及元音语境对嗓音障碍语音的倒谱和频谱测量的影响
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 May 22;63(5):1326-1339. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00049. Epub 2020 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Acoustic Analysis of Blues, Country, Folk, Italian Opera, and Rock Singing.蓝调、乡村、民谣、意大利歌剧和摇滚演唱的声学分析。
J Voice. 2025 Jun 24. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.05.018.
2
Effects of the Program for Developing Oral Communication Expressiveness on university radio announcers: a pre/post intervention study.口腔交流表达能力发展项目对大学广播播音员的影响:一项干预前后研究。
Codas. 2025 Feb 10;37(2):e20240122. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/e20240122pt. eCollection 2025.
3
[Current methods of acoustic analysis of voice: a review].[当前嗓音声学分析方法综述]

本文引用的文献

1
Voice outcome indicators for unilateral vocal fold paralysis surgery: a review of the literature.单侧声带麻痹手术的嗓音结果指标:文献回顾。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Feb;275(2):459-468. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4844-9. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
2
Intra-speaker and inter-speaker variability in speech sound pressure level across repeated readings.在多次重复朗读过程中,语音声压级的说话者内和说话者间变异性。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Apr;141(4):2353. doi: 10.1121/1.4979115.
3
Predicting Voice Disorder Status From Smoothed Measures of Cepstral Peak Prominence Using Praat and Analysis of Dysphonia in Speech and Voice (ADSV).
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Dec;36(12):966-970;976. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2022.12.016.
4
Co-Occurrence of Hypernasality and Voice Impairment in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Acoustic Quantification.肌萎缩侧索硬化症中鼻音亢进和语音障碍的共存:声学定量。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Dec 13;64(12):4772-4783. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00123. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
5
Does the wearing of masks change voice and speech parameters?戴口罩是否会改变声音和言语参数?
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Apr;279(4):1701-1708. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07086-9. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
6
Can the Vocal Expression of Intellectually Disabled Individuals Be Used as a Pain Indicator? Initial Findings Supporting a Possible Novice Assessment Method.智力残疾个体的声音表达能否用作疼痛指标?支持一种可能的初步评估方法的初步发现。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 22;12:655202. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655202. eCollection 2021.
7
Acoustic voice characteristics with and without wearing a facemask.佩戴和不佩戴口罩时的声学语音特征。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 11;11(1):5651. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85130-8.
使用Praat通过平滑的谐波峰值突出度测量以及言语和嗓音中的发声障碍分析(ADSV)预测嗓音障碍状态。
J Voice. 2017 Sep;31(5):557-566. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
4
An iOS-based Cepstral Peak Prominence Application: Feasibility for Patient Practice of Resonant Voice.一款基于iOS的谐波峰值突出度应用程序:用于患者进行共鸣嗓音训练的可行性。
J Voice. 2017 Jan;31(1):131.e9-131.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.11.022. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
5
The effect of speaking context on spectral- and cepstral-based acoustic features of normal voice.说话语境对正常嗓音基于频谱和倒谱的声学特征的影响。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2016;30(1):1-11. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2015.1087049. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
6
The Effect of CAPE-V Sentences on Cepstral/Spectral Acoustic Measures in Dysphonic Speakers.CAPE-V 语句对嗓音障碍患者的谐波倒谱/频谱声学指标的影响。
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2015;67(1):15-20. doi: 10.1159/000371656. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
7
The Nasality Severity Index 2.0: Revision of an Objective Multiparametric Approach to Hypernasality.鼻音严重程度指数2.0:一种客观多参数高鼻音评估方法的修订
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016 May;53(3):e60-70. doi: 10.1597/14-247. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
8
A randomized controlled trial of stretch-and-flow voice therapy for muscle tension dysphonia.一项针对肌肉紧张性发声障碍的拉伸与流畅性嗓音治疗的随机对照试验。
Laryngoscope. 2015 Jun;125(6):1420-5. doi: 10.1002/lary.25155. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
9
Voice outcomes after transoral laser microsurgery for early glottic cancer-considering signal type and smoothed cepstral peak prominence.早期声门癌经口激光显微手术后的嗓音结果——考虑信号类型和平滑谐波峰值突出度
J Voice. 2015 May;29(3):370-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.08.018. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
10
Quantifying the cepstral peak prominence, a measure of dysphonia.量化谐波峰值突出度,一种衡量发声障碍的指标。
J Voice. 2014 Nov;28(6):783-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.05.005. Epub 2014 Aug 29.