Faculty of Education, Arts and Sports, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Norway.
J Sports Sci Med. 2021 Mar 1;20(1):56-61. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2021.56. eCollection 2021 Mar.
Resistance-training exercises can be classified as either single- or multi-joint exercises and differences in surface electromyography (EMG) amplitude between the two training methods may identify which muscles can benefit from either training modality. This study aimed to compare the surface EMG amplitude of five hip- and knee extensors during one multi-joint (leg press) and two single-joint exercises (knee extension and kickback). Fifteen resistance-trained men completed one familiarization session to determine their unilateral six repetitions maximum (6RM) in the three exercises. During the following experimental session, EMG amplitudes of the vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, rectus femoris, gluteus maximus and biceps femoris of the left leg were measured while performing three repetitions on their respective 6RM loads. The multi-joint exercise leg press produced higher EMG amplitude of the vastus lateralis (ES = 0.92, p = 0.003) than the single-joint exercise knee extension, whereas the rectus femoris demonstrated higher EMG amplitude during the knee extension (ES = 0.93, p = 0.005). The biceps femoris EMG amplitude was higher during the single-joint exercise kickback compared to the leg press (ES = 2.27, p < 0.001), while no significant differences in gluteus maximus (ES = 0.08, p = 0.898) or vastus medialis (ES = 0.056, p = 0.025 were observed between exercises. The difference in EMG amplitude between single- and multi-joint exercises appears to vary depending on the specific exercises and the muscle groups tested. Leg press is a viable and time-efficient option for targeting several hip- and knee extensors during resistance training of the lower limbs, but the single-joint exercises may be preferable for targeting the rectus femoris and biceps femoris.
抗阻训练可分为单关节或多关节运动,两种训练方法的表面肌电图(EMG)幅度差异可能会确定哪些肌肉可以从任一种训练方式中受益。本研究旨在比较一种多关节(腿举)和两种单关节运动(伸膝和踢腿)时,五髋和膝伸肌的表面 EMG 幅度。15 名抗阻训练男性完成了一次熟悉过程,以确定他们在三种运动中的单侧 6 次重复最大(6RM)。在随后的实验过程中,左腿的股外侧肌、股内侧肌、股直肌、臀大肌和股二头肌的 EMG 幅度在各自 6RM 负荷下进行三次重复时进行了测量。多关节运动腿举产生的股外侧肌 EMG 幅度(ES=0.92,p=0.003)高于单关节运动伸膝,而股直肌在伸膝时表现出更高的 EMG 幅度(ES=0.93,p=0.005)。与腿举相比,股二头肌在单关节运动踢腿时的 EMG 幅度更高(ES=2.27,p<0.001),而臀大肌(ES=0.08,p=0.898)或股内侧肌(ES=0.056,p=0.025)在运动之间没有观察到显著差异。单关节和多关节运动之间的 EMG 幅度差异似乎取决于特定的运动和测试的肌肉群。腿举是下肢抗阻训练中针对多个髋和膝伸肌的一种可行且高效的选择,但单关节运动可能更适合针对股直肌和股二头肌。