Suppr超能文献

环介导等温扩增法与QIAGEN PCR试剂盒检测非小细胞肺癌中表皮生长因子受体突变的对比研究

Comparative study of the loop-mediated isothermal amplification method and the QIAGEN PCR kit for the detection of EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer.

作者信息

Saito Yuichi, Takahashi Nobumasa, Matsui Atsuka, Michiyuki Satoru, Yamauchi Yoshikane, Shimizu Yoshihiko, Hoshi Eishin, Sakao Yukinori, Kawamura Masafumi

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Saitama Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Saitama, Japan.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2021 Feb;13(2):743-753. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-2642.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor receptor () mutations are important biomarkers in the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic diseases. The EGFR Rotor-Gene Q (RGQ) PCR Kit (Qiagen, Inc.) is an approved diagnostic test for EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aims to investigate the diagnostic capability of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay as an accurate, efficient, and cost-effective alternative to the assay.

METHODS

EGFR mutations were investigated by LAMP and assays using tissue samples that were surgically resected or biopsied from 117 consecutive patients with NSCLC tumors. The EGFR status from the LAMP assay was compared with that of the . Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed to confirm EGFR status of tumors that did not match in both assays. To establish an optimal LAMP AUC value, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed within tumors with exon 19 deletion or L858R point mutation.

RESULTS

Of the 117 tumors assayed, 45 tumors with mutations and 68 tumors with wild type were matched in both assays, four tumors having mismatched EGFR statuses. NGS further confirmed that two of the four discordant tumors had the same EGFR status that was determined by the LAMP assay. The AUC values were 0.973 (95% CI: 0.929-1.00) in exon 19 deletion, and 0.952 (95% CI: 0.885-1.00) in L858R point mutation. In exon 19 deletion, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 89.3%, 98.9%, and 96.6%, respectively, and 94.7%, 95.9%, and 95.7%, respectively, in L858R using AUC value of 0.222.

CONCLUSIONS

The LAMP assay compared favorably with the assay and has potential as an effective, simple, rapid, and low-cost diagnostic alternative. Based on these results, a liquid biopsy LAMP system should be developed for point-of-care testing of oncogenes in the near future.

摘要

背景

表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变是晚期或转移性疾病患者治疗中的重要生物标志物。EGFR Rotor-Gene Q(RGQ)PCR试剂盒(Qiagen公司)是一种经批准用于检测非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中EGFR突变的诊断测试。本研究旨在探讨环介导等温扩增(LAMP)检测法作为一种准确、高效且经济有效的替代检测方法的诊断能力。

方法

使用从117例连续的NSCLC肿瘤患者手术切除或活检获得的组织样本,通过LAMP和RGQ检测法研究EGFR突变情况。将LAMP检测法的EGFR状态与RGQ检测法的结果进行比较。对两种检测结果不一致的肿瘤进行下一代测序(NGS)以确认EGFR状态。为确定最佳LAMP曲线下面积(AUC)值,在存在外显子19缺失或L858R点突变的肿瘤中进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析。

结果

在检测的117个肿瘤中,45个有EGFR突变的肿瘤和68个EGFR野生型肿瘤在两种检测中结果一致,4个肿瘤的EGFR状态不匹配。NGS进一步证实,4个结果不一致的肿瘤中有2个具有与LAMP检测法确定的相同EGFR状态。外显子19缺失时AUC值为0.973(95%可信区间:0.929 - 1.00),L858R点突变时AUC值为0.952(95%可信区间:0.885 - 1.00)。在外显子19缺失中,敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为89.3%、98.9%和96.6%,在L858R中使用AUC值0.222时分别为94.7%、95.9%和95.7%。

结论

LAMP检测法与RGQ检测法相比具有优势,有潜力成为一种有效、简单、快速且低成本的诊断替代方法。基于这些结果,应在不久的将来开发一种用于即时检测癌基因的液体活检LAMP系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82e1/7947485/4192ff05f515/jtd-13-02-743-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验