Singh Varun, Malik Manoj, Kaur Jaspreet, Kulandaivelan Sivachidambaram, Punia Sonu
Department of Physiotherapy, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar, India.
Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2021 Mar-Apr;15(2):49-57.
The objective of this meta-analysis and systematic review is to analyze the efficacy of physiotherapy interventions in management of lumbar prolapsed intervertebral disc (PIVD).
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched in PubMed and Cochrane Library using related keywords and advanced option, from commencement to January 2019. Quality of researches was assessed by PEDro scoring. Risk of bias and homogeneity were assessed using Cochrane risk of bias tool and Ivalue, respectively. Meta-analysis of included study was done using "Review manager (Software, version 5.3)."
Eleven RCTs were included in this systematic review. Six RCTs were excluded from meta-analysis due to insufficient data availability. Meta-analysis reveals significant decrease in pain ( = 0.001, mean difference (MD) -0.91; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.35 to -1.48) and disability ( < 0.0001; MD -5.76; 95%CI; -3.18 to -8.34) with moderate heterogeneity (I2=40%; = 0.17, I2=54%; = 0.09, respectively). There was non-significant improvement in straight leg raise (SLR), = 0.07; MD 7.96; 95%CI; -0.59-16.51 with moderate heterogeneity (I2=56%; = 0.11).
Physiotherapy interventions are effective in management of lumbar PIVD. Physiological and biomechanical factors such as correction of the displaced disc, opening of the foramina, increase in intervertebral space, and reduction in herniation size with negative intradiscal pressure may be possible mechanisms.
本荟萃分析和系统评价旨在分析物理治疗干预措施在腰椎间盘突出症(PIVD)管理中的疗效。
从开始到2019年1月,使用相关关键词和高级选项在PubMed和Cochrane图书馆中检索随机对照试验(RCT)。研究质量通过PEDro评分进行评估。分别使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具和I值评估偏倚风险和同质性。使用“Review manager(软件,版本5.3)”对纳入研究进行荟萃分析。
本系统评价纳入了11项RCT。由于数据可用性不足,6项RCT被排除在荟萃分析之外。荟萃分析显示疼痛(P = 0.001,平均差(MD)-0.91;95%置信区间(CI)-0.35至-1.48)和残疾(P < 0.0001;MD -5.76;95%CI;-3.18至-8.34)显著降低,异质性中等(I² = 40%;P = 0.17,I² = 54%;P = 0.09)。直腿抬高(SLR)无显著改善,P = 0.07;MD 7.96;95%CI;-0.59 - 16.51,异质性中等(I² = 56%;P = 0.11)。
物理治疗干预措施在腰椎PIVD的管理中是有效的。诸如纠正移位椎间盘、扩大椎间孔、增加椎间隙以及通过负椎间盘内压减少突出大小等生理和生物力学因素可能是其作用机制。