• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从主动脉血流估算中心血压:算法的开发和评估。

Estimating central blood pressure from aortic flow: development and assessment of algorithms.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, United Kingdom.

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London , United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2021 Feb 1;320(2):H494-H510. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00241.2020. Epub 2020 Oct 16.

DOI:10.1152/ajpheart.00241.2020
PMID:33064563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7612539/
Abstract

Central blood pressure (cBP) is a highly prognostic cardiovascular (CV) risk factor whose accurate, invasive assessment is costly and carries risks to patients. We developed and assessed novel algorithms for estimating cBP from noninvasive aortic hemodynamic data and a peripheral blood pressure measurement. These algorithms were created using three blood flow models: the two- and three-element Windkessel (0-D) models and a one-dimensional (1-D) model of the thoracic aorta. We tested new and existing methods for estimating CV parameters (left ventricular ejection time, outflow BP, arterial resistance and compliance, pulse wave velocity, and characteristic impedance) required for the cBP algorithms, using virtual (simulated) subjects ( = 19,646) for which reference CV parameters were known exactly. We then tested the cBP algorithms using virtual subjects ( = 4,064), for which reference cBP were available free of measurement error, and clinical datasets containing invasive ( = 10) and noninvasive ( = 171) reference cBP waves across a wide range of CV conditions. The 1-D algorithm outperformed the 0-D algorithms when the aortic vascular geometry was available, achieving central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) errors ≤ 2.1 ± 9.7 mmHg and root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) ≤ 6.4 ± 2.8 mmHg against invasive reference cBP waves ( = 10). When the aortic geometry was unavailable, the three-element 0-D algorithm achieved cSBP errors ≤ 6.0 ± 4.7 mmHg and RMSEs ≤ 5.9 ± 2.4 mmHg against noninvasive reference cBP waves ( = 171), outperforming the two-element 0-D algorithm. All CV parameters were estimated with mean percentage errors ≤ 8.2%, except for the aortic characteristic impedance (≤13.4%), which affected the three-element 0-D algorithm's performance. The freely available algorithms developed in this work enable fast and accurate calculation of the cBP wave and CV parameters in datasets containing noninvasive ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging data. First, our proposed methods for CV parameter estimation and a comprehensive set of methods from the literature were tested using in silico and clinical datasets. Second, optimized algorithms for estimating cBP from aortic flow were developed and tested for a wide range of cBP morphologies, including catheter cBP data. Third, a dataset of simulated cBP waves was created using a three-element Windkessel model. Fourth, the Windkessel model dataset and optimized algorithms are freely available.

摘要

中心血压(cBP)是一种高度预测心血管(CV)风险的因素,其准确、侵入性评估既昂贵又会给患者带来风险。我们开发并评估了从无创主动脉血流动力学数据和外周血压测量中估算 cBP 的新算法。这些算法是使用三种血流模型开发的:二元件和三元件风箱(0-D)模型以及胸主动脉的一维(1-D)模型。我们使用虚拟(模拟)受试者(n=19646)测试了用于 cBP 算法的估计 CV 参数(左心室射血时间、流出血压、动脉阻力和顺应性、脉搏波速度和特征阻抗)的新方法和现有方法,这些受试者的参考 CV 参数是准确的。然后,我们使用虚拟受试者(n=4064)测试了 cBP 算法,这些受试者的参考 cBP 是在没有测量误差的情况下获得的,并且还使用了包含广泛 CV 条件下的侵入性(n=10)和非侵入性(n=171)参考 cBP 波的临床数据集。当主动脉血管几何形状可用时,1-D 算法优于 0-D 算法,中心收缩压(cSBP)误差≤2.1±9.7mmHg,均方根误差(RMSE)≤6.4±2.8mmHg,与侵入性参考 cBP 波(n=10)相比。当主动脉几何形状不可用时,三元件 0-D 算法实现 cSBP 误差≤6.0±4.7mmHg,RMSE 误差≤5.9±2.4mmHg,与非侵入性参考 cBP 波(n=171)相比,优于二元件 0-D 算法。除了主动脉特征阻抗(≤13.4%),所有 CV 参数的估计平均百分比误差均≤8.2%,这影响了三元件 0-D 算法的性能。在包含非侵入性超声或磁共振成像数据的数据集,本文开发的自由可用算法能够快速准确地计算 cBP 波和 CV 参数。首先,我们使用体内数据集和临床数据集测试了 CV 参数估计的建议方法和文献中的一套综合方法。其次,为了广泛的 cBP 形态,包括导管 cBP 数据,我们开发并测试了从主动脉流量估算 cBP 的优化算法。第三,我们使用三元件风箱模型创建了一个模拟 cBP 波的数据集。第四,风箱模型数据集和优化算法是免费提供的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07c1/7612539/7d779ee06390/EMS143859-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07c1/7612539/5901e1dfc6f3/EMS143859-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07c1/7612539/5032f8a16817/EMS143859-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07c1/7612539/a0058af3732f/EMS143859-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07c1/7612539/7d779ee06390/EMS143859-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07c1/7612539/5901e1dfc6f3/EMS143859-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07c1/7612539/5032f8a16817/EMS143859-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07c1/7612539/a0058af3732f/EMS143859-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07c1/7612539/7d779ee06390/EMS143859-f004.jpg

