• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鲍曼的“液态现代性”是否影响我们做科学的方式?

Is Bauman's "liquid modernity" influencing the way we are doing science?

机构信息

Centro de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares, Centro Científico Tennológico-La Plata-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Uiversidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina.

出版信息

J Gen Physiol. 2021 May 3;153(5). doi: 10.1085/jgp.202012803.

DOI:10.1085/jgp.202012803
PMID:33710262
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7961533/
Abstract

This commentary analyzes the possible effects of lightness-a typical attribute of modern (liquid) society, according to Bauman-on the way we are doing science. We share our opinion in an attempt to discern whether some unwanted practices that may affect our scientific results (such as technology misuse, bonus rewards, publishing under pressure, or indolence for getting accurate results) can be attributed, at least partially, to the liquid characteristic of modern society. We also examine whether the different systems that support science favor these actions, conspiring against what should be the primary goal of science: the search for truth. We finally consider several aspects that should be taken into account to rescue science from the intrusion of weightless actions.

摘要

译文:本文分析了鲍曼(Bauman)所定义的现代(液态)社会的典型特征——轻佻,对我们做科学的方式可能产生的影响。我们分享自己的观点,试图辨别某些可能影响我们科研成果的不良做法(例如滥用技术、奖励津贴、迫于压力发表文章,或者懒得获取准确结果)是否至少部分归因于现代社会的液态特征。我们还探讨了支持科学的不同体系是否助长了这些行为,是否与科学的首要目标——追求真理——背道而驰。最后,我们考虑了一些应予以考虑的方面,以防止科学受到失重行为的干扰。

相似文献

1
Is Bauman's "liquid modernity" influencing the way we are doing science?鲍曼的“液态现代性”是否影响我们做科学的方式?
J Gen Physiol. 2021 May 3;153(5). doi: 10.1085/jgp.202012803.
2
Is Bauman's bureau Weber's bureau?: a comment.鲍曼的官僚机构是韦伯的官僚机构吗?:一则评论。
Br J Sociol. 1999 Dec;50(4):575-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.1999.00575.x.
3
Correlation between Bauman's and carrying angle in children with supracondylar fracture of humerus.儿童肱骨髁上骨折时鲍曼角与提携角的相关性
Med Arch. 2013;67(3):195-7. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2013.67.195-197.
4
Surviving death-anxieties in liquid modern times: examining Zygmunt Bauman's cultural theory of death and dying.在液态现代中直面死亡焦虑:检验齐格蒙特·鲍曼的死亡文化理论。
Omega (Westport). 2012;65(3):221-38. doi: 10.2190/OM.65.3.e.
5
Zygmunt Bauman's poisoned gift of morality.齐格蒙特·鲍曼那有毒的道德馈赠。
Br J Sociol. 2001 Mar;52(1):105-19. doi: 10.1080/00071310020023055.
6
The role of IS in the covid-19 pandemic: A liquid-modern perspective.信息系统在新冠疫情中的作用:一种流动现代性视角
Int J Inf Manage. 2020 Dec;55:102184. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102184. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
7
Solid and liquid modernity: A comparison of the social geography of places to die in the UK and Australia.固态现代性与液态现代性:英国和澳大利亚死亡地点的社会地理学比较。
Death Stud. 2017 Feb;41(2):103-111. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2016.1225858. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
8
Blogs and the Art of Dying: Blogging With, and About, Severe Cancer in Late Modern Swedish Society.博客与临终艺术:晚期现代瑞典社会中患有严重癌症的博客写作及相关内容
Omega (Westport). 2019 Sep;79(4):394-413. doi: 10.1177/0030222817719806. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
9
Zygmunt Bauman. Individual and society in the liquid modernity.齐格蒙特·鲍曼。流动现代性中的个体与社会。
Springerplus. 2013 Apr 29;2(1):191. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-191. eCollection 2013.
10
The evolution of physical activity promotion. Are we entering a liquid age?体力活动促进的演变。我们是否正进入一个液态时代?
Glob Health Promot. 2020 Dec;27(4):15-23. doi: 10.1177/1757975919882381. Epub 2019 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
The artificial intelligence revolution...in unethical publishing: Will AI worsen our dysfunctional publishing system?人工智能革命……在不道德的出版领域:人工智能会恶化我们功能失调的出版系统吗?
J Gen Physiol. 2024 Nov 4;156(11). doi: 10.1085/jgp.202413654. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
2
Unveiling the ethical void: Bias in reference citations and its academic ramifications.揭示道德空白:参考文献引用中的偏见及其学术影响。
Curr Res Physiol. 2024 Jul 26;7:100130. doi: 10.1016/j.crphys.2024.100130. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Pseudoreplication in physiology: More means less.生理学中的伪重复:越多意味着越少。
J Gen Physiol. 2021 Feb 1;153(2). doi: 10.1085/jgp.202012826.
2
China bans cash rewards for publishing papers.中国禁止对发表论文给予现金奖励。
Nature. 2020 Mar;579(7797):18. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-00574-8.
3
Why grit requires perseverance and passion to positively predict performance.为什么坚毅需要毅力和激情才能积极预测表现。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Oct 2;115(40):9980-9985. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1803561115. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
4
Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days.数以千计的科学家每五天发表一篇论文。
Nature. 2018 Sep;561(7722):167-169. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-06185-8.
5
Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?观点:科学真的面临可重复性危机了吗?我们需要解决它吗?
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2628-2631. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708272114.
6
Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure.在“不发表就出局”压力下对科学可信度进行建模。
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Jan 10;5(1):171511. doi: 10.1098/rsos.171511. eCollection 2018 Jan.
7
Reproducibility of science: Fraud, impact factors and carelessness.科学的可重复性:造假、影响因子和粗心大意。
J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2018 Jan;114:364-368. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2017.10.009. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
8
Cash incentives for papers go global.论文现金奖励在全球范围内盛行。
Science. 2017 Aug 11;357(6351):541. doi: 10.1126/science.357.6351.541.
9
Much ado about grit: A meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature.《坚毅研究文献的元分析综合》
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Sep;113(3):492-511. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000102. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
10
Beat it, impact factor! Publishing elite turns against controversial metric.别再提影响因子了!出版界精英开始反对这一颇具争议的指标。
Nature. 2016 Jul 14;535(7611):210-1. doi: 10.1038/nature.2016.20224.