Hartstein Lauren E, Wright Kenneth P, Diniz Behn Cecilia, Stowe Shelby R, LeBourgeois Monique K
Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado.
Department of Psychiatry, The University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, Arizona.
J Biol Rhythms. 2025 Apr;40(2):181-193. doi: 10.1177/07487304241311652. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
Although the sensitivity of the circadian system to the characteristics of light (e.g., biological timing, intensity, duration, spectrum) has been well studied in adults, data in early childhood remain limited. Utilizing a crossover, within-subjects design, we examined differences in the circadian response to evening light exposure at two different correlated color temperatures (CCT) in preschool-aged children. Healthy, good sleeping children ( = 10, 3.0-5.9 years) completed two 10-day protocols. In each protocol, after maintaining a stable sleep schedule for 7 days, a 3-day in-home dim-light circadian assessment was performed. On the first and third evenings of the in-home protocol, dim-light melatonin onset (DLMO) was assessed. On the second evening, children received a 1-h light exposure of 20 lux from either 2700 K (low CCT) or 5000 K (high CCT) (~9 and ~16 melanopic equivalent daylight illuminance (mEDI lux), respectively) centered around their habitual bedtime. Children received the remaining light condition during their second protocol, with the order counterbalanced across participants. Salivary melatonin was collected to compute melatonin suppression and circadian phase shift resulting from each experimental light condition. Melatonin suppression across the 1-h light stimulus was significantly greater during exposure to the high CCT light ( = 56.3%, = 19.25%) than during the low CCT light ( = 23.90%, = 41.06%). Both light conditions resulted in marked delays of circadian timing, but only a small difference ( = -0.25) was observed in the delay between the 5000 K ( = 35.3 min, = 34.3 min) and 2700 K ( = 26.7 min, = 15.9 min) conditions. Together, these findings add to a growing literature demonstrating high responsivity of the circadian clock to evening light exposure in early childhood and provide preliminary evidence of melatonin suppression sensitivity to differences in light spectrum in preschool-aged children.
尽管昼夜节律系统对光的特性(如生物定时、强度、持续时间、光谱)的敏感性在成年人中已得到充分研究,但幼儿期的数据仍然有限。我们采用交叉、受试者内设计,研究了学龄前儿童在两种不同相关色温(CCT)下对傍晚光照的昼夜节律反应差异。健康、睡眠良好的儿童(n = 10,3.0 - 5.9岁)完成了两个为期10天的方案。在每个方案中,在保持稳定睡眠时间表7天后,进行了为期3天的家中暗光昼夜节律评估。在家中方案的第一个和第三个晚上,评估暗光褪黑素开始分泌时间(DLMO)。在第二个晚上,孩子们在习惯就寝时间前后接受了1小时20勒克斯的光照,光照来自2700K(低CCT)或5000K(高CCT)(分别约为9和16黑素等效日光照度(mEDI勒克斯))。孩子们在第二个方案中接受剩余的光照条件,顺序在参与者之间进行了平衡。收集唾液褪黑素以计算每种实验光照条件下的褪黑素抑制和昼夜节律相移。在暴露于高CCT光(n = 56.3%,SD = 19.25%)期间,1小时光照刺激下的褪黑素抑制明显大于低CCT光(n = 23.90%,SD = 41.06%)期间。两种光照条件都导致昼夜节律时间明显延迟,但在5000K(n = 35.3分钟,SD = 34.3分钟)和2700K(n = 26.7分钟,SD = 15.9分钟)条件之间的延迟中仅观察到微小差异(MD = -0.25)。总之,这些发现进一步丰富了越来越多的文献,证明了昼夜节律时钟在幼儿期对傍晚光照的高反应性,并为学龄前儿童褪黑素抑制对光谱差异的敏感性提供了初步证据。