• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定避免未来 COVID-19 疫情波的必要社交距离水平:伦敦东北部的建模研究。

Determining the level of social distancing necessary to avoid future COVID-19 epidemic waves: a modelling study for North East London.

机构信息

Financial Strategy Team, NHS North East London Commissioning Alliance, London, UK.

School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 11;11(1):5806. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84907-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-84907-1
PMID:33707546
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7952900/
Abstract

Determining the level of social distancing, quantified here as the reduction in daily number of social contacts per person, i.e. the daily contact rate, needed to maintain control of the COVID-19 epidemic and not exceed acute bed capacity in case of future epidemic waves, is important for future planning of relaxing of strict social distancing measures. This work uses mathematical modelling to simulate the levels of COVID-19 in North East London (NEL) and inform the level of social distancing necessary to protect the public and the healthcare demand from future COVID-19 waves. We used a Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Removed (SEIR) model describing the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in NEL, calibrated to data on hospitalised patients with confirmed COVID-19, hospital discharges and in-hospital deaths in NEL during the first epidemic wave. To account for the uncertainty in both the infectiousness period and the proportion of symptomatic infection, we simulated nine scenarios for different combinations of infectiousness period (1, 3 and 5 days) and proportion of symptomatic infection (70%, 50% and 25% of all infections). Across all scenarios, the calibrated model was used to assess the risk of occurrence and predict the strength and timing of a second COVID-19 wave under varying levels of daily contact rate from July 04, 2020. Specifically, the daily contact rate required to suppress the epidemic and prevent a resurgence of COVID-19 cases, and the daily contact rate required to stay within the acute bed capacity of the NEL system without any additional intervention measures after July 2020, were determined across the nine different scenarios. Our results caution against a full relaxing of the lockdown later in 2020, predicting that a return to pre-COVID-19 levels of social contact from July 04, 2020, would induce a second wave up to eight times the original wave. With different levels of ongoing social distancing, future resurgence can be avoided, or the strength of the resurgence can be mitigated. Keeping the daily contact rate lower than 5 or 6, depending on scenarios, can prevent an increase in the number of COVID-19 cases, could keep the effective reproduction number R below 1 and a secondary COVID-19 wave may be avoided in NEL. A daily contact rate between 6 and 7, across scenarios, is likely to increase R above 1 and result in a secondary COVID-19 wave with significantly increased COVID-19 cases and associated deaths, but with demand for hospital-based care remaining within the bed capacity of the NEL health and care system. In contrast, an increase in daily contact rate above 8 to 9, depending on scenarios, will likely exceed the acute bed capacity in NEL and may potentially require additional lockdowns. This scenario is associated with significantly increased COVID-19 cases and deaths, and acute COVID-19 care demand is likely to require significant scaling down of the usual operation of the health and care system and should be avoided. Our findings suggest that to avoid future COVID-19 waves and to stay within the acute bed capacity of the NEL health and care system, maintaining social distancing in NEL is advised with a view to limiting the average number of social interactions in the population. Increasing the level of social interaction beyond the limits described in this work could result in future COVID-19 waves that will likely exceed the acute bed capacity in the system, and depending on the strength of the resurgence may require additional lockdown measures.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06c8/7952900/ffee52d42ef6/41598_2021_84907_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06c8/7952900/ae49a3d10602/41598_2021_84907_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06c8/7952900/49b28c1d319c/41598_2021_84907_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06c8/7952900/f655e442bebe/41598_2021_84907_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06c8/7952900/6d5932928524/41598_2021_84907_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06c8/7952900/ffee52d42ef6/41598_2021_84907_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06c8/7952900/ae49a3d10602/41598_2021_84907_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06c8/7952900/49b28c1d319c/41598_2021_84907_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06c8/7952900/f655e442bebe/41598_2021_84907_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06c8/7952900/6d5932928524/41598_2021_84907_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06c8/7952900/ffee52d42ef6/41598_2021_84907_Fig5_HTML.jpg
摘要

