• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对比不同制备技术对冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)血管壁厚度的影响:HArVeST 随机对照试验

Comparison of alternate preparative techniques on wall thickness in coronary artery bypass grafts: The HArVeST randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

J Card Surg. 2021 Jun;36(6):1985-1995. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15477. Epub 2021 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1111/jocs.15477
PMID:33710658
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The success of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG) is dependent on long-term graft patency, which is negatively related to early wall thickening. Avoiding high-pressure distension testing for leaks and preserving the surrounding pedicle of fat and adventitia during vein harvesting may reduce wall thickening.

METHODS

A single-centre, factorial randomized controlled trial was carried out to compare the impact of testing for leaks under high versus low pressure and harvesting the vein with versus without the pedicle in patients undergoing CABG. The primary outcomes were graft wall thickness, as indicator of medial-intimal hyperplasia, and lumen diameter assessed using intravascular ultrasound after 12 months.

RESULTS

Ninety-six eligible participants were recruited. With conventional harvest, low-pressure testing tended to yield a thinner vessel wall compared with high-pressure (mean difference [MD; low minus high] -0.059 mm, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.12, +0.0039, p = .066). With high pressure testing, veins harvested with the pedicle fat tended to have a thinner vessel wall than those harvested conventionally (MD [pedicle minus conventional] -0.057 mm, 95% CI: -0.12, +0.0037, p = .066, test for interaction p = .07). Lumen diameter was similar across groups (harvest comparison p = .81; pressure comparison p = .24). Low-pressure testing was associated with fewer hospital admissions in the 12 months following surgery (p = .0008). Harvesting the vein with the pedicle fat was associated with more complications during the index admission (p = .0041).

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional saphenous vein graft preparation with low-pressure distension and harvesting the vein with a surrounding pedicle yielded similar graft wall thickness after 12 months, but low pressure was associated with fewer adverse events.

摘要

背景

冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的成功取决于移植物的长期通畅性,而通畅性与早期壁增厚呈负相关。避免对渗漏进行高压扩张测试,并在静脉采集过程中保留周围的脂肪和外膜蒂,可以减少壁增厚。

方法

进行了一项单中心、析因随机对照试验,比较了在 CABG 患者中对渗漏进行高压与低压测试以及带蒂与不带蒂采集静脉对移植物壁厚度(作为中膜-内膜增生的指标)和 12 个月后血管内超声评估的管腔直径的影响。

结果

共招募了 96 名符合条件的参与者。与传统采集相比,低压测试倾向于使血管壁更薄(低压与高压之间的平均差异[MD] -0.059mm,95%置信区间[CI] -0.12,+0.0039,p=0.066)。在高压测试时,与传统采集相比,带蒂脂肪采集的静脉壁更薄(蒂与传统采集之间的 MD [pedicle minus conventional] -0.057mm,95% CI:-0.12,+0.0037,p=0.066,检验交互作用 p=0.07)。各组之间的管腔直径相似(采集比较 p=0.81;压力比较 p=0.24)。低压测试与术后 12 个月内住院次数减少相关(p=0.0008)。带蒂脂肪采集与住院期间发生更多并发症相关(p=0.0041)。

