Suppr超能文献

两种肌肉内镇静方案对镇静和献血后猫的超声心动图变量的影响。

The effects of two intramuscular sedation protocols on echocardiographic variables in cats following sedation and blood donation.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences, Cummings Veterinary Medical Center at Tufts University, North Grafton, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2021 Mar;31(2):256-262. doi: 10.1111/vec.13058. Epub 2021 Mar 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare effects of 2 IM sedation protocols, alfaxalone-butorphanol (AB) versus dexmedetomidine-butorphanol (DB), on echocardiographic (ECHO) variables in cats following sedation and blood donation.

DESIGN

Experimental randomized, blinded crossover study.

SETTING

University teaching hospital.

ANIMALS

Eleven client-owned healthy cats.

INTERVENTIONS

Cats received a baseline ECHO without sedation prior to their first donation. Cats were sedated intramuscularly with AB (alfaxalone, 2 mg/kg, and butorphanol, 0.2 mg/kg) for 1 donation and DB (dexmedetomidine, 10 μg/kg, and butorphanol 0.2, mg/kg) for another, with a minimum 6 weeks between donations. A post-sedation, post-donation ECHO was performed after each blood donation.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Eight cats completed the study. Compared to baseline, DB combined with blood donation decreased heart rate (-84/min; P < 0.0001), fractional shortening (-16.5%; P < 0.0001), ejection fraction (-21.0%; P = 0.0002), and cardiac output (-292 mL/min, P = 0.0001); AB combined with blood donation increased heart rate (+45/min; P = 0.0003) and decreased left ventricular end diastolic volume (-1.57 mL; P < 0.0001). Compared to AB, DB decreased heart rate (-129/min; P < 0.0001) and fractional shortening (-21.6%; P < 0.0001) and increased left ventricular end-systolic (+1.14 mL; P = 0.0004) and diastolic volumes (+1.93 mL; P < 0.0002). Cats administered DB had a significant increase in regurgitant flow across mitral, aortic, and pulmonic valves following blood donation (P < 0.05). One cat administered DB developed spontaneous echo contrast in the left ventricle following donation.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Compared to AB, DB had more pronounced effects on ECHO variables in cats following IM sedation and blood donation. Due to its minimal impact on ECHO variables, AB may be a more desirable sedation protocol in this population of cats.

摘要

目的

比较两种 IM 镇静方案(阿法沙龙-丁丙诺啡[AB]与右美托咪定-丁丙诺啡[DB])对镇静和捐血后猫的超声心动图(ECHO)变量的影响。

设计

实验性随机、双盲交叉研究。

设置

大学教学医院。

动物

11 只来自客户的健康猫。

干预

在第一次捐血前,猫在没有镇静的情况下接受基线 ECHO。猫接受 IM 镇静,AB(阿法沙龙 2mg/kg 和丁丙诺啡 0.2mg/kg)用于 1 次捐血,DB(右美托咪定 10μg/kg 和丁丙诺啡 0.2mg/kg)用于另 1 次捐血,两次捐血之间至少间隔 6 周。每次捐血后进行镇静后、捐血后 ECHO。

测量和主要结果

8 只猫完成了研究。与基线相比,DB 结合捐血会降低心率(-84/min;P<0.0001)、缩短分数(-16.5%;P<0.0001)、射血分数(-21.0%;P=0.0002)和心输出量(-292mL/min,P=0.0001);AB 结合捐血会增加心率(+45/min;P=0.0003)和减少左心室舒张末期容积(-1.57mL;P<0.0001)。与 AB 相比,DB 降低心率(-129/min;P<0.0001)和缩短分数(-21.6%;P<0.0001),并增加左心室收缩末期(+1.14mL;P=0.0004)和舒张末期容积(+1.93mL;P<0.0002)。接受 DB 治疗的猫在捐血后二尖瓣、主动脉瓣和肺动脉瓣的反流流量显著增加(P<0.05)。一只接受 DB 治疗的猫在捐血后左心室出现自发性回声对比。

结论和临床相关性

与 AB 相比,DB 在 IM 镇静和捐血后对猫的 ECHO 变量有更明显的影响。由于其对 ECHO 变量的影响最小,AB 可能是该猫群中更理想的镇静方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验