Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2021 May;31(3):331-339. doi: 10.1111/vec.13059. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
To determine whether ease of access to thoracic structures for performing open-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OC-CPR) differed between fourth and fifth intercostal space (ICS) left lateral thoracotomies in dogs, and to determine if "shingling" improved access for OC-CPR manipulations.
Prospective single-blinded study.
Laboratory.
Twelve mixed breed canine cadavers weighing approximately 20 kg.
Left lateral thoracotomies were performed at the 4th ICS (n = 6) or 5th ICS (n = 6). Shingling at the 4th or 5th ICS, as applicable, was performed after initial data collection and outcomes were reassessed.
Three evaluators blinded to the surgical approach scored the following parameters on a 0 to 10 scale (0 = easiest, 10 = most difficult): ease of access of the phrenicopericardial ligament, ease of pericardial incision, ease of appropriate hand position, ease of aortic access, ease of Rumel tourniquet application, and ease of proper placement of defibrillation paddles. Objective measurements (time to completion or number of attempts) were made for all but ease of pericardial incision and ease of appropriate hand position. Outcomes were reassessed after shingling. The 5th ICS was superior for ease of aortic access (P = 0.042), time to visualization of aorta (P = 0.009), and ease of application of a Rumel tourniquet (P = 0.019). When comparing scores pre- and post-shingling, shingling improved time to visualization of the aorta (P < 0.001), time to placement of Rumel tourniquet (P < 0.001), ease of paddle placement (P = 0.017), and time to paddle placement (P < 0.001).
Either 4th or 5th ICS thoracotomy may provide adequate access to intrathoracic structures pertinent to performing OC-CPR in dogs weighing approximately 20 kg, but 5th ICS was preferred for most manipulations, and shingling improved access for most of the measured parameters.
确定在犬进行开胸心肺复苏术(OC-CPR)时,第四和第五肋间(ICS)左侧开胸术是否更容易触及胸部结构,并确定“叠瓦式”是否能改善 OC-CPR 操作的进入。
前瞻性单盲研究。
实验室。
12 只混合品种犬尸体,体重约 20 公斤。
在第四 ICS(n=6)或第五 ICS(n=6)进行左侧开胸术。在最初的数据收集后进行叠瓦式操作,并重新评估结果。
3 名评估员对手术方法不知情,对以下参数进行了 0 到 10 分制评分(0=最容易,10=最难):膈心包韧带的进入难易程度、心包切开的难易程度、合适手位的难易程度、主动脉进入的难易程度、Rumel 止血带的应用难易程度、以及除心包切开和合适手位外,所有参数的除颤板的正确放置的难易程度。除心包切开和合适手位的操作外,所有操作均进行了完成时间或尝试次数的客观测量。在叠瓦式操作后重新评估结果。第五 ICS 在主动脉进入的难易程度(P=0.042)、主动脉可视化的时间(P=0.009)和 Rumel 止血带的应用难易程度(P=0.019)方面更具优势。比较叠瓦式操作前后的评分,叠瓦式操作改善了主动脉可视化的时间(P<0.001)、Rumel 止血带放置的时间(P<0.001)、除颤板放置的难易程度(P=0.017)和除颤板放置的时间(P<0.001)。
在体重约 20 公斤的犬进行 OC-CPR 时,第四或第五 ICS 开胸术都可以提供足够的进入胸腔内结构的通道,但第五 ICS 更适合大多数操作,叠瓦式操作改善了大多数测量参数的进入通道。