Suppr超能文献

美国研究机构使用的信赖协议模板研究

A Study of Reliance Agreement Templates Used by U.S. Research Institutions.

作者信息

Resnik David B, Taylor Juliet, Morris Kathryn, Shi Min

机构信息

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.

Duke University, Bioethics and Science Policy Program.

出版信息

IRB. 2018 May-Jun;40(3):6-10. doi: 10.1002/eahr.403002. Epub 2018 May 1.

Abstract

We performed a content analysis of reliance agreement templates from 73 of the top U.S. research institutions ranked by research funding. 67.1% of institutions in our sample use the Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP) template and 8.2% use the SMART IRB template. Although a significant percentage of institutions (45.2%) use their own custom template, many of these also use the OHRP template or the SMART IRB template. 21.9% of institutional templates have only the OHRP minimum 10 contractual provisions (or elements), 27.4% have 11 elements, 26% have 12-19 elements, and 24.7% have 20 or more elements. 5.5% of institutional templates require the relied-upon institution to indemnify the relying institution, 6.8% require the relying institution to indemnify the relied-upon institution, 8.2% require the relied-upon institution to have liability insurance, 15.1% require the relying institution to have liability insurance, 2.7% require the relied-upon institution to have accreditation, and none require the relying institution to have accreditation. The number of elements in the template was positively associated with total research funding and private institutional control. Our data indicate that institutions which are seeking reliance agreements for cooperative research involving human subjects are not likely to encounter many difficulties because most are using commonly employed templates and are not imposing potentially disputable requirements on parties to the agreement.

摘要

我们对按研究经费排名的美国73家顶尖研究机构的依赖协议模板进行了内容分析。在我们的样本中,67.1%的机构使用人类研究保护办公室(OHRP)模板,8.2%的机构使用SMART IRB模板。尽管相当比例的机构(45.2%)使用自己定制的模板,但其中许多机构也使用OHRP模板或SMART IRB模板。21.9%的机构模板只有OHRP规定的最少10项合同条款(或要素),27.4%有11项要素,26%有12至19项要素,24.7%有20项或更多要素。5.5%的机构模板要求被依赖机构赔偿依赖机构,6.8%要求依赖机构赔偿被依赖机构,8.2%要求被依赖机构购买责任保险,15.1%要求依赖机构购买责任保险,2.7%要求被依赖机构获得认证,而没有要求依赖机构获得认证的。模板中的要素数量与总研究经费和私立机构控制呈正相关。我们的数据表明,寻求涉及人类受试者的合作研究依赖协议的机构不太可能遇到很多困难,因为大多数机构使用的是常用模板,并且没有对协议各方提出可能有争议的要求。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

6
The paradoxical problem with multiple-IRB review.多机构审查委员会审查中自相矛盾的问题。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 21;363(17):1591-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1005101. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
10
Liability for institutional review boards: from regulation to litigation.
J Leg Med. 2004 Jun;25(2):131-84. doi: 10.1080/01947640490457451.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验