Suppr超能文献

从全球分层性别选择的构成中审视印度和中国

Figuring India and China in the Constitution of Globally Stratified Sex Selection.

作者信息

Bhatia Rajani

机构信息

Department of Women's, Gender & Sexuality Studies, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY USA.

出版信息

Asian Bioeth Rev. 2021 Jan 15;13(1):23-37. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00160-0. eCollection 2021 Mar.

Abstract

The advent of techniques of sex selection that rely on assisted reproduction led to a questioning of whether sex selection should be deemed always and everywhere unethical. While China and India are normally associated with condemned practices, they are also implicated in processes that constitute globally stratified sex selection inclusive of its more valued form, often referred to as family balancing. Through an application of Ong and Collier's concept of global assemblage, I demonstrate how family balancing, which has taken on a "global form," is tied to an "assemblage" of factors related to the anti-natal, population control contexts that have been pervasive in Asia. Three simultaneously occurring processes since the mid-1990s constituted stratified sex selection: the surfacing of China and India as figurative counter examples in deliberations of ethics on new techniques; active (inter)national surveillance of sex ratios as well as denunciation and criminalization of sex selective abortion in China and India; and the role of China and India in neoliberalizing population control and developing globalized markets in reproduction. Accounting for globally stratified sex selection requires a more robust interpretation of ethics that rethinks disciplinary approaches just as much as relativist ones in which respect for individual autonomy tends to overtake all other concerns.

摘要

依赖辅助生殖技术的性别选择技术的出现,引发了人们对于性别选择是否在任何时候、任何地点都应被视为不道德行为的质疑。虽然中国和印度通常与应受谴责的行为联系在一起,但它们也卷入了构成全球分层性别选择的过程,包括其更受重视的形式,通常被称为家庭平衡。通过应用翁和科利尔的全球组合概念,我展示了已呈现出“全球形式”的家庭平衡,是如何与亚洲普遍存在的与反生育、人口控制背景相关的一系列因素“组合”在一起的。自20世纪90年代中期以来,三个同时发生的过程构成了分层性别选择:中国和印度在关于新技术伦理的讨论中作为具有代表性的反例出现;对性别比例进行积极的(跨)国家监测,以及在中国和印度对性别选择性堕胎进行谴责并将其定为犯罪;中国和印度在使人口控制新自由主义化以及发展全球化生殖市场方面所起的作用。要对全球分层性别选择作出解释,需要对伦理进行更有力的阐释,这种阐释既要重新思考学科方法,也要重新思考相对主义方法,在相对主义方法中,对个人自主权的尊重往往凌驾于所有其他问题之上。

相似文献

1
Figuring India and China in the Constitution of Globally Stratified Sex Selection.从全球分层性别选择的构成中审视印度和中国
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2021 Jan 15;13(1):23-37. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00160-0. eCollection 2021 Mar.
6
The missing millions.
People Planet. 1998;7(3):10-1.
8
Abnormal sex ratios in human populations: causes and consequences.人类群体中的异常性别比例:原因与后果
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Sep 5;103(36):13271-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602203103. Epub 2006 Aug 28.
9
Sex-selective abortion: a relational approach.
Hypatia. 1995 Winter;10(1):202-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.1995.tb01360.x.
10
India bans female feticide.印度禁止堕女胎。
BMJ. 1994 Aug 13;309(6952):428. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6952.428.

引用本文的文献

1
Social Sciences, Bioethics, and the Question of Population.社会科学、生物伦理学与人口问题
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2021 Jan 15;13(1):1-5. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00162-y. eCollection 2021 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of reproductive technology for sex selection for nonmedical reasons.非医学原因的性别选择的生殖技术应用。
Fertil Steril. 2015 Jun;103(6):1418-22. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.035. Epub 2015 May 5.
6
Sex selection: treating different cases differently.性别选择:区别对待不同情况。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Aug;90(2):171-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.05.001.
8
Preconception gender selection for nonmedical reasons.
Fertil Steril. 2001 May;75(5):861-4. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)01756-3.
10
Ethical issues in gender selection by X/Y sperm separation.
Hum Reprod. 1993 Oct;8(10):1541. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137885.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验