• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别日常临床实践的限制:将工作域分析应用于急诊科护理。

Identifying Constraints on Everyday Clinical Practice: Applying Work Domain Analysis to Emergency Department Care.

机构信息

2080447788430860 Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

5333 University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2022 Feb;64(1):74-98. doi: 10.1177/0018720821995668. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1177/0018720821995668
PMID:33715488
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergency departments (EDs) are complex socio-technical work systems that require staff to manage patients in an environment of fluctuating resources and demands. To better understand the purpose, and pressures and constraints for designing new ED facilities, we developed an abstraction hierarchy model as part of a work domain analysis (WDA) from the cognitive work analysis (CWA) framework. The abstraction hierarchy provides a model of the structure of the ED, encompassing the core objects, processes, and functions relating to key values and the ED's overall purpose.

METHODS

Reviews of relevant national and state policy, guidelines, and protocol documents applicable to care delivery in the ED were used to construct a WDA. The model was validated through focus groups with ED clinicians and subsequently validated using a series of WDA prompts.

RESULTS

The model shows that the ED system exhibits extremely interconnected and complex features. Heavily connected functions introduce vulnerability into the system with function performance determined by resource availability and prioritization, leading to a trade-off between time and safety priorities.

CONCLUSIONS

While system processes (e.g., triage, fast-track) support care delivery in ED, this delivery manifests in complex ways due to the personal and disease characteristics of patients and the dynamic state of the ED system. The model identifies system constraints that create tension in care delivery processes (e.g., electronic data entry, computer availability) potentially compromising patient safety.

APPLICATION

The model identified aspects of the ED system that could be leveraged to improve ED performance through innovative ED system design.

摘要

背景

急诊科(ED)是复杂的社会技术工作系统,要求工作人员在资源和需求不断变化的环境中管理患者。为了更好地理解设计新的急诊科设施的目的、压力和限制,我们从认知工作分析(CWA)框架中开发了一个抽象层次模型作为工作域分析(WDA)的一部分。该抽象层次模型提供了急诊科结构的模型,包括与关键价值观和急诊科整体目的相关的核心对象、过程和功能。

方法

对适用于急诊科护理的相关国家和州政策、指南和协议文件进行审查,用于构建 WDA。通过与急诊科临床医生进行焦点小组讨论对模型进行验证,然后使用一系列 WDA 提示对其进行验证。

结果

该模型表明,ED 系统表现出极其互联和复杂的特征。功能之间的紧密连接会给系统带来脆弱性,功能性能取决于资源的可用性和优先级,从而导致时间和安全优先级之间的权衡。

结论

虽然系统流程(例如分诊、快速通道)支持急诊科的护理提供,但由于患者的个人和疾病特征以及 ED 系统的动态状态,这种提供方式表现出复杂的方式。该模型确定了系统约束,这些约束在护理提供过程中造成紧张(例如,电子数据输入、计算机可用性),可能会危及患者安全。

应用

该模型确定了急诊科系统的各个方面,可以通过创新的急诊科系统设计来提高急诊科的性能。

相似文献

1
Identifying Constraints on Everyday Clinical Practice: Applying Work Domain Analysis to Emergency Department Care.识别日常临床实践的限制:将工作域分析应用于急诊科护理。
Hum Factors. 2022 Feb;64(1):74-98. doi: 10.1177/0018720821995668. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
2
Eadem Sed Aliter. Validating an emergency department work domain analysis across three hospital configurations.异中有同。在三种医院配置下验证急诊科工作领域分析。
Appl Ergon. 2024 May;117:104240. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104240. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
3
The scope for adaptive capacity in emergency departments: modelling performance constraints using control task analysis and social organisational cooperation analysis.急诊科适应能力的范围:使用控制任务分析和社会组织合作分析对绩效约束进行建模。
Ergonomics. 2022 Mar;65(3):467-484. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2021.1992004. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
4
The impact of knowledge on attitudes of emergency department staff towards patients with substance related presentations: a quantitative systematic review protocol.知识对急诊科工作人员对待物质相关就诊患者态度的影响:一项定量系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):133-45. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2203.
5
Accounting for memes in sociotechnical systems: extending the abstraction hierarchy to consider cognitive objects.在社会技术系统中考虑模因:扩展抽象层次结构以考虑认知对象。
Ergonomics. 2019 Jul;62(7):849-863. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2019.1603403. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
6
When high pressure, system constraints, and a social justice mission collide: A socio-structural analysis of emergency department social work services.当高压、系统限制和社会正义使命碰撞时:急诊社会工作服务的社会结构分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Apr;178:104-114. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.014. Epub 2017 Feb 11.
7
Modeling Patient Treatment With Medical Records: An Abstraction Hierarchy to Understand User Competencies and Needs.利用医疗记录对患者治疗进行建模:用于理解用户能力和需求的抽象层次结构。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2017 Jul 28;4(3):e16. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.6857.
8
Emergency department clinical leads' experiences of implementing primary care services where GPs work in or alongside emergency departments in the UK: a qualitative study.英国将全科医生纳入或融入急诊科的模式下,急诊科临床负责人实施基层医疗服务的经验:一项定性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Aug 14;20(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00358-3.
9
Cost reduction strategies for emergency services: insurance role, practice changes and patients accountability.降低急诊服务成本的策略:保险的作用、实践的改变和患者的责任。
Health Care Anal. 2009 Mar;17(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s10728-008-0081-0. Epub 2008 Feb 28.
10
Efficiency achievements from a user-developed real-time modifiable clinical information system.用户开发的实时可修改临床信息系统的效率成果。
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Feb;65(2):133-42.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.05.032. Epub 2014 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of a Human Factors Systems Approach to Healthcare Control Centres for Managing Patient Flow: A Scoping Review.人因系统方法在医疗保健控制中心管理患者流量中的应用:范围综述。
J Med Syst. 2024 Jun 18;48(1):62. doi: 10.1007/s10916-024-02071-1.
2
Improving emergency department care for adults presenting with mental illness: a systematic review of strategies and their impact on outcomes, experience, and performance.改善急诊科对患有精神疾病的成年人的护理:对策略及其对结局、体验和绩效影响的系统评价
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 29;15:1368129. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1368129. eCollection 2024.
3
Strategies to improve care for older adults who present to the emergency department: a systematic review.
改善老年急诊患者护理的策略:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 8;24(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10576-1.
4
Medication Safety Gaps in English Pediatric Inpatient Units: An Exploration Using Work Domain Analysis.英文儿科住院部用药安全差距:采用工作域分析进行的探索。
J Patient Saf. 2024 Jan 1;20(1):7-15. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001174. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
5
Experience-based codesign approach to improve care in Australian emergency departments for complex consumer cohorts: the MyED project protocol, Stages 1.1-1.3.基于经验的协同设计方法改善澳大利亚急诊科对复杂患者群体的护理:MyED 项目方案,第 1.1-1.3 阶段。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 5;13(7):e072908. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072908.
6
Novice Doctors in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review.急诊科的新手医生:一项范围综述
Cureus. 2022 Jun 23;14(6):e26245. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26245. eCollection 2022 Jun.
7
Context and Complexity in Telemedicine Evaluation: Work Domain Analysis in a Surgical Setting.远程医疗评估中的背景与复杂性:外科环境中的工作领域分析
JMIR Perioper Med. 2021 Sep 16;4(2):e26580. doi: 10.2196/26580.