Lee Dong Ho, Kim Jing Woong, Lee Jeong Min, Kim Jong Man, Lee Min Woo, Rhim Hyunchul, Hur Young Hoe, Suh Kyung-Suk
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Radiology, Chosun University Hospital and Chosun University College of Medicine, Chosun, Republic of Korea.
Liver Cancer. 2021 Feb;10(1):25-37. doi: 10.1159/000510909. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
Treatment outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (p-RFA) for small single hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) have not yet been fully compared. The aim of this study was to compare LLR and p-RFA as first-line treatment options in patients with single nodular HCCs ≤3 cm.
From January 2014 to December 2016, a total of 566 patients with single nodular HCC ≤3 cm treated by either LLR ( = 251) or p-RFA ( = 315) were included. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cumulative incidence of local tumor progression (LTP) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared using the log-rank test. Treatment outcome of 2 treatment modalities was compared in the subgroup of patients according to the tumor location.
There were no significant differences in overall survival between LLR and p-RFA ( = 0.160); however, 3-year RFS was demonstrated to be significantly higher after LLR (74.4%) than after p-RFA (66.0%) ( = 0.013), owing to its significantly lower cumulative incidence of LTP (2.1% at 3 years after LLR vs. 10.0% after p-RFA, < 0.001). The complication rate of p-RFA was significantly lower than that of LLR (5.1 vs. 10.0%, = 0.026). LLR also provided significantly better local tumor control than p-RFA for subscapular tumors (3-year LTP rates: 1.9 vs. 8.8%, = 0.012), perivascular tumors (3-year LTP rates: 0.0 vs. 17.2%, = 0.007), and tumors located in anteroinfero-lateral liver portions (3-year LTP rates: 0.0 vs. 10.7%, < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in LTP rates between LLR and p-RFA for non-subcapsular and non-perivascular tumors ( = 0.482) and for tumors in postero-superior liver portions ( = 0.380).
LLR can provide significantly better local tumor control than p-RFA for small single HCCs in subcapsular, perivascular, and anteroinferolateral liver portions and thus may be the preferred treatment option for these tumors.
腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)和经皮射频消融术(p-RFA)治疗小的单发肝细胞癌(HCC)的治疗效果尚未得到充分比较。本研究的目的是比较LLR和p-RFA作为≤3 cm的单发结节性HCC患者的一线治疗选择。
纳入2014年1月至2016年12月期间共566例接受LLR(n = 251)或p-RFA(n = 315)治疗的单发结节性HCC≤3 cm的患者。采用Kaplan-Meier方法估计无复发生存期(RFS)和局部肿瘤进展(LTP)的累积发生率,并采用对数秩检验进行比较。根据肿瘤位置在患者亚组中比较两种治疗方式的治疗效果。
LLR和p-RFA的总生存率无显著差异(P = 0.160);然而,LLR后的3年RFS(74.4%)显著高于p-RFA后的(66.0%)(P = 0.013),这是因为其LTP的累积发生率显著更低(LLR后3年为2.1%,p-RFA后为10.0%,P < 0.001)。p-RFA的并发症发生率显著低于LLR(5.1%对10.0%,P = 0.026)。对于肩胛下肿瘤(3年LTP率:1.9%对8.8%,P = 0.012)、血管周围肿瘤(3年LTP率:0.0%对17.2%,P = 0.007)以及位于肝前下外侧部分的肿瘤(3年LTP率:0.0%对10.7%,P < 0.001),LLR的局部肿瘤控制也显著优于p-RFA。然而,对于非包膜下和非血管周围肿瘤(P = 0.482)以及肝后上部分的肿瘤(P = 0.380),LLR和p-RFA的LTP率无显著差异。
对于包膜下、血管周围和肝前下外侧部分的小的单发HCC,LLR的局部肿瘤控制显著优于p-RFA,因此可能是这些肿瘤的首选治疗选择。