• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

准备状态或障碍:与一年级末的成绩相比,幼儿园中学习阅读的儿童与阅读困难儿童在认知和语言方面的差异。

Readiness or Impairment: Cognitive and Linguistic Differences Between Children Who Learn to Read and Those Who Exhibit Difficulties With Reading in Kindergarten Compared to Their Achievements at the End of First Grade.

作者信息

Ne'eman Ariel, Shaul Shelley

机构信息

Edmond J. Safra Brain Research Center for the Studies of Learning Disabilities, Department of Learning Disabilities, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 25;12:614996. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.614996. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.614996
PMID:33716879
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7947890/
Abstract

Many studies have attempted to identify measures that predict reading abilities. The results of these studies may be inclined to over-identification of children considered at risk in kindergarten but who achieve parity in reading by the end of first grade. Therefore, the current study sought to analyze the specific cognitive and linguistic predictors of reading accuracy and reading speed separately. Additionally, the study examined if it is possible to use empirically validated measures to distinguish between children who are not ready to learn how to read in kindergarten but manage to acquire reading skills by the end of first grade, and those who continue to exhibit difficulties. The study followed 98 kindergarteners (43 boys and 55 girls) aged 4 years 10 months to six years from three different schools, who were taught how to read in kindergarten. Multiple measures of general cognitive skills, linguistic abilities, and reading abilities were measured at three different points in time: the beginning of kindergarten, the end of kindergarten, and the end of first grade. The study found that most of the children with good literacy and cognitive abilities learned how to read by the end of kindergarten. The analysis revealed a significant difference in cognitive abilities, such as executive functions and memory, which distinguished between the ability to acquire fluent reading and accurate reading. The study was able to successfully distinguish between "children with difficulties" and "un-ready" children. These results have various implications, especially in regard to the identification of and intervention with kindergarten children at risk for reading disabilities.

