Suppr超能文献

左乙拉西坦对比苯妥英或磷苯妥英治疗儿童癫痫持续状态的二线治疗:一项荟萃分析。

Levetiracetam Versus Phenytoin or Fosphenytoin for Second-Line Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus: A Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2021 Sep 1;22(9):e480-e491. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002703.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize the available evidence examining the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam compared with phenytoin or fosphenytoin in benzodiazepine-refractory pediatric status epilepticus.

DATA SOURCES

We searched (from inception until April 27, 2020) Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.

STUDY SELECTION

Two reviewers, independently and in duplicate, screened citations and manuscripts for eligible randomized controlled trials.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Independently and in duplicate, we performed data abstraction, risk of bias assessment, and certainty assessment using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. We performed meta-analyses using random-effect models or, if insufficient data, presented findings narratively.

RESULTS

We identified seven randomized controlled trials (n = 1,575). Pooled analysis demonstrated low certainty evidence for no difference of levetiracetam on time to seizure cessation (mean difference, -3.11 min; 95% CI, -6.67 to 0.45), early seizure cessation (relative risk, 1.09, 95% CI, 0.95-1.26), or late seizure cessation (relative risk, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.93-1.18). Adverse event outcomes were limited by low event numbers. We found low certainty evidence for less respiratory depression with levetiracetam (relative risk, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.12-0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of levetiracetam is comparable with phenytoin or fosphenytoin in children with benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus (low certainty evidence). Levetiracetam may cause less respiratory depression. Clinicians and guideline developers should weigh safety profiles when choosing between these agents.

摘要

目的

综合评估左乙拉西坦对比苯妥英或磷苯妥英治疗苯二氮䓬类药物难治性小儿癫痫持续状态的疗效和安全性。

资料来源

我们检索了 Ovid MEDLINE、EMBASE、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(截至 2020 年 4 月 27 日)。

研究选择

两位审查员独立并重复筛选了参考文献和手稿以确定是否符合纳入标准的随机对照试验。

资料提取和综合

我们独立并重复进行了数据提取、偏倚风险评估和使用 Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation 进行确定性评估。我们使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,或者如果数据不足,则进行叙述性分析。

结果

我们共确定了 7 项随机对照试验(n=1575)。汇总分析显示,左乙拉西坦在停止癫痫发作时间(平均差异,-3.11 分钟;95%置信区间,-6.67 至 0.45)、早期癫痫发作停止(相对风险,1.09;95%置信区间,0.95-1.26)或晚期癫痫发作停止(相对风险,1.05;95%置信区间,0.93-1.18)方面的疗效无差异,证据确定性为低。不良反应结局受低事件数的限制。我们发现左乙拉西坦较少引起呼吸抑制的证据确定性为低(相对风险,0.28;95%置信区间,0.12-0.69)。

结论

在治疗苯二氮䓬类药物难治性癫痫持续状态的儿童中,左乙拉西坦与苯妥英或磷苯妥英的疗效相当(低确定性证据)。左乙拉西坦可能引起较少的呼吸抑制。临床医生和指南制定者在选择这些药物时应权衡安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验