相似文献

1
Estimating central blood pressure from aortic flow: development and assessment of algorithms.从主动脉血流估算中心血压:算法的开发和评估。
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2021 Feb 1;320(2):H494-H510. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00241.2020. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
2
In silico data-based comparison of the accuracy and error source of various methods for noninvasively estimating central aortic blood pressure.基于计算机的无创性估测中心动脉血压的各种方法的准确性和误差源的比较。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2024 Dec;257:108450. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108450. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
3
Single measurement estimation of central blood pressure using an arterial transfer function.使用动脉传递函数对中心血压进行单次测量估计
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2023 Feb;229:107254. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107254. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
4
Noninvasive method for determination of arterial compliance using Doppler echocardiography and subclavian pulse tracings. Validation and clinical application of a physiological model of the circulation.使用多普勒超声心动图和锁骨下脉搏描记法测定动脉顺应性的非侵入性方法。循环生理模型的验证及临床应用。
Circulation. 1994 Jun;89(6):2688-99. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.6.2688.
5
Invasive validation of the Antares algorithm for determining central blood pressure based on upper arm oscillometric pulse waves in patients with type 2 diabetes.基于上臂示波脉搏波的 Antares 算法测定 2 型糖尿病患者中心动脉血压的侵袭性验证。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2023 Jan;11(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2022-003119.
6
Noninvasive calculation of the aortic blood pressure waveform from the flow velocity waveform: a proof of concept.基于流速波形无创计算主动脉血压波形:概念验证
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2015 Sep;309(5):H969-76. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00152.2015. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
7
Modeling arterial pulse waves in healthy aging: a database for in silico evaluation of hemodynamics and pulse wave indexes.健康老龄化中的动脉脉搏波建模:用于血流动力学和脉搏波指数的计算评估的数据库。
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2019 Nov 1;317(5):H1062-H1085. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00218.2019. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
8
Improved pressure contour analysis for estimating cardiac stroke volume using pulse wave velocity measurement.利用脉搏波速度测量改进压力轮廓分析以估计心搏量
Biomed Eng Online. 2017 Apr 24;16(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12938-017-0341-z.
9
Ultrasound-based method for individualized estimation of central aortic blood pressure from flow velocity and diameter.基于超声的通过流速和直径对中心主动脉血压进行个体化估计的方法。
Comput Biol Med. 2022 Apr;143:105254. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105254. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
10
Noninvasive Cardiac Output and Central Systolic Pressure From Cuff-Pressure and Pulse Wave Velocity.从袖带压力和脉搏波速度测量无创心输出量和中心收缩压。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020 Jul;24(7):1968-1981. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2019.2956604. Epub 2019 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing cardiac assessments: accurate and efficient prediction of quantitative fractional flow reserve.增强心脏评估:定量血流储备分数的准确高效预测
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Jan 27;13:1438253. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1438253. eCollection 2025.
2
Uncertainty quantification of the pressure waveform using a Windkessel model.使用风箱模型对压力波形进行不确定性量化。
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2024 Dec;40(12):e3867. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3867. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
3
Design and implementation of a cost-effective, open-source, and programmable pulsatile flow system.