摘要

许多研究试图确定能够预测阅读能力的指标。这些研究的结果可能倾向于过度识别那些在幼儿园被认为有风险但在一年级结束时阅读能力达到同等水平的儿童。因此,当前的研究旨在分别分析阅读准确性和阅读速度的具体认知和语言预测因素。此外,该研究还考察了是否有可能使用经过实证验证的指标来区分那些在幼儿园时尚未准备好学习阅读但在一年级结束时成功掌握阅读技能的儿童,以及那些仍然存在阅读困难的儿童。该研究跟踪了来自三所不同学校的98名4岁10个月至6岁的幼儿园儿童(43名男孩和55名女孩),他们在幼儿园接受了阅读教学。在三个不同的时间点对一般认知技能、语言能力和阅读能力进行了多项测量:幼儿园开始时、幼儿园结束时和一年级结束时。研究发现,大多数具备良好读写能力和认知能力的儿童在幼儿园结束时学会了阅读。分析揭示了认知能力(如执行功能和记忆力)的显著差异,这些差异区分了获得流畅阅读和准确阅读的能力。该研究成功地区分了“有阅读困难的儿童”和“未准备好的儿童”。这些结果具有多方面的意义,尤其是在识别和干预有阅读障碍风险的幼儿园儿童方面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f90/7947890/1dbbc5cb5863/fpsyg-12-614996-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f90/7947890/dcbe36357573/fpsyg-12-614996-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f90/7947890/9b4c0fa95f65/fpsyg-12-614996-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f90/7947890/9ae3cfd02b6a/fpsyg-12-614996-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f90/7947890/3e9c0e9842a6/fpsyg-12-614996-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f90/7947890/e7c934ee5e46/fpsyg-12-614996-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f90/7947890/1dbbc5cb5863/fpsyg-12-614996-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f90/7947890/dcbe36357573/fpsyg-12-614996-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f90/7947890/9b4c0fa95f65/fpsyg-12-614996-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f90/7947890/9ae3cfd02b6a/fpsyg-12-614996-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f90/7947890/3e9c0e9842a6/fpsyg-12-614996-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f90/7947890/e7c934ee5e46/fpsyg-12-614996-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f90/7947890/1dbbc5cb5863/fpsyg-12-614996-g0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Readiness or Impairment: Cognitive and Linguistic Differences Between Children Who Learn to Read and Those Who Exhibit Difficulties With Reading in Kindergarten Compared to Their Achievements at the End of First Grade.准备状态或障碍:与一年级末的成绩相比,幼儿园中学习阅读的儿童与阅读困难儿童在认知和语言方面的差异。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 25;12:614996. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.614996. eCollection 2021.
2
The development of working memory from kindergarten to first grade in children with different decoding skills.不同解码技能儿童从幼儿园到一年级工作记忆的发展。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Feb;114(2):217-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.09.004. Epub 2012 Oct 13.
3
Learning disabilities.学习障碍
Future Child. 1996 Spring;6(1):54-76.
4
School readiness and later achievement: a French Canadian replication and extension.学校准备度与后期成就:一项加拿大法语区的复制与拓展研究。
Dev Psychol. 2010 Sep;46(5):984-94. doi: 10.1037/a0018881.
5
Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between children with and without reading disabilities: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first-grade interventions.作为区分有阅读障碍和无阅读障碍儿童手段的干预反应:幼儿园和一年级干预作用的证据
J Learn Disabil. 2006 Mar-Apr;39(2):157-69. doi: 10.1177/00222194060390020401.
6
Parental Teaching of Reading and Spelling Across the Transition From Kindergarten to Grade 1.从幼儿园到一年级过渡阶段家长对阅读和拼写的教导
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 8;11:610870. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.610870. eCollection 2020.
7
Predicting Children's Reading and Mathematics Achievement from Early Quantitative Knowledge and Domain-General Cognitive Abilities.从早期定量知识和一般领域认知能力预测儿童的阅读和数学成绩。
Front Psychol. 2016 May 25;7:775. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00775. eCollection 2016.
8
Estimating the Risk of Future Reading Difficulties in Kindergarten Children: A Research-Based Model and Its Clinical Implementation.评估幼儿园儿童未来阅读困难风险:基于研究的模型及其临床应用
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2001 Jan 1;32(1):38-50. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2001/004).
9
Predicting First Grade Reading Performance from Kindergarten Response to Tier 1 Instruction.从幼儿园对一级教学的反应预测一年级阅读表现。
Except Child. 2011 Summer;77(4):453-470. doi: 10.1177/001440291107700405.
10
Speech production deficits in early readers: predictors of risk.早期阅读者的言语产生缺陷:风险预测因素。
Read Writ. 2012 Apr;25(4):799-830. doi: 10.1007/s11145-011-9300-4. Epub 2011 Feb 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Early Identification of Reading Difficulties: A Screening Strategy that Adjusts the Sensitivity to the Level of Prediction Accuracy.阅读困难的早期识别:一种根据预测准确性水平调整敏感性的筛查策略。
Dyslexia. 2017 Aug;23(3):251-267. doi: 10.1002/dys.1560. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
2
Effects of Tier 3 Intervention for Students With Persistent Reading Difficulties and Characteristics of Inadequate Responders.针对持续存在阅读困难学生的三级干预效果及反应不足者的特征
J Educ Psychol. 2013 Aug;105(3):633-648. doi: 10.1037/a0032581.
3
The roles of family history of dyslexia, language, speech production and phonological processing in predicting literacy progress.
诵读困难家族史、语言、言语产生及语音加工在预测读写能力进展方面的作用。
Dev Sci. 2014 Sep;17(5):727-42. doi: 10.1111/desc.12153. Epub 2014 Mar 1.
4
Training phonological awareness: A study with inner-city kindergarten children.训练语音意识:一项针对市中心幼儿园儿童的研究。
Ann Dyslexia. 1994 Jan;44(1):26-59. doi: 10.1007/BF02648154.
5
Early identification of reading disabilities within an RTI framework.在回应干预(RTI)框架内对阅读障碍进行早期识别。
J Learn Disabil. 2015 May-Jun;48(3):281-97. doi: 10.1177/0022219413498115. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
6
Cognitive Correlates of Inadequate Response to Reading Intervention.阅读干预反应不足的认知关联
School Psych Rev. 2011;40(1):3-22.
7
The development of working memory from kindergarten to first grade in children with different decoding skills.不同解码技能儿童从幼儿园到一年级工作记忆的发展。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Feb;114(2):217-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.09.004. Epub 2012 Oct 13.
8
Common patterns of prediction of literacy development in different alphabetic orthographies.不同字母表文字系统中预测读写能力发展的常见模式。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Jun;23(6):678-86. doi: 10.1177/0956797611434536. Epub 2012 May 3.
9
Predicting reading comprehension of narrative and expository texts among Hebrew-speaking readers with and without a reading disability.预测有和没有阅读障碍的希伯来语读者对叙事和说明性文本的阅读理解能力。
Ann Dyslexia. 2011 Dec;61(2):242-68. doi: 10.1007/s11881-011-0059-8. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
10
Rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading fluency: implications for understanding and treatment of reading disabilities.快速命名自动化测验(RAN)和阅读流畅性:对阅读障碍理解和治疗的启示。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:427-52. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100431. Epub 2011 Aug 11.