• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健改革的必要性:无过错责任是医疗事故的解决方案吗?

The need for healthcare reforms: is no-fault liability the solution to medical malpractice?

作者信息

Rai Shivkrit, Devaiah Vishwas H

机构信息

Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat, Haryana India.

出版信息

Asian Bioeth Rev. 2019 Apr 4;11(1):81-93. doi: 10.1007/s41649-019-00081-7. eCollection 2019 Mar.

DOI:10.1007/s41649-019-00081-7
PMID:33717302
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7747425/
Abstract

Healthcare reforms in India have been a much-debated issue in the recent past. While the debate has focused mainly on the right to healthcare, another by-product that has evolved out of the debate was the current problem of medical malpractice and the healthcare law. The last decade has seen an increase in the healthcare facilities in the country. This, however, has come with a bulk of medical error cases which the courts have entertained. According to reports, there has been an increase in medical litigation cases by 400% in the last decade. There are about 5.2 million cases of medical error in the country every year. While there exists a standard legal system in the country which entertains such complaints of medical malpractice, the attempt by regulators and medical practitioners should be to reduce these cases. This paper seeks to analyze the extent to which medical malpractice cases affect consumers (patients). It analyzes the existing medical liability system which has mainly evolved through the jurisprudence laid down by the English courts and critiques it. It also looks into the major reasons for such medical mishaps. Authors argue that a "No-Fault" system may give better outcomes. They analyze this by looking at the no-fault liability model implemented in New Zealand. Narratives of no-fault liability being implemented in India have also been used. These are showcased from instances of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and Clinical Trial regulations. It is also argued that a by-product of a no-fault liability system is stringent regulations which are used to reduce the possibility of medical mishaps altogether. Lastly, the possible problems of the no-fault liability system are discussed in the paper.

摘要

印度的医疗改革在最近一直是一个备受争议的问题。虽然辩论主要集中在医疗保健权上,但这场辩论产生的另一个附带结果是当前的医疗事故问题和医疗保健法。在过去十年中,该国的医疗设施有所增加。然而,随之而来的是大量法院受理的医疗差错案件。据报道,在过去十年中,医疗诉讼案件增加了400%。该国每年约有520万起医疗差错案件。虽然该国存在受理此类医疗事故投诉的标准法律体系,但监管机构和医疗从业者的努力应该是减少这些案件。本文旨在分析医疗事故案件对消费者(患者)的影响程度。它分析了主要通过英国法院确立的判例法演变而来的现行医疗责任制度,并对其进行了批判。它还探讨了此类医疗事故的主要原因。作者认为“无过错”制度可能会产生更好的结果。他们通过研究新西兰实施的无过错责任模式来进行分析。文中还引用了印度实施无过错责任的案例。这些案例来自1988年《机动车法》和临床试验法规的实例。文中还指出,无过错责任制度的一个附带结果是严格的监管,这些监管旨在完全降低医疗事故发生的可能性。最后,本文讨论了无过错责任制度可能存在的问题。