结论

在 12 个月后,传统的大隐静脉移植物准备采用低压扩张和带蒂采集静脉,移植物壁厚度相似,但低压与较少的不良事件相关。

相似文献

1
Comparison of alternate preparative techniques on wall thickness in coronary artery bypass grafts: The HArVeST randomized controlled trial.对比不同制备技术对冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)血管壁厚度的影响:HArVeST 随机对照试验
J Card Surg. 2021 Jun;36(6):1985-1995. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15477. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
2
SUPERIOR SVG: no touch saphenous harvesting to improve patency following coronary bypass grafting (a multi-Centre randomized control trial, NCT01047449).大隐静脉桥:冠状动脉搭桥术后采用非接触式大隐静脉采集以提高通畅率(一项多中心随机对照试验,NCT01047449)
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 May 2;14(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13019-019-0887-x.
3
External stenting and disease progression in saphenous vein grafts two years after coronary artery bypass grafting: A multicenter randomized trial.冠状动脉旁路移植术后 2 年,体外支架和隐静脉移植物病变进展:一项多中心随机试验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Nov;164(5):1532-1541.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.03.120. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
4
Early quantitative coronary angiography of saphenous vein grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting harvested by means of open versus endoscopic saphenectomy: a prospective randomized trial.采用开放与内镜大隐静脉切除术获取的用于冠状动脉旁路移植术的大隐静脉移植物的早期定量冠状动脉造影:一项前瞻性随机试验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 May;127(5):1402-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.10.040.
5
Improved patency in vein grafts harvested with surrounding tissue: results of a randomized study using three harvesting techniques.采用周围组织获取静脉移植物的通畅性改善:一项使用三种获取技术的随机研究结果
Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Apr;73(4):1189-95. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03425-2.
6
What is the impact of preserving the endothelium on saphenous vein graft performance? Comments on the 'NO' touch harvesting technique.保留血管内皮对大隐静脉移植物性能的影响如何?对“无接触”采集技术的评价。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Mar 16;16(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01397-y.
7
Harvesting the saphenous vein with surrounding tissue for CABG provides long-term graft patency comparable to the left internal thoracic artery: results of a randomized longitudinal trial.采集带周围组织的大隐静脉用于冠状动脉旁路移植术可提供与左内乳动脉相当的长期移植血管通畅率:一项随机纵向试验的结果
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Aug;132(2):373-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.04.002.
8
External Support for Saphenous Vein Grafts in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.冠状动脉旁路移植术中游离隐静脉移植物的外部支撑:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Aug 1;7(8):808-816. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.1437.
9
Impact of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest technique on late coronary artery bypass grafting patient outcomes in the ROOBY (Randomized On/Off Bypass) Trial.ROOBY(随机开/闭旁路试验)研究中内镜与开放隐静脉采集技术对晚期冠状动脉旁路移植术患者结局的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Feb;141(2):338-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.10.004. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
10
Long-term performance of an external stent for saphenous vein grafts: the VEST IV trial.隐静脉移植血管外部支架的长期性能:VEST IV试验
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Nov 19;13(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13019-018-0803-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative efficacy and safety of no-touch versus conventional vein harvesting techniques in coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.冠状动脉搭桥术中非接触式与传统静脉采集技术的疗效和安全性比较:系统评价与荟萃分析
Open Heart. 2025 Jul 21;12(2):e003391. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2025-003391.
2
Graft patency of no-touch versus conventionally harvested saphenous vein conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting: A frequentist and Bayesian meta-analysis of randomized trials.冠状动脉搭桥术中非接触式与传统获取的大隐静脉移植物的通畅率:随机试验的频率论和贝叶斯荟萃分析
JTCVS Open. 2025 Feb 21;24:185-205. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.02.007. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
No-touch technique for saphenous vein graft harvesting in coronary artery bypass surgery safely improves graft patency: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
冠状动脉搭桥手术中隐静脉移植获取的非接触技术可安全提高移植血管通畅率:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Jan;41(1):7-17. doi: 10.1007/s12055-024-01788-5. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
4
'No-touch' or 'soft-touch' vein graft harvesting for CABG.冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的“非接触式”或“轻柔接触式”静脉移植物获取
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Jan;41(1):4-6. doi: 10.1007/s12055-024-01846-y. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
5
Impact of distension pressure on saphenous vein endothelial injury in coronary artery bypass grafting.扩张压力对冠状动脉搭桥术中隐静脉内皮损伤的影响
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Jul;40(4):424-432. doi: 10.1007/s12055-024-01731-8. Epub 2024 Apr 13.
6
Outcomes after surgical revascularization in diabetic patients.糖尿病患者手术血管重建后的结果。
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2024 Feb 2;38(2). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivae014.
7
The Role of Preservation Solutions upon Saphenous Vein Endothelial Integrity and Function: Systematic Review and UK Practice Survey.保存液对大隐静脉内皮完整性和功能的作用:系统评价和英国实践调查。
Cells. 2023 Mar 6;12(5):815. doi: 10.3390/cells12050815.