• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从幼儿园对一级教学的反应预测一年级阅读表现。

Predicting First Grade Reading Performance from Kindergarten Response to Tier 1 Instruction.

作者信息

Al Otaiba Stephanie, Folsom Jessica S, Schatschneider Christopher, Wanzek Jeanne, Greulich Luana, Meadows Jane, Li Zhi, Connor Carol M

出版信息

Except Child. 2011 Summer;77(4):453-470. doi: 10.1177/001440291107700405.

DOI:10.1177/001440291107700405
PMID:21857718
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3156651/
Abstract

Many schools are beginning to implement multi-tier response to intervention (RTI) models for the prevention of reading difficulties and to assist in the identification of students with learning disabilities (LD). The present study was part of our larger ongoing longitudinal RTI investigation within the Florida Learning Disabilities Center grant. This study used a longitudinal correlational design, conducted in 7 ethnically and socio-economically diverse schools. We observed reading instruction in 20 classrooms, examined response rates to kindergarten Tier 1 instruction, and predicted students' first grade reading performance based upon kindergarten growth and end of year reading performance (n = 203). Teachers followed an explicit core reading program and overall, classroom instruction was rated as effective. Results indicate that controlling for students' end of kindergarten reading, their growth across kindergarten on a variety of language and literacy measures suppressed predictions of first grade performance. Specifically, the steeper the students' trajectory to a satisfactory outcome, the less likely they were to demonstrate good performance in first grade. Implications for future research and RTI implementation are discussed.

摘要

许多学校开始实施多层干预反应(RTI)模式,以预防阅读困难,并协助识别有学习障碍(LD)的学生。本研究是我们在佛罗里达学习障碍中心资助下正在进行的大型纵向RTI调查的一部分。本研究采用纵向相关设计,在7所种族和社会经济背景多样的学校进行。我们观察了20间教室的阅读教学,检查了对幼儿园一年级教学的反应率,并根据幼儿园的成长情况和年终阅读成绩预测了学生一年级的阅读表现(n = 203)。教师遵循明确的核心阅读计划,总体而言,课堂教学被评为有效。结果表明,在控制学生幼儿园期末阅读情况后,他们在幼儿园期间在各种语言和读写能力指标上的成长抑制了对一年级表现的预测。具体而言,学生达到满意结果的轨迹越陡峭,他们在一年级表现良好的可能性就越小。文中讨论了对未来研究和RTI实施的启示。

