Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Mt. Hope Family Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2021 May;49(5):595-601. doi: 10.1007/s10802-021-00801-4. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
In response to the commentaries provided by Chu et al. (2020), Harmon et al. (2020), and McMahon & Maxwell (2020) on our longitudinal follow-up of Child-Parent Psychotherapy (CPP) with mothers with depression and their children, we focus on two domains: accessibility and scalability of CPP and identifying empirically supported mechanisms of change in attachment intervention research. In considering the accessibility and scalability of CPP, we discuss issues related to attrition, length of intervention, and implementation with caregivers with depression. Our discussion of mechanisms of change in attachment interventions explores active comparison conditions, theorized mediators, intervention modalities, assessment methods, and longitudinal research designs. This conversation is intended to highlight important areas for future research in the field of attachment interventions, with the goal of informing clinical and systems-level policies and practices.
针对 Chu 等人(2020 年)、Harmon 等人(2020 年)和 McMahon & Maxwell(2020 年)对我们对患有抑郁症的母亲及其子女进行的儿童-父母心理疗法(CPP)的纵向随访的评论,我们重点关注两个领域:CPP 的可及性和可扩展性,以及确定依恋干预研究中经验支持的变化机制。在考虑 CPP 的可及性和可扩展性时,我们讨论了与患有抑郁症的照顾者相关的脱落、干预时长和实施等问题。我们对依恋干预措施变化机制的讨论探讨了积极的对照条件、理论化的中介因素、干预方式、评估方法和纵向研究设计。本次对话旨在强调依恋干预领域未来研究的重要领域,旨在为临床和系统层面的政策和实践提供信息。