Wild Cervantée E K, Cave Tami L, Willing Esther J, Derraik José G B, Grant Cameron C, Hofman Paul L, Anderson Yvonne C
Department of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Tamariki Pakari Child Health and Wellbeing Trust, New Plymouth, New Zealand.
BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 15;21(1):501. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10486-5.
In a recent issue of the BMC Public Health journal, Littlewood et al. described the results of a systematic review of interventions to prevent or treat childhood obesity in Māori or Pacific Island peoples. They found that studies to date have had limited impact on improving health outcomes for Māori and Pacific Island peoples, and suggest this may be due to a lack of co-design principles in the conception of the various studies. Ensuring that interventions are appropriate for groups most affected by obesity is critical; however, some inaccuracies should be noted in the explanation of these findings. There is a risk with systematic reviews that the context of intervention trials is lost without acknowledging the associated body of literature for programmes that refer to the ongoing commitment to communities and groups most affected by obesity.
在最近一期的《BMC公共卫生》杂志上,利特尔伍德等人描述了一项对预防或治疗毛利人或太平洋岛民儿童肥胖症的干预措施进行系统评价的结果。他们发现,迄今为止的研究对改善毛利人和太平洋岛民的健康结果影响有限,并指出这可能是由于各项研究在构思时缺乏共同设计原则。确保干预措施适合受肥胖影响最严重的群体至关重要;然而,在对这些发现的解释中应注意一些不准确之处。系统评价存在一种风险,即如果不承认涉及对受肥胖影响最严重的社区和群体持续承诺的相关文献体系,干预试验的背景就会丢失。