相似文献

1
The need for healthcare reforms: is no-fault liability the solution to medical malpractice?医疗保健改革的必要性:无过错责任是医疗事故的解决方案吗?
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2019 Apr 4;11(1):81-93. doi: 10.1007/s41649-019-00081-7. eCollection 2019 Mar.
2
[Current issues in legal cases of compensation for healthcare malpractice].[医疗事故赔偿法律案件中的当前问题]
Orv Hetil. 2014 Sep 21;155(38):1510-6. doi: 10.1556/OH.2014.29970.
3
Evaluative reports on medical malpractice policies in obstetrics: a rapid scoping review.评估医疗事故政策在产科中的作用的报告:快速范围界定审查。
Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 6;6(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0569-5.
4
New Rules on Patient's Safety and Professional Liability for the Italian Health Service.意大利卫生服务患者安全和专业责任新规则。
Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2019;20(8):615-624. doi: 10.2174/1389201020666190408094016.
5
Improving the medical malpractice litigation process.改进医疗事故诉讼程序。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Jul-Aug;23(4):33-41. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.4.33.
6
The debate on no-fault compensation in the Netherlands.荷兰关于无过错赔偿的辩论。
Med Law. 2005 Dec;24(4):691-701.
7
Medical Liability: Review of a Whole Year of Judgments of the Civil Court of Rome.医疗责任:罗马民事法院全年判决综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 3;18(11):6019. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18116019.
8
Compensation for medical injury in New Zealand: does "'no-fault" increase the level of claims making and reduce social and clinical selectivity?新西兰的医疗伤害赔偿:“无过错”制度是否会增加索赔水平并减少社会和临床选择?
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2002 Oct;27(5):833-54. doi: 10.1215/03616878-27-5-833.
9
Medical malpractice reform measures and their effects.医疗事故改革措施及其效果。
Chest. 2013 Jul;144(1):306-318. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-2861.
10
A New Argument for No-Fault Compensation in Health Care: The Introduction of Artificial Intelligence Systems.医疗无过错赔偿的新论点:人工智能系统的引入。
Health Care Anal. 2021 Sep;29(3):171-188. doi: 10.1007/s10728-021-00430-4. Epub 2021 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding, being, and doing of bioethics; a state-level cross-sectional study of knowledge, attitude, and practice among healthcare professionals.生物伦理学的理解、存在和实践;一项针对医疗保健专业人员的知识、态度和实践的州级横断面研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Mar 18;25(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01028-w.
2
Re: The need for healthcare reforms: is no-fault liability the solution to medical malpractice?关于:医疗保健改革的必要性:无过错责任是医疗事故的解决方案吗?
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2019 Jun 14;11(2):147-151. doi: 10.1007/s41649-019-00090-6. eCollection 2019 Jun.
3
Biodiversity, Big Data and Genome Editing.生物多样性、大数据与基因组编辑。
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2019 Jun 19;11(2):129-132. doi: 10.1007/s41649-019-00091-5. eCollection 2019 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Does the Law on Compensation for Research-Related Injury in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand Meet Ethical Requirements?
Med Law Rev. 2017 Aug 1;25(3):397-427. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwx019.
2
Compensation for clinical trial-related injury and death in India: challenges and the way forward.印度临床试验相关损伤与死亡的补偿:挑战与未来之路
Drug Saf. 2014 Dec;37(12):995-1002. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0230-3.
3
Defensive medicine: a bane to healthcare.防御性医疗:医疗保健的一大祸害。
Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2013 Apr;3(2):295-6. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.113688.
4
India's regulatory reforms on compensation for clinical trial injuries and deaths: urgent need for revisiting.印度关于临床试验伤害与死亡赔偿的监管改革:亟需重新审视。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2013 Jul-Sep;10(3):195-7. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2013.057.
5
New Zealand's 2005 'no-fault' compensation reforms and medical professional accountability for harm.新西兰2005年的“无过错”赔偿改革与医疗专业人员对伤害的责任。
N Z Med J. 2013 Mar 15;126(1371):33-44.
6
Compensation conundrum.补偿难题。
Perspect Clin Res. 2012 Jan;3(1):4-7. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.92300.
7
Medical negligence: Coverage of the profession, duties, ethics, case law, and enlightened defense - A legal perspective.医疗过失:从法律角度看该职业的涵盖范围、职责、伦理、判例法及明智抗辩
Indian J Urol. 2009 Jul;25(3):372-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.56206.
8
The role of clinical guidelines in medical negligence litigation: has India made the shift?临床指南在医疗过失诉讼中的作用:印度是否已做出转变?
Indian J Med Ethics. 2009 Jul-Sep;6(3):158-9. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2009.051.
9
An introduction to medical malpractice in the United States.美国医疗事故简介。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Feb;467(2):339-47. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0636-2. Epub 2008 Nov 26.
10
No-fault compensation in New Zealand: harmonizing injury compensation, provider accountability, and patient safety.新西兰的无过错赔偿:协调伤害赔偿、提供者问责制和患者安全。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Jan-Feb;25(1):278-83. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.1.278.