Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni - 15, Bologna, Italia.
Oncology Unit, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy.
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Mar;8(2):514-521. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.03.001. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have reported unprecedented results in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients, as monotherapy or in combination with other anticancer agents. However, little information is available regarding the association between different clinicopathological features and survival in this setting.
We performed a meta-analysis aimed at exploring the predictive value of routinely collected clinicopathological data in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating ICIs plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in treatment-naïve patients with mRCC.
We retrieved all the relevant RCTs through PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE; additionally, proceedings of the main international oncological meetings were also searched for relevant abstracts. Eligible studies included RCTs assessing first-line ICI-TKI versus sunitinib in treatment-naïve mRCC patients; the primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), measured as hazard ratio (HR) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI).
Overall, three phase III RCTs involving 1769 patients with advanced or metastatic RCC were included. Compared with sunitinib, the ICI-TKI combination significantly decreased the risk of death in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) 0 (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.57-0.76) and ECOG-PS 1 (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.54-0.77). Similarly, the combination was associated with prolonged OS in patients who were <65 yr old (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.49-0.67), in mRCC patients ≥65 yr old (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.90), as well as in male (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.56-0.78) and female (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52-0.83) patients.
According to our results, the magnitude of benefit of the ICI-TKI combination over sunitinib monotherapy in treatment-naïve mRCC patients was consistent across the clinicopathological subgroups. Despite the limitations affecting the analysis, we believe that the results of the current meta-analysis could assist clinicians and researchers in the design and interpretation of future clinical trials on combination therapies in this setting.
First-line combinations of an immune checkpoint inhibitor plus a tyrosine kinase inhibitor improved survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. This survival benefit was consistent across all subgroups of mRCC patients irrespective of clinicopathological features such as patient performance status, age <65 and ≥65 yr, and male and female gender.
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)在转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者的治疗中取得了前所未有的疗效,无论是单药治疗还是与其他抗癌药物联合治疗。然而,关于不同临床病理特征与该治疗环境下的生存之间的关系,目前信息有限。
我们进行了一项荟萃分析,旨在探讨在治疗初治 mRCC 患者中,常规收集的临床病理数据在随机对照试验(RCTs)评估 ICI 联合酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)中的预测价值。
我们通过 PubMed/Medline、Cochrane 图书馆和 EMBASE 检索了所有相关 RCTs;此外,还搜索了主要国际肿瘤学会议的会议记录,以获取相关摘要。纳入的研究包括评估一线 ICI-TKI 与舒尼替尼在治疗初治 mRCC 患者中的疗效的 RCTs;主要终点是总生存期(OS),以风险比(HR)及其相应的 95%置信区间(CI)表示。
共纳入了三项涉及 1769 例晚期或转移性 RCC 患者的 III 期 RCTs。与舒尼替尼相比,ICI-TKI 联合治疗显著降低了东部肿瘤协作组体力状态(ECOG-PS)0 (HR,0.66;95%CI,0.57-0.76)和 ECOG-PS 1 (HR,0.64;95%CI,0.54-0.77)患者的死亡风险。同样,该联合治疗在年龄<65 岁(HR,0.57;95%CI,0.49-0.67)、年龄≥65 岁(HR,0.75;95%CI,0.61-0.90)、男性(HR,0.66;95%CI,0.56-0.78)和女性(HR,0.66;95%CI,0.52-0.83)患者中均与 OS 延长相关。
根据我们的结果,ICI-TKI 联合治疗在治疗初治 mRCC 患者中的疗效优于舒尼替尼单药治疗,这种获益在所有临床病理亚组中是一致的。尽管分析受到一些限制,但我们相信当前荟萃分析的结果可以帮助临床医生和研究人员在该治疗环境下设计和解释联合治疗的未来临床试验。
一线免疫检查点抑制剂联合酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)可提高患者的生存率。这种生存获益在 mRCC 患者的所有亚组中是一致的,无论其临床病理特征如何,如患者的体能状态、年龄<65 岁和≥65 岁以及性别。