Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Biochem Pharmacol. 2021 Sep;191:114504. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2021.114504. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
Intermittent light (IML) pulses are more efficient per minute of exposure than continuous exposure in resetting the phase of the human circadian pacemaker. We assessed the spectral sensitivity in phase resetting, melatonin suppression and alertness induced by IML pulses. Twelve healthy young adults (6 females; mean age ± SD = 25.4 ± 3.6 years) were exposed to six monochromatic light pulses (2.8 × 10 photons/cm/s) over a 6.5 h window during the biological night. Six participants (3F) received 6 × 15-minute 460 nm (blue) pulses and six participants received 6 × 2-minute 555 nm (green) light pulses. Results were compared to historical data in 16 individuals who received continuous 460 nm (n = 8) or 555 nm (n = 8) light exposure using an identical protocol. As expected, long duration continuous 460 nm light exposure induced the largest total phase delay shifts, but intermittent 555 nm light induced the largest phase delay shifts per minute of the photic stimulus. Melatonin suppression was significantly higher under continuous light exposure compared to intermittent exposure patterns, and for 460 nm versus 555 nm exposure (under both light patterns). These data extend prior work showing a non-linear relationship between light exposure duration and phase resetting responses and illustrate the potential role of light wavelength, and therefore photoreceptor recruitment, in mediating these responses.
间歇性光照 (IML) 脉冲在重置人体昼夜节律起搏器相位方面,每一分钟的暴露效率都比连续暴露高。我们评估了 IML 脉冲在相位重置、褪黑素抑制和警觉性方面引起的光谱敏感性。12 名健康年轻成年人(6 名女性;平均年龄 ± 标准差 = 25.4 ± 3.6 岁)在生物夜间的 6.5 小时窗口内接受了 6 个单色光脉冲(2.8 × 10 个光子/cm/s)。6 名参与者(3 名女性)接受了 6 个 15 分钟的 460nm(蓝色)脉冲,而 6 名参与者接受了 6 个 2 分钟的 555nm(绿色)光脉冲。结果与使用相同方案接受连续 460nm(n=8)或 555nm(n=8)光照射的 16 名个体的历史数据进行了比较。正如预期的那样,长时间的连续 460nm 光照射诱导的总相位延迟变化最大,但间歇性 555nm 光照射诱导的光刺激每分钟的相位延迟变化最大。与间歇性暴露模式相比,连续光照下褪黑素抑制明显更高,与 460nm 相比 555nm 暴露(在两种光照模式下)也是如此。这些数据扩展了先前的工作,表明光暴露持续时间与相位重置反应之间存在非线性关系,并说明了光波长的潜在作用,以及因此光感受器招募,在介导这些反应中的作用。