确定社交距离的水平,这里量化为每个人每天减少的社交接触次数,即每天的接触率,对于未来放松严格社交距离措施的规划很重要。这项工作使用数学模型模拟了伦敦东北部(NEL)的 COVID-19 水平,并为保护公众和未来 COVID-19 浪潮中的医疗需求提供了必要的社交距离水平。我们使用描述 SARS-CoV-2 在 NEL 中传播的易感-暴露-感染-清除(SEIR)模型,该模型根据 NEL 中确诊 COVID-19 的住院患者、出院和住院死亡的数据进行了校准。为了考虑传染性期和有症状感染比例的不确定性,我们模拟了不同传染性期(1、3 和 5 天)和有症状感染比例(所有感染的 70%、50%和 25%)组合的九个场景。在所有场景中,使用校准模型评估了在不同日常接触率下(从 2020 年 7 月 4 日开始)发生第二波 COVID-19 的风险,并预测其强度和时间。具体来说,确定了在九个不同场景下抑制疫情和防止 COVID-19 病例再次出现所需的日常接触率,以及在 2020 年 7 月之后无需任何额外干预措施即可维持 NEL 系统急性病床容量所需的日常接触率。我们的研究结果警告不要在 2020 年底全面放松封锁,预测从 2020 年 7 月 4 日开始恢复到 COVID-19 之前的社交接触水平,将引发比原始波高 8 倍的第二波。通过不同水平的持续社交距离,可以避免未来的复苏,或者可以减轻复苏的强度。保持每日接触率低于 5 或 6(取决于场景)可以防止 COVID-19 病例的增加,可以使有效繁殖数 R 保持在 1 以下,并且可以避免 NEL 中的二次 COVID-19 浪潮。每日接触率在 6 到 7 之间(取决于场景)可能会导致 R 上升到 1 以上,并导致 COVID-19 病例和相关死亡人数显著增加,但 NEL 基于医院的护理需求仍在该卫生和保健系统的病床容量之内。相比之下,如果每日接触率增加到 8 到 9(取决于场景)以上,则可能超过 NEL 的急性病床容量,并且可能需要额外的封锁。这种情况与 COVID-19 病例和死亡人数的大幅增加有关,并且急性 COVID-19 护理需求可能需要对卫生和保健系统的正常运作进行重大调整,应予以避免。我们的研究结果表明,为了避免未来的 COVID-19 浪潮并保持 NEL 卫生和保健系统的急性病床容量,建议在 NEL 中保持社交距离,以期限制人群中社交互动的平均次数。超出这项工作中描述的限制增加社交互动水平可能会导致未来的 COVID-19 浪潮,这些浪潮很可能超过系统的急性病床容量,并且根据复苏的强度,可能需要采取额外的封锁措施。

相似文献

1
Determining the level of social distancing necessary to avoid future COVID-19 epidemic waves: a modelling study for North East London.确定避免未来 COVID-19 疫情波的必要社交距离水平:伦敦东北部的建模研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 11;11(1):5806. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84907-1.
2
Determining the optimal strategy for reopening schools, the impact of test and trace interventions, and the risk of occurrence of a second COVID-19 epidemic wave in the UK: a modelling study.确定英国学校重新开放的最佳策略、检测和追踪干预措施的影响,以及发生第二波 COVID-19 疫情的风险:一项建模研究。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Nov;4(11):817-827. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30250-9. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
3
COVID-19 healthcare demand and mortality in Sweden in response to non-pharmaceutical mitigation and suppression scenarios.瑞典针对非药物缓解和抑制情景的 COVID-19 医疗需求和死亡率。
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Oct 1;49(5):1443-1453. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa121.
4
Transmission dynamics and control of two epidemic waves of SARS-CoV-2 in South Korea.韩国两波 SARS-CoV-2 疫情的传播动态和控制。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 May 26;21(1):485. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06204-6.
5
Predictions of COVID-19 dynamics in the UK: Short-term forecasting and analysis of potential exit strategies.预测英国的 COVID-19 动态:短期预测和潜在退出策略分析。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Jan 22;17(1):e1008619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008619. eCollection 2021 Jan.
6
A modelling analysis of the effectiveness of second wave COVID-19 response strategies in Australia.澳大利亚第二波 COVID-19 应对策略效果的建模分析。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 7;11(1):11958. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91418-6.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Projected COVID-19 epidemic in the United States in the context of the effectiveness of a potential vaccine and implications for social distancing and face mask use.考虑潜在疫苗效果的情况下美国的 COVID-19 疫情预测,以及对社会隔离和戴口罩的影响。
Vaccine. 2021 Apr 15;39(16):2295-2302. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.02.056. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
9
Association of tiered restrictions and a second lockdown with COVID-19 deaths and hospital admissions in England: a modelling study.分层限制和第二次封锁与英格兰 COVID-19 死亡和住院人数的关联:一项建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;21(4):482-492. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30984-1. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
10
Modelling the impact of reopening schools in the UK in early 2021 in the presence of the alpha variant and with roll-out of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2.模拟在2021年初英国重新开学、出现阿尔法变异毒株以及开展针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)疫苗接种的情况下所产生的影响。
J Math Anal Appl. 2022 Oct 15;514(2):126050. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2022.126050. Epub 2022 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences of hospice staff beyond the frontlines during COVID-19: A qualitative secondary analysis study.新冠疫情期间临终关怀机构一线以外工作人员的经历:一项定性二次分析研究
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2025 Apr 12;19:26323524251327804. doi: 10.1177/26323524251327804. eCollection 2025.
2
Effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions as implemented in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review.新冠疫情期间英国实施的非药物干预措施的有效性:一项快速综述。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2025 May 29;47(2):268-302. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaf017.
3
Non-pharmaceutical interventions to reduce COVID-19 transmission in the UK: a rapid mapping review and interactive evidence gap map.

