Suppr超能文献

虚拟三期能谱探测器 CT 腹部血管成像:初步临床经验。

Abdominal vessel depiction on virtual triphasic spectral detector CT: initial clinical experience.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Cologne, Kerpener Straße, 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.

Else Kröner Forschungskolleg Clonal Evolution in Cancer, University Hospital Cologne, Weyertal 115b, 50931, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Jul;46(7):3501-3511. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03001-2. Epub 2021 Mar 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate vessel assessment in virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) and virtual-non-contrast images (VNC) derived from venous phase spectral detector computed tomography (SDCT) acquisitions in comparison to arterial phase and true non-contrast (TNC) images.

METHODS

Triphasic abdominal SDCT was performed in 25 patients including TNC, arterial and venous phase. VMI and VNC were reconstructed from the venous phase and compared to conventional arterial-phase images (CI), TNC and conventional venous-phase images (CI). Vessel contrast and virtual contrast removal were analyzed with region-of-interest-based measurements and in a qualitative assessment.

RESULTS

Quantitative analysis revealed no significant attenuation differences between TNC and VNC in arterial vessels (p-range 0.07-0.47) except for the renal artery (p = 0.011). For venous vessels, significant differences between TNC and VNC were found for all veins (p < 0.001) except the inferior vena cava (p = 0.26), yet these differences remained within a 10 HU range in most patients. No significant attenuation differences were found between CI/VMI in arterial vessels (p-range 0.06-0.86). Contrast-to-noise ratio provided by VMI and CI was equivalent for all arterial vessels assessed (p-range 0.14-0.91). Qualitatively, VMI showed similar enhancement of abdominal and pelvic arteries as CI and VNC were rated comparable to TNC.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that VNC and VMI derived from single venous-phase SDCT offer comparable assessment of major abdominal vessels as provided by routine triphasic examinations, if no dynamic contrast information is required.

摘要

目的

评估源于静脉期能谱 CT (SDCT)采集的虚拟单能量图像(VMI)和虚拟非对比图像(VNC)与动脉期和真实非对比(TNC)图像的血管评估。

方法

对 25 例患者进行了三期腹部 SDCT 检查,包括 TNC、动脉期和静脉期。从静脉期重建 VMI 和 VNC,并与常规动脉期图像(CI)、TNC 和常规静脉期图像(CI)进行比较。采用基于感兴趣区域的测量和定性评估分析血管对比度和虚拟对比度去除。

结果

定量分析显示,动脉血管中 TNC 和 VNC 之间的衰减差异无统计学意义(p 范围 0.07-0.47),除了肾动脉(p=0.011)。对于静脉血管,TNC 和 VNC 之间存在显著差异,除了下腔静脉(p=0.26),但大多数患者的差异仍在 10 HU 范围内。CI/VMI 之间的动脉血管的衰减差异无统计学意义(p 范围 0.06-0.86)。VMI 和 CI 提供的对比噪声比对于所有评估的动脉血管都是等效的(p 范围 0.14-0.91)。定性分析显示,VMI 与 CI 一样能很好地增强腹部和盆腔动脉,而 VNC 与 TNC 一样得到了很好的评价。

结论

如果不需要动态对比信息,单静脉期 SDCT 衍生的 VNC 和 VMI 可提供与常规三相检查相当的主要腹部血管评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc11/8215039/90bf1fca3c1a/261_2021_3001_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验