Department of Sport Sciences, Japan Institute of Sports Sciences, Tokyo, Japan.
Chronobiol Int. 2021 Jun;38(6):820-829. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2021.1897608. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
This study aimed to test in elite athletes the correlation between the chronotype determined by the reduced version of the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (rMEQ) and that determined by the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire (MCTQ). In total, 351 elite athletes filled out the rMEQ questionnaire, 59 athletes filled out the MCTQ questionnaire, and 39 athletes filled out both questionnaires. The rMEQ score and the corrected midpoint of sleep from the MCTQ correlated weakly (|r| = 0.360, < .05); however, some cases were mismatched. The MSFsc also weakly correlated with age (|r| = 0.374, < .05), while rMEQ did not. Our results may suggest that the choice of questionnaire to determine chronotype should depend on the purpose and the type of sport athlete.
本研究旨在测试简化版 Morningness-Eveningness 问卷(rMEQ)和慕尼黑时间型问卷(MCTQ)确定的时型在精英运动员中的相关性。总共有 351 名精英运动员填写了 rMEQ 问卷,59 名运动员填写了 MCTQ 问卷,39 名运动员填写了这两份问卷。rMEQ 得分和 MCTQ 中校正的睡眠中点之间相关性较弱(|r|=0.360,<0.05);然而,有些情况并不匹配。MSFsc 也与年龄呈弱相关(|r|=0.374,<0.05),而 rMEQ 则没有。我们的结果可能表明,选择用于确定时型的问卷应取决于目的和运动员的运动类型。