Social Sciences, Bioethics, and the Question of Population.
作者信息
Majumdar Anindita, Mishra Paro, Kaur Ravinder
机构信息
Department of Liberal Arts, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Kandi, India.
Department of Social Sciences and Humanities, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India.
出版信息
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2021 Jan 15;13(1):1-5. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00162-y. eCollection 2021 Mar.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Social Sciences, Bioethics, and the Question of Population.社会科学、生物伦理学与人口问题
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2021 Jan 15;13(1):1-5. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00162-y. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Beyond integrating social sciences: Reflecting on the place of life sciences in empirical bioethics methodologies.超越整合社会科学：反思生命科学在实证生物伦理学方法中的地位。
Med Health Care Philos. 2018 Jun;21(2):207-214. doi: 10.1007/s11019-017-9792-z.
3
[Bioethics and transdisciplinarity as bridges for dialogue between health sciences and social and/or human sciences in the context of the ethics evaluation of research].[在研究伦理评估背景下，生物伦理学与跨学科性作为健康科学与社会科学和/或人文科学之间对话的桥梁]
Salud Colect. 2022 Aug 9;18:e4177. doi: 10.18294/sc.2022.4177.
4
[Scientific evidence and discourse bioethics].[科学证据与话语生物伦理学]
Cuad Bioet. 2009 Sep-Dec;20(70):453-69.
5
Towards disability ethics: a social science perspective.走向残疾伦理学：一种社会科学视角。
N Z Bioeth J. 2003 Jun;4(2):7-14.
6
Bioethics and Christian theology in Brazil.巴西的生物伦理学与基督教神学。
J Int Bioethique. 2008 Mar-Jun;19(1-2):43-53, 194-5. doi: 10.3917/jib.191.0043.
7
What can the social sciences contribute to the study of ethics? Theoretical, empirical and substantive considerations.社会科学能为伦理学研究做出哪些贡献？理论、实证和实质性考量。
Bioethics. 2002 Apr;16(2):89-113. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00273.
8
Is it time for bioethics to go empirical?生物伦理学是时候走向实证化了吗？
Bioethics. 2008 Mar;22(3):137-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00621.x.
9
Moving beyond bioethics: history and the search for medical humanism.超越生物伦理学：历史与对医学人文主义的探寻
Perspect Biol Med. 2004 Summer;47(3):372-85. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2004.0043.
10
The "Fourth Musketeer". Bioethics: Within life sciences - or above? A choice to make now.“第四把火枪手”。生命伦理学：在生命科学之内——还是在其之上？现在需要做出选择。
Acta Biochim Pol. 2021 Aug 31;68(3):477-479. doi: 10.18388/abp.2020_5778.
本文引用的文献
1
The Gendered Biopolitics of Sex Selection in India.印度性别选择的生物政治
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2021 Jan 4;13(1):111-127. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00159-7. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Reproductive Technologies, Care Crisis and Inter-generational Relations in North India: Towards a Local Ethics of Care.印度北部的生殖技术、护理危机与代际关系：迈向本土化护理伦理
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2021 Jan 7;13(1):91-109. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00158-8. eCollection 2021 Mar.
3
Marriage, Health, and Old-Age Support: Risk to Rural Involuntary Bachelors' Family Development in Contemporary China.婚姻、健康与养老支持：当代中国农村非自愿单身汉家庭发展面临的风险
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2021 Jan 12;13(1):77-89. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00163-x. eCollection 2021 Mar.
4
'You are not Young Anymore!': Gender, Age and the Politics of Reproduction in Post-reform China.“你不再年轻了！”：性别、年龄与改革后中国的生育政治
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2021 Jan 11;13(1):57-76. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00157-9. eCollection 2021 Mar.
5
Ageing and Reproductive Decline in Assisted Reproductive Technologies in India: Mapping the 'Management' of Eggs and Wombs.印度辅助生殖技术中的衰老与生殖能力下降：探寻卵子与子宫的“管理”情况
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2021 Jan 13;13(1):39-55. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00161-z. eCollection 2021 Mar.
6
Figuring India and China in the Constitution of Globally Stratified Sex Selection.从全球分层性别选择的构成中审视印度和中国
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2021 Jan 15;13(1):23-37. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00160-0. eCollection 2021 Mar.
7
Changing Fertility Landscapes: Exploring the Reproductive Routes and Choices of Fertility Patients from China for Assisted Reproduction in Russia.不断变化的生育图景：探索中国生育患者前往俄罗斯进行辅助生殖的生殖途径与选择
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2021 Jan 11;13(1):7-22. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00156-w. eCollection 2021 Mar.
8
Numbering others: Religious demography, identity, and fertility management experiences in contemporary India.为他人编号：当代印度的宗教人口统计学、身份认同和生育管理经验。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jun;254:112534. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112534. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
9
Seizing the Means of Reproduction: Entanglements of Feminism, Health, and Technoscience, by Michelle Murphy.《掌控生殖手段：女性主义、健康与技术科学的纠葛》，作者米歇尔·墨菲
Anthropol Med. 2016 Apr;23(1):126-128. doi: 10.1080/13648470.2015.1126081. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
10
Planning an Indian modernity: the gendered politics of fertility control.规划印度的现代性：生育控制的性别政治
Signs (Chic). 2001;26(3):811-45. doi: 10.1086/495629.
Zotero 插件