相似文献

1
Predicting First Grade Reading Performance from Kindergarten Response to Tier 1 Instruction.从幼儿园对一级教学的反应预测一年级阅读表现。
Except Child. 2011 Summer;77(4):453-470. doi: 10.1177/001440291107700405.
2
To Wait in Tier 1 or Intervene Immediately: A Randomized Experiment Examining First Grade Response to Intervention (RTI) in Reading.是等待一级干预还是立即介入:一项检验一年级阅读干预反应(RTI)的随机实验。
Except Child. 2014 Oct 1;81(1):11-27. doi: 10.1177/0014402914532234.
3
Assessment Data-Informed Guidance to Individualize Kindergarten Reading Instruction: Findings from a Cluster-Randomized Control Field Trial.基于评估数据的个性化幼儿园阅读教学指导:一项整群随机对照现场试验的结果
Elem Sch J. 2011 Jun;111(4):535-560. doi: 10.1086/659031.
4
Analyzing the role of fidelity of RTI Tier 2 reading intervention in Spanish kindergarten and first grade students.分析 RTI 二级阅读干预在西班牙幼儿园和一年级学生中的实施忠实度的作用。
Ann Dyslexia. 2021 Apr;71(1):28-49. doi: 10.1007/s11881-021-00221-5. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
5
Access to a responsiveness to intervention model: does beginning intervention in kindergarten matter?采用反应干预模型:在幼儿园开始干预重要吗?
J Learn Disabil. 2014 Jul-Aug;47(4):307-28. doi: 10.1177/0022219412459354. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
6
The Relationship of Print Reading in Tier I Instruction and Reading Achievement for Kindergarten Students At-Risk for Reading Difficulties.一年级教学中的印刷读物阅读与有阅读困难风险的幼儿园学生阅读成绩之间的关系。
Learn Disabil Q. 2014 Aug;37(3):148-160. doi: 10.1177/0731948713518334.
7
Differences in Growth Reading Patterns for at-Risk Spanish-Monolingual Children as a Function of a Tier 2 Intervention.高危西班牙语单语儿童的生长阅读模式差异,作为第 2 层干预的函数。
Span J Psychol. 2018 Mar 9;21:E4. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2018.3.
8
Exploring the Amount and Type of Writing Instruction during Language Arts Instruction in Kindergarten Classrooms.探索幼儿园课堂语言艺术教学中的写作指导量与类型。
Read Writ. 2014 Feb 1;27(2):213-236. doi: 10.1007/s11145-013-9441-8.
9
Shared Reading and Science Vocabulary for Kindergarten Students.幼儿园学生的共享阅读与科学词汇
Early Child Educ J. 2023;51(1):127-138. doi: 10.1007/s10643-021-01288-w. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
10
Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.小班教学对提高中小学学生成绩的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 11;14(1):1-107. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.10. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Student Behavior Ratings and Response to Tier 1 Reading Intervention: Which Students Do Not Benefit?学生行为评分与对一级阅读干预的反应:哪些学生未从中受益?
J Res Educ Eff. 2024;17(3):491-512. doi: 10.1080/19345747.2023.2194894. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
2
Development, Reliability, and Validity of the Preschool Learning Skills Scale: A Tool for Early Identification of Preschoolers at Risk of Learning Disorder in Mainland China.《学前学习技能量表的编制、信效度研究:中国大陆地区早期识别有学习障碍风险学龄前儿童的工具》
Front Neurol. 2022 Jul 13;13:918163. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.918163. eCollection 2022.
3
Latent Class Growth Trajectories of Letter Name Knowledge During Pre-Kindergarten and Kindergarten.学前班和幼儿园阶段字母名称知识的潜在类别增长轨迹
J Appl Dev Psychol. 2020 Jul-Aug;69. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2020.101141. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
4
Inhibition, Updating Working Memory, and Shifting Predict Reading Disability Symptoms in a Hybrid Model: Project KIDS.混合模型中抑制、更新工作记忆和转换对阅读障碍症状的预测:儿童项目
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 20;9:238. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00238. eCollection 2018.
5
Word Decoding Development during Phonics Instruction in Children at Risk for Dyslexia.诵读困难风险儿童在语音教学过程中的单词解码发展
Dyslexia. 2017 May;23(2):141-160. doi: 10.1002/dys.1556.
6
An Examination of Kindergarten Oral Language for African American Students: Are There Meaningful Differences in Comparison to Peers?对非裔美国学生幼儿园口语的考察:与同龄人相比是否存在显著差异?
Read Writ Q. 2016;32(5):477-498. doi: 10.1080/10573569.2015.1039737. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
7
To Wait in Tier 1 or Intervene Immediately: A Randomized Experiment Examining First Grade Response to Intervention (RTI) in Reading.是等待一级干预还是立即介入:一项检验一年级阅读干预反应(RTI)的随机实验。
Except Child. 2014 Oct 1;81(1):11-27. doi: 10.1177/0014402914532234.
8
Academic Responding During Instruction and Reading Outcomes for Kindergarten Students At-risk for Reading Difficulties.幼儿园有阅读困难风险学生在教学过程中的学业反应及阅读成果
Read Writ. 2014 Jan 1;27(1):55-78. doi: 10.1007/s11145-013-9433-8.
9
Early identification of reading disabilities within an RTI framework.在回应干预(RTI)框架内对阅读障碍进行早期识别。
J Learn Disabil. 2015 May-Jun;48(3):281-97. doi: 10.1177/0022219413498115. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
10
Amount of Time in Print Reading in General Education Kindergarten Classrooms: What Does It Look Like for Students At-risk for Reading Difficulties?普通教育幼儿园课堂上的印刷品阅读时间:阅读困难风险学生的情况如何?
Learn Disabil Res Pract. 2012 May 1;27(2):56-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2012.00351.x.

本文引用的文献

1
The importance of measuring growth in response to intervention models: Testing a core assumption.衡量针对干预模型的生长反应的重要性:检验一个核心假设。
Learn Individ Differ. 2008;18(3):308-315. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.04.005.
2
Individualizing student instruction precisely: effects of Child x Instruction interactions on first graders' literacy development.精准地实现学生教学的个性化:儿童与教学互动对一年级学生读写能力发展的影响。
Child Dev. 2009 Jan-Feb;80(1):77-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01247.x.
3
Who are the young children for whom best practices in reading are ineffective? An experimental and longitudinal study.对于哪些幼儿而言,最佳阅读方法是无效的?一项实验性纵向研究。
J Learn Disabil. 2006 Sep-Oct;39(5):414-31. doi: 10.1177/00222194060390050401.
4
Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between children with and without reading disabilities: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first-grade interventions.作为区分有阅读障碍和无阅读障碍儿童手段的干预反应:幼儿园和一年级干预作用的证据
J Learn Disabil. 2006 Mar-Apr;39(2):157-69. doi: 10.1177/00222194060390020401.
5
A longitudinal study of the development of oral reading fluency in young children at risk for reading failure.一项针对有阅读障碍风险的幼儿口语阅读流畅性发展的纵向研究。
J Learn Disabil. 2005 Sep-Oct;38(5):387-99. doi: 10.1177/00222194050380050201.
6
Predicting improvement after first-grade reading difficulties: the effects of oral language, emergent literacy, and behavior skills.预测一年级阅读困难后的进步:口语、早期读写能力和行为技能的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2005 Jan;41(1):225-34. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.1.225.
7
Beginning reading intervention as inoculation or insulin: first-grade reading performance of strong responders to kindergarten intervention.将阅读干预作为预防接种或胰岛素:对幼儿园干预有强烈反应者的一年级阅读表现
J Learn Disabil. 2004 Mar-Apr;37(2):90-104. doi: 10.1177/00222194040370020101.