本文引用的文献

1
Controlling COVID-19 via test-trace-quarantine.通过检测-追踪-隔离控制新冠病毒。
Nat Commun. 2021 May 20;12(1):2993. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23276-9.
2
Testing, tracing and isolation in compartmental models. compartmental 模型中的检测、追踪和隔离。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Mar 4;17(3):e1008633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008633. eCollection 2021 Mar.
3
SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV viral load dynamics, duration of viral shedding, and infectiousness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.SARS-CoV-2、SARS-CoV 和 MERS-CoV 的病毒载量动态、病毒脱落持续时间和传染性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
非药物干预措施以降低英国 COVID-19 传播:快速映射综述和交互式证据差距图。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2024 May 29;46(2):e279-e293. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdae025.
4
Reformulating the susceptible-infectious-removed model in terms of the number of detected cases: well-posedness of the observational model.根据已检测病例数重新表述易感-感染-移除模型:观测模型的适定性。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2022 Oct 3;380(2233):20210306. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2021.0306. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
5
Modeling waning and boosting of COVID-19 in Canada with vaccination.利用疫苗接种建模加拿大 COVID-19 的衰减和增强。
Epidemics. 2022 Jun;39:100583. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2022.100583. Epub 2022 May 25.
6
Evaluating efficacy of indoor non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19 outbreaks with a coupled spatial-SIR agent-based simulation framework.使用基于空间-SIR 耦合智能体的模拟框架评估室内非药物干预措施对 COVID-19 疫情的效果。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 13;12(1):6202. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09942-y.
7
Exit strategies from lockdowns due to COVID-19: a scoping review.因 COVID-19 而实施封锁后的退出策略:范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 12;22(1):488. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12845-2.
8
A machine learning analysis of the relationship of demographics and social gathering attendance from 41 countries during pandemic.对 41 个国家在大流行期间人口统计学和社交聚会出席情况之间关系的机器学习分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 14;12(1):724. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04305-5.
9
Testing, tracing and isolation in compartmental models. compartmental 模型中的检测、追踪和隔离。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Mar 4;17(3):e1008633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008633. eCollection 2021 Mar.
Lancet Microbe. 2021 Jan;2(1):e13-e22. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30172-5. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
4
Predictions of COVID-19 dynamics in the UK: Short-term forecasting and analysis of potential exit strategies.预测英国的 COVID-19 动态:短期预测和潜在退出策略分析。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Jan 22;17(1):e1008619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008619. eCollection 2021 Jan.
5
Prevalence of suspected COVID-19 infection in patients from ethnic minority populations: a cross-sectional study in primary care.少数民族人群疑似 COVID-19 感染患者的患病率:初级保健中的横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Oct 1;70(699):e696-e704. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X712601. Print 2020 Oct.
6
Determining the optimal strategy for reopening schools, the impact of test and trace interventions, and the risk of occurrence of a second COVID-19 epidemic wave in the UK: a modelling study.确定英国学校重新开放的最佳策略、检测和追踪干预措施的影响,以及发生第二波 COVID-19 疫情的风险:一项建模研究。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Nov;4(11):817-827. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30250-9. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
7
It Is Time to Address Airborne Transmission of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).是时候应对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的空气传播问题了。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 3;71(9):2311-2313. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa939.
8
Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.物理隔离、口罩和眼部防护预防 SARS-CoV-2 和 COVID-19 的人际传播:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2020 Jun 27;395(10242):1973-1987. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
9
Features of 20 133 UK patients in hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: prospective observational cohort study.使用 ISARIC WHO 临床特征协议住院的 20133 例英国新冠患者的特征:前瞻性观察队列研究。
BMJ. 2020 May 22;369:m1985. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1985.
10
A systematic review of asymptomatic infections with COVID-19.对 COVID-19 无症状感染的系统评价。
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2021 Feb;54(1):12-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2020.05.001. Epub 2020 May 15.