Suppr超能文献

美托洛尔新型控释制剂与传统缓释制剂的药代动力学和药效学比较。

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparison of a new controlled-release formulation of metoprolol with a traditional slow-release formulation.

作者信息

Oosterhuis B, Jonkman J H, Kerkhof F A

机构信息

Pharma Bio-Research Clinics B. V., Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, Assen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1988;33 Suppl:S15-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00578407.

Abstract

The plasma concentration-time profile and haemodynamic effects of metoprolol after the administration of metoprolol CR (a new multiple-unit controlled-release formulation) and metoprolol SR (a traditional slow-release formulation) once daily, were investigated in 12 healthy men. Data were collected over one 24-h dose interval at steady state after five days of treatment. The study was a randomized, three-way, cross-over comparison of metoprolol CR, 100 mg, metoprolol SR, 100 mg, and placebo. The reduction in exercise heart rate in relation to placebo treatment was used as a measure of beta 1-blockade. The metoprolol plasma concentration-time profile during treatment with metoprolol CR was smooth and uniform, showing a more controlled release profile than that obtained with metoprolol SR. This was demonstrated by the significantly longer time period during which the plasma concentration exceeded 75% of the maximum concentration (T75), for metoprolol CR compared with metoprolol SR (p less than 0.05). The percentage peak-trough fluctuation in plasma metoprolol concentration was significantly smaller for metoprolol CR than for metoprolol SR (p less than 0.001). These pharmacokinetic differences between metoprolol CR and metoprolol SR produced a different duration of clinically relevant beta 1-blockade, defined as a reduction in exercise heart rate of greater than 10%. By this definition metoprolol CR was still effective in seven subjects and metoprolol SR in two subjects 24 h after dosing. The percentage peak-trough fluctuation in exercise heart rate over the dose interval was significantly smaller for metoprolol CR than for metoprolol SR (p less than 0.001), thus demonstrating a more even beta 1-blockade with metoprolol CR.

摘要

在12名健康男性中研究了每日一次服用美托洛尔控释片(一种新型多单元控释制剂)和美托洛尔缓释片(一种传统缓释制剂)后美托洛尔的血浆浓度-时间曲线及血流动力学效应。在治疗五天后的稳态下,于一个24小时给药间隔内收集数据。该研究为美托洛尔控释片100毫克、美托洛尔缓释片100毫克和安慰剂的随机、三向交叉比较。将与安慰剂治疗相比运动心率的降低用作β1受体阻滞的衡量指标。美托洛尔控释片治疗期间美托洛尔的血浆浓度-时间曲线平滑且均匀,显示出比美托洛尔缓释片更可控的释放曲线。这通过与美托洛尔缓释片相比,美托洛尔控释片血浆浓度超过最大浓度75%的时间段显著更长得以证明(T75,p小于0.05)。美托洛尔控释片血浆美托洛尔浓度的峰谷波动百分比显著小于美托洛尔缓释片(p小于0.001)。美托洛尔控释片和美托洛尔缓释片之间的这些药代动力学差异产生了不同持续时间的临床相关β1受体阻滞,定义为运动心率降低大于10%。根据此定义,给药24小时后,美托洛尔控释片在7名受试者中仍有效,美托洛尔缓释片在2名受试者中仍有效。美托洛尔控释片在给药间隔内运动心率的峰谷波动百分比显著小于美托洛尔缓释片(p小于0.001),从而表明美托洛尔控释片的β1受体阻滞更均匀。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验