Morgan C. Shields (
Maureen T. Stewart is a scientist at the Institute for Behavioral Health, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Nov;37(11):1853-1861. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0718.
Behavioral health care has been slow to take up robust efforts to improve patient safety. This lag is especially apparent in inpatient psychiatry, where there is risk for physical and psychological harm. Recent investigative journalism has provoked public concern about instances of alleged abuse, negligence, understaffing, sexual assault, inappropriate medication use, patient self-harm, poor sanitation, and inappropriate restraint and seclusion. However, empirical evidence describing the scope of unsafe experiences is limited. While evidence-based inpatient psychiatry requires care to be trauma-informed, market failures and a lack of payment alignment with patient-centered care leave patients vulnerable to harm. Existing regulatory mechanisms attempt to provide accountability; however, these mechanisms are imperfect. Furthermore, research is sparse. Few health services researchers study inpatient psychiatry, the issue has not been a priority among research funders, and data on inpatient psychiatry is excluded from national surveys of quality. Several policy levers could begin to address these deficiencies. These include aligning incentives with patient-centered care, building trauma-informed care into accreditation and monitoring, conducting trend analyses of critical incidents, and improving research capacity.
行为健康护理在加强患者安全方面进展缓慢。这种滞后在住院精神病学中尤为明显,因为那里存在身体和心理伤害的风险。最近的调查性新闻报道引起了公众对涉嫌虐待、疏忽、人手不足、性侵犯、不当用药、患者自残、卫生条件差以及不当约束和隔离的关注。然而,描述不安全体验范围的实证证据有限。尽管基于证据的住院精神病学需要以创伤知情为基础,但市场失灵和与以患者为中心的护理不符的支付方式使患者容易受到伤害。现有的监管机制试图提供问责制;然而,这些机制并不完善。此外,研究也很匮乏。很少有卫生服务研究人员研究住院精神病学,研究资金也没有将该问题作为优先事项,而且全国性的质量调查也没有包括住院精神病学的数据。一些政策杠杆可以开始解决这些不足。这些措施包括将激励措施与以患者为中心的护理相协调,将创伤知情护理纳入认证和监测,对关键事件进行趋势分析,以及提高研究能力。