Vigotsky Andrew D, Halperin Israel, Lehman Gregory J, Trajano Gabriel S, Vieira Taian M
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States.
Physiology Discipline, Australian Institute of Sport, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Front Physiol. 2018 Jan 4;8:985. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00985. eCollection 2017.
Surface electromyography (sEMG) is a popular research tool in sport and rehabilitation sciences. Common study designs include the comparison of sEMG amplitudes collected from different muscles as participants perform various exercises and techniques under different loads. Based on such comparisons, researchers attempt to draw conclusions concerning the neuro- and electrophysiological underpinning of force production and hypothesize about possible longitudinal adaptations, such as strength and hypertrophy. However, such conclusions are frequently unsubstantiated and unwarranted. Hence, the goal of this review is to discuss what can and cannot be inferred from comparative research designs as it pertains to both the acute and longitudinal outcomes. General methodological recommendations are made, gaps in the literature are identified, and lines for future research to help improve the applicability of sEMG are suggested.
表面肌电图(sEMG)是运动和康复科学领域一种常用的研究工具。常见的研究设计包括,在参与者于不同负荷下进行各种练习和技术动作时,比较从不同肌肉采集到的sEMG振幅。基于此类比较,研究人员试图得出有关力量产生的神经和电生理基础的结论,并推测可能的纵向适应性变化,如力量和肌肉肥大。然而,此类结论往往缺乏依据且不合理。因此,本综述的目的是讨论从比较研究设计中可以和不可以推断出哪些与急性和纵向结果相关的内容。文中给出了一般性的方法学建议,找出了文献中的空白,并提出了有助于提高sEMG适用性的未来研究方向。