Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2021;31(1):77-99. doi: 10.1353/ken.2021.0005.
What just societies owe to non-citizen immigrants is a controversial question. This paper considers three accounts of the requirements of distributive justice for non-citizens to determine what they might suggest about the provision of publicly funded health care to pregnant undocumented immigrants. These accounts are compared to locate an overlapping consensus on the duty of the state to provide care to pregnant undocumented immigrants. The aim of this paper is not to take a substantive position on the "right" prenatal policy, but rather to explore the moral space that this issue occupies and suggest that real moral progress can be achieved through the consistent application of shared values.
什么样的社会应该给予非公民移民什么样的待遇是一个有争议的问题。本文考虑了分配正义对非公民的三种要求，以确定它们对向无证移民孕妇提供公共资金医疗保健的建议。将这些观点进行比较，以确定国家有向无证移民孕妇提供医疗服务的义务的重叠共识。本文的目的不是对“正确”的产前政策采取实质性立场，而是要探讨这个问题所占据的道德空间，并提出通过一致应用共同价值观可以实现真正的道德进步。
