Xafis Vicki, Labude Markus K
Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2019 Oct 1;11(3):255-273. doi: 10.1007/s41649-019-00097-z. eCollection 2019 Sep.
There is a growing expectation, or even requirement, for researchers to deposit a variety of research data in data repositories as a condition of funding or publication. This expectation recognizes the enormous benefits of data collected and created for research purposes being made available for secondary uses, as open science gains increasing support. This is particularly so in the context of big data, especially where health data is involved. There are, however, also challenges relating to the collection, storage, and re-use of research data. This paper gives a brief overview of the landscape of data sharing via data repositories and discusses some of the key ethical issues raised by the sharing of health-related research data, including expectations of privacy and confidentiality, the transparency of repository governance structures, access restrictions, as well as data ownership and the fair attribution of credit. To consider these issues and the values that are pertinent, the paper applies the deliberative balancing approach articulated in the (Xafis et al. 2019) to the domain of Openness in Big Data and Data Repositories. Please refer to that article for more information on how this framework is to be used, including a full explanation of the key values involved and the balancing approach used in the case study at the end.
人们越来越期望甚至要求研究人员将各种研究数据存入数据存储库,作为获得资助或发表论文的条件。随着开放科学获得越来越多的支持,这种期望认识到为研究目的而收集和创建的数据用于二次使用所带来的巨大好处。在大数据背景下尤其如此,特别是涉及健康数据时。然而,研究数据的收集、存储和再利用也存在挑战。本文简要概述了通过数据存储库进行数据共享的情况,并讨论了与健康相关研究数据共享所引发的一些关键伦理问题,包括对隐私和保密的期望、存储库治理结构的透明度、访问限制以及数据所有权和荣誉的公平归属。为了考虑这些问题以及相关的价值观,本文将(Xafis等人,2019年)阐述的审议平衡方法应用于大数据和数据存储库的开放性领域。有关如何使用此框架的更多信息,请参考该文章,包括对所涉及的关键价值观的完整解释以及案例研究末尾使用的平衡方法。