本文引用的文献

1
Modeling arterial pulse waves in healthy aging: a database for in silico evaluation of hemodynamics and pulse wave indexes.健康老龄化中的动脉脉搏波建模:用于血流动力学和脉搏波指数的计算评估的数据库。
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2019 Nov 1;317(5):H1062-H1085. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00218.2019. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
2
Optimization of topological complexity for one-dimensional arterial blood flow models.优化一维动脉血流模型的拓扑复杂度。
J R Soc Interface. 2018 Dec 21;15(149):20180546. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0546.
3
Patient-specific non-invasive estimation of pressure gradient across aortic coarctation using magnetic resonance imaging.
一种经济高效、开源且可编程的脉动流系统的设计与实现。
HardwareX. 2024 Jul 21;19:e00561. doi: 10.1016/j.ohx.2024.e00561. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Development of a Personalized Multiclass Classification Model to Detect Blood Pressure Variations Associated with Physical or Cognitive Workload.开发一种个性化的多类分类模型,以检测与体力或认知工作量相关的血压变化。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jun 6;24(11):3697. doi: 10.3390/s24113697.
5
Cardiac contractility is a key factor in determining pulse pressure and its peripheral amplification.心脏收缩力是决定脉压及其外周放大的关键因素。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jun 23;10:1197842. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1197842. eCollection 2023.
6
A Vector Fitting Approach for the Automated Estimation of Lumped Boundary Conditions of 1D Circulation Models.一种用于自动估计一维循环模型集中边界条件的向量拟合方法。
Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2023 Aug;14(4):505-525. doi: 10.1007/s13239-023-00669-z. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
7
Arterial pulse wave modeling and analysis for vascular-age studies: a review from VascAgeNet.动脉脉搏波建模与分析在血管年龄研究中的应用:来自 VascAgeNet 的综述。
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2023 Jul 1;325(1):H1-H29. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00705.2022. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
8
Hemodynamic profiles of arterial hypertension with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.动态血压监测的动脉高血压血流动力学特征。
Hypertens Res. 2023 Jun;46(6):1482-1492. doi: 10.1038/s41440-023-01196-z. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
9
Human Hypertension Blood Flow Model Using Fractional Calculus.基于分数阶微积分的人体高血压血流模型
Front Physiol. 2022 Mar 22;13:838593. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.838593. eCollection 2022.
10
Arterial pulse wave propagation across stenoses and aneurysms: assessment of one-dimensional simulations against three-dimensional simulations and measurements.动脉脉搏波在狭窄和动脉瘤处的传播:一维模拟与三维模拟及测量结果的评估
J R Soc Interface. 2021 Apr;18(177):20200881. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0881. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
利用磁共振成像对主动脉缩窄处压力梯度进行个体化无创评估。
J Cardiol. 2019 Jun;73(6):544-552. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.12.016. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
4
Multiscale mathematical modeling vs. the generalized transfer function approach for aortic pressure estimation: a comparison with invasive data.多尺度数学建模与广义传递函数方法在主动脉压估计中的比较:与有创数据的比较。
Hypertens Res. 2019 May;42(5):690-698. doi: 10.1038/s41440-018-0159-5. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
5
Assessing mental stress from the photoplethysmogram: a numerical study.从光电容积脉搏波评估精神压力:一项数值研究。
Physiol Meas. 2018 May 15;39(5):054001. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/aabe6a.
6
Non-invasive assessment of patient-specific aortic haemodynamics from four-dimensional flow MRI data.基于四维血流磁共振成像数据的患者特异性主动脉血流动力学无创评估。
Interface Focus. 2018 Feb 6;8(1):20170006. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2017.0006. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
7
Characteristic impedance: frequency or time domain approach?特性阻抗:频域还是时域方法?
Physiol Meas. 2018 Jan 31;39(1):014004. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/aa9d60.
8
Identifying Hemodynamic Determinants of Pulse Pressure: A Combined Numerical and Physiological Approach.识别脉压的血流动力学决定因素:一种数值与生理学相结合的方法。
Hypertension. 2017 Dec;70(6):1176-1182. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09706. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
9
Numerical assessment and comparison of pulse wave velocity methods aiming at measuring aortic stiffness.旨在测量主动脉僵硬度的脉搏波速度方法的数值评估与比较。
Physiol Meas. 2017 Oct 31;38(11):1953-1967. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/aa905a.
10
Improved pressure contour analysis for estimating cardiac stroke volume using pulse wave velocity measurement.利用脉搏波速度测量改进压力轮廓分析以估计心搏量
Biomed Eng Online. 2017 Apr 24;16(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12938-017-0341-z.