Suppr超能文献

[计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像对腰椎间盘突出症患者诊断效能的定量评估]

[Quantitative evaluation for diagnostic efficacy of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with lumbar disc herniation].

作者信息

Yu Xue-Wen, Niu Gang, Yang Jian, Ni Lei, Zhang Wei-Shan, Guo You-Min

机构信息

PET-CT Department, First Hospital of Medical College of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2011 Jan 4;91(1):23-7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic performances of CT and MRI in patients with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation through the Meta analytical method.

METHOD

The relevant English and Chinese articles published between 1980 and 2010 were searched in PubMed, Medline, Ovid database, Cochrane library and Chinese Periodical Web. According to the criteria for diagnostic researches published by Cochrane Method Group on Screening and Diagnostic Tests, each article was critically appraised and screened with regards to the absolute numbers of true-positive, false-negative, true-negative and false-positive. Statistical analysis was performed by the Meta-Disc version 1.4, SPSS 13.0 and Comprehensive Meta-analysis version II. Heterogeneity was tested and publication bias analyzed. And the pooled weighted sensitivity and specificity and the corresponding 95%CI were calculated. The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was performed and the area under the curve (AUC) calculated to summarize and evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of CT and MRI in lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Finally a sensitivity analysis was performed.

RESULTS

According to the criteria of internalization, 9 articles were included. Among them, the themes were CT (n = 3), MRI (n = 3) and CT & MRI (n = 3). Eight was prospectively studied and one retrospectively. At the diagnosis of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation, the pooled weighted sensibility and specificity and 95% confidence interval and area under SROC curve for CT to the lumbar intervertebral disc herniation was 0.73 (0.68 - 0.77), 0.78 (0.72 - 0.82) and 83.5% respectively. The MRI was 0.88 (0.83 - 0.91), 0.79 (0.71 - 0.87) and 88.8% respectively. There was statistically significant difference in the pooled weighted sensibility (P < 0.05); No statistically significant difference was found in the pooled weighted specificity (P > 0.05); And there was statistically significant difference in the AUC curve (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

After a meta-analysis of the diagnostic value of CT and MRI for the lumbar intervertebral disc herniation, MRI is more accurate than CT in the diagnosis of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.

摘要

目的

采用Meta分析方法评价CT和MRI对腰椎间盘突出症患者的诊断效能。

方法

检索1980年至2010年间发表在PubMed、Medline、Ovid数据库、Cochrane图书馆和中国期刊网上的相关中英文文章。根据Cochrane方法组关于筛查和诊断试验的诊断研究标准,对每篇文章进行严格评价,并根据真阳性、假阴性、真阴性和假阳性的绝对数量进行筛选。采用Meta-Disc 1.4版、SPSS 13.0版和综合Meta分析II版进行统计分析。检验异质性并分析发表偏倚。计算合并加权敏感度和特异度以及相应的95%可信区间。绘制汇总受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线并计算曲线下面积(AUC),以总结和评价CT和MRI对腰椎间盘突出症的诊断效率。最后进行敏感性分析。

结果

按照纳入标准,共纳入9篇文章。其中,主题为CT(n = 3)、MRI(n = 3)和CT与MRI(n = 3)。8篇为前瞻性研究,1篇为回顾性研究。在腰椎间盘突出症的诊断中,CT对腰椎间盘突出症的合并加权敏感度、特异度、95%可信区间和SROC曲线下面积分别为0.73(0.68 - 0.77)、0.78(0.72 - 0.82)和83.5%。MRI分别为0.88(0.83 - 0.91)、0.79(0.71 - 0.87)和88.8%。合并加权敏感度差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);合并加权特异度差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);AUC曲线差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。

结论

对CT和MRI诊断腰椎间盘突出症的价值进行Meta分析后,MRI在腰椎间盘突出症的诊断中比CT更准确。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验