Flores Gerónimo Joaquín, Corvera Poiré Eugenia, Chowienczyk Philip, Alastruey Jordi
Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Departamento de Física y Química Teórica, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City, Mexico.
Front Physiol. 2021 Feb 23;12:608098. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.608098. eCollection 2021.
Several studies suggest that central (aortic) blood pressure (cBP) is a better marker of cardiovascular disease risk than peripheral blood pressure (pBP). The morphology of the pBP wave, usually assessed non-invasively in the arm, differs significantly from the cBP wave, whose direct measurement is highly invasive. In particular, pulse pressure, PP (the amplitude of the pressure wave), increases from central to peripheral arteries, leading to the so-called pulse pressure amplification (ΔPP). The main purpose of this study was to develop a methodology for estimating central PP (cPP) from non-invasive measurements of aortic flow and peripheral PP. Our novel approach is based on a comprehensive understanding of the main cardiovascular properties that determine ΔPP along the aortic-brachial arterial path, namely brachial flow wave morphology in late systole, and vessel radius and distance along this arterial path. This understanding was achieved by using a blood flow model which allows for workable analytical solutions in the frequency domain that can be decoupled and simplified for each arterial segment. Results show the ability of our methodology to (i) capture changes in cPP and ΔPP produced by variations in cardiovascular properties and (ii) estimate cPP with mean differences smaller than 3.3 ± 2.8 mmHg on data for different age groups (25-75 years old) and 5.1 ± 6.9 mmHg on data for normotensive and hypertensive subjects. Our approach could improve cardiovascular function assessment in clinical cohorts for which aortic flow wave data is available.
多项研究表明,中心(主动脉)血压(cBP)比外周血压(pBP)更能准确反映心血管疾病风险。通常在手臂上进行无创测量的pBP波形态与cBP波有显著差异,而cBP波的直接测量具有高度侵入性。特别是,脉压(PP,即压力波的幅度)从中心动脉到外周动脉会增大,导致所谓的脉压放大(ΔPP)。本研究的主要目的是开发一种从主动脉血流的无创测量和外周PP来估计中心PP(cPP)的方法。我们的新方法基于对沿主动脉 - 肱动脉路径决定ΔPP的主要心血管特性的全面理解,即收缩期末期的肱动脉血流波形态,以及沿该动脉路径的血管半径和距离。这种理解是通过使用一个血流模型实现的,该模型在频域中提供了可行的解析解,这些解可以针对每个动脉段进行解耦和简化。结果表明我们的方法能够:(i)捕捉心血管特性变化所产生的cPP和ΔPP变化;(ii)在不同年龄组(25 - 75岁)的数据上估计cPP,平均差异小于3.3±2.8 mmHg,在血压正常和高血压受试者的数据上平均差异为5.1±6.9 mmHg。对于可获得主动脉血流波数据的临床队列,我们的方法可以改善心血管功能评估。