Suppr超能文献

内镜超声引导下良性胆道病变伴正常前肠解剖的胆道引流:一项多中心研究。

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage in benign biliary pathology with normal foregut anatomy: a multicenter study.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, USA.

University of Illinois College of Medicine - Peoria, 5105 North Glen Park Place, Peoria, IL, 61614, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):1362-1368. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08418-w. Epub 2021 Mar 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Biliary drainage using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS-BD) has been developed as a novel technique to obtain biliary access and drainage when ERCP fails. Numerous studies have demonstrated its safety and efficacy specifically pertaining to those with malignant distal biliary obstruction or altered foregut anatomy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EUS-BD in benign indications in patients with normal foregut anatomy.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective comparative study from 5 academic medical centers (2008-2018) involving patients with benign biliary obstruction and native foregut anatomy who had an initial failed ERCP with subsequent attempt at biliary decompression via EUS-BD or by repeating ERCP.

RESULTS

36 patients (mean age 61.6 ± 2.2, 38.9% female) who underwent attempted EUS-BD following initial failed ERCP were compared to 50 patients (mean age 62.7 ± 2.3, 73.5% female) who underwent repeat ERCP following an initial failed cannulation. EUS-BD was technically successful in 28 (77.8%) patients with rendezvous being the most common approach (86.1%). A higher level of pre-procedural bilirubin was found to be associated with technical success of EUS-BD (3.65 ± 0.63 versus 1.1 ± 0.4, p value 0.04). Success of repeat ERCP following failed cannulation was 86%. Adverse events were significantly more frequent in the EUS-BD cohort when compared to the repeat ERCP (10 (27.8%) versus 4 (8.0%), p = 0.02, OR 4.32.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-BD remains a viable therapeutic option in the setting of benign biliary disease, with success rates of 77.8%. Adverse events were significantly more common with EUS-BD vs. repeat ERCP, emphasizing the need to perform in expert centers with appropriate multidisciplinary support and to strongly consider the urgency of biliary decompression before considering same session EUS-BD after failed initial biliary access.

摘要

背景与目的

内镜超声引导下胆道引流术(EUS-BD)作为一种新的技术,已被开发用于在 ERCP 失败时获得胆道入路和引流。许多研究表明,EUS-BD 对于恶性远端胆道梗阻或改变的前肠解剖结构具有安全性和有效性。本研究旨在评估 EUS-BD 在具有正常前肠解剖结构的良性适应证中的安全性和有效性。

方法

我们对 5 家学术医疗中心(2008-2018 年)进行了回顾性对比研究,涉及初始 ERCP 失败后具有良性胆道梗阻和正常前肠解剖结构的患者,他们随后通过 EUS-BD 或重复 ERCP 进行胆道减压。

结果

36 例(平均年龄 61.6±2.2,38.9%为女性)在初次 ERCP 失败后行 EUS-BD 尝试的患者与 50 例(平均年龄 62.7±2.3,73.5%为女性)在初次插管失败后行重复 ERCP 的患者进行了比较。28 例(77.8%)患者 EUS-BD 技术成功, rendezvous 是最常见的方法(86.1%)。术前胆红素水平较高与 EUS-BD 技术成功相关(3.65±0.63 与 1.1±0.4,p 值=0.04)。重复 ERCP 后,失败插管的成功率为 86%。EUS-BD 组的不良事件明显多于重复 ERCP 组(10 例[27.8%]与 4 例[8.0%],p=0.02,OR 4.32)。

结论

EUS-BD 仍然是良性胆道疾病的一种可行的治疗选择,成功率为 77.8%。EUS-BD 组的不良事件明显多于重复 ERCP 组,这强调了在有适当多学科支持的专家中心进行操作的必要性,并在考虑初次胆道入路失败后即刻行 EUS-BD 之前,强烈考虑胆道减压的紧迫性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验