Suppr超能文献

左乙拉西坦与苯妥英钠治疗儿童惊厥性癫痫持续状态的二线抗癫痫药物疗效和安全性的系统评价和 Meta 分析。

Efficacy and Safety of Levetiracetam vs. Phenytoin as Second Line Antiseizure Medication for Pediatric Convulsive Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh 160012, India.

Pediatric Neurology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh 160012, India.

出版信息

J Trop Pediatr. 2021 May 17;67(2). doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmab014.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam (LEV) in comparison to phenytoin (PHT) as second line antiseizure medication (ASM) for Pediatric convulsive status epilepticus (SE).

DATA SOURCE

PubMed, Embase, Google scholar/Google, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing LEV and PHT as second line agent for convulsive SE in children <18 years published between 1 January 2000 and 30 November 2020.

DATA EXTRACTION

The data were pooled regarding the proportion of children achieving seizure cessation within 5-60 min of completion of study drug infusion (primary outcome); and seizure cessation within 5 min, time to achieve seizure cessation, seizure recurrence between 1 to 24 h, intubation and cardiovascular instability (secondary outcomes). Data were analyzed using RevMan version 5.4 and quality analysis was done using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Twelve RCTs with 2293 children were included. Seizure cessation within 5-60 min was similar with both the drugs [82% in LEV vs. 77.5% in PHT, risk ratio (RR) = 1.04, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.97-1.11, p = 0.30]. Seizure recurrences within 1-24 h was higher with PHT in comparison to LEV (16.6% vs. 9.7%, RR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.44-0.90, p = 0.01). Higher proportion of children in PHT group required intubation and mechanical ventilation (21.4% vs. 14.2%, RR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.30-0.98, p = 0.04). Seizure cessation within 5 min, time to achieve seizure cessation, and cardiovascular instability were similar with both the drugs. Three RCTs were at low risk of bias and nine were at high risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of LEV is similar to PHT as second line ASM for Pediatric convulsive SE. Seizure recurrences between 1 to24 h and requirement of intubation and mechanical ventilation were significantly higher with PHT in comparison to LEV.

摘要

目的

评估左乙拉西坦(LEV)与苯妥英(PHT)相比作为儿科惊厥性癫痫持续状态(SE)二线抗癫痫药物(ASM)的疗效和安全性。

资料来源

PubMed、Embase、Google Scholar/Google、Scopus、护理学和联合健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)、Cochrane 系统评价数据库和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库。

研究选择

2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 11 月 30 日期间发表的评估 LEV 和 PHT 作为儿童 <18 岁惊厥性 SE 二线药物的随机对照试验(RCT)。

数据提取

关于研究药物输注完成后 5-60 分钟内儿童达到癫痫发作停止的比例(主要结局);以及 5 分钟内癫痫发作停止、达到癫痫发作停止的时间、1-24 小时内癫痫发作复发、插管和心血管不稳定(次要结局)的数据进行了汇总。使用 RevMan 版本 5.4 进行数据分析,并使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具进行质量分析。该研究方案已在 PROSPERO 上注册。

数据综合

纳入 12 项 RCT,共 2293 名儿童。两种药物的癫痫发作停止率在 5-60 分钟内相似[82%在 LEV 组与 77.5%在 PHT 组,风险比(RR)=1.04,95%置信区间(95%CI)0.97-1.11,p=0.30]。与 LEV 相比,PHT 组在 1-24 小时内癫痫发作复发的比例更高(16.6% vs. 9.7%,RR=0.63,95%CI 0.44-0.90,p=0.01)。PHT 组需要插管和机械通气的儿童比例较高(21.4% vs. 14.2%,RR=0.54,95%CI 0.30-0.98,p=0.04)。两种药物的癫痫发作停止 5 分钟内、达到癫痫发作停止的时间和心血管不稳定情况相似。有 3 项 RCT 为低偏倚风险,9 项为高偏倚风险。

结论

LEV 的疗效与 PHT 作为儿科惊厥性 SE 的二线 ASM 相似。与 LEV 相比,PHT 在 1-24 小时内癫痫发作复发以及需要插管和机械通气的比例显著更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验