University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Med Care Res Rev. 2022 Apr;79(2):233-243. doi: 10.1177/1077558721998924. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services implemented the Inpatient Psychiatric Facility Quality Reporting Program in 2012, which publicly reports facilities' performance on restraint and seclusion (R-S) measures. Using data from Massachusetts, we examined whether nonprofits and for-profits responded differently to the program on targeted indicators, and if the program had a differential spillover effect on nontargeted indicators of quality by ownership. Episodes of R-S (targeted), complaints (nontargeted), and discharges were obtained for 2008-2017 through public records requests to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Using difference-in-differences estimators, we found no differential changes in R-S between for-profits and nonprofits. However, for-profits had larger increases in overall complaints, safety-related complaints, abuse-related complaints, and R-S-related complaints compared with nonprofits. This is the first study to examine the effects of a national public reporting program among psychiatric facilities on nontargeted measures. Researchers and policymakers should further scrutinize intended and unintended consequences of performance-reporting programs.
医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心于 2012 年实施了住院精神病院质量报告计划,该计划公开报告了各机构在约束和隔离(R-S)措施方面的表现。我们利用马萨诸塞州的数据,研究了非营利组织和营利组织对目标指标的反应是否不同,以及该计划对所有权的非目标质量指标是否有不同的外溢效应。通过向马萨诸塞州政府公开记录请求,我们获得了 2008 年至 2017 年的 R-S(目标)、投诉(非目标)和出院数据。使用差分差异估计量,我们发现营利性和非营利性精神病院之间的 R-S 没有差异变化。然而,与非营利组织相比,营利性组织的总投诉、与安全相关的投诉、与虐待相关的投诉以及与 R-S 相关的投诉增加幅度更大。这是第一项研究报告在全国范围内报告精神病院的绩效报告计划对非目标措施的影响。研究人员和政策制定者应进一步审查绩效报告计划的预期和非预期后果。