Lemaire Anthony, Chao Joshua, Salgueiro Lauren, Ikegami Hirohisa, Lee Leonard Y
Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical Center, New Brunswick, USA.
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Feb;13(2):1005-1010. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-2549.
The optimal cannulation site for repair of type A aortic dissection remains controversial. The concern for Malperfusion syndrome has initiated a national trend away from femoral cannulation to axillary artery and direct ascending aortic cannulation. The purpose of this study was to report a single center experience with femoral artery cannulation for the repair of a type A dissection.
A retrospective study was performed on 52 patients who underwent surgical repair for a type A dissection between January 1, 2012 and June 30, 2019 at a single institution. Of the 52 patients analyzed, 35 (67.3%) underwent femoral artery, 11 (21.2%) direct ascending aortic, and 6 (11%) axillary artery cannulation for arterial access. Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest was used in all the patients. Rates of postoperative complication and mortality were reported.
The mortality and bleeding rates for all the patients undergoing repair of the type A dissection repairs were 27% (14/52) and 19% (10/52), respectively. Cardiopulmonary bypass was established in 100% of the patients that had femoral arterial cannulation. There were no complications specifically related to femoral arterial cannulation nor the axillary or direct aortic approach. Specifically, there was no episodes of malperfusion syndrome, bleeding, or injury with femoral artery cannulation. Bleeding rates were higher in cases that proceeded with a femoral (13%) versus alternate (6%) approach however; neither of the bleeding was related to the cannulation site. None of the mortalities identified were directly attributable to the cannulation approach in each case.
Despite the recent shift away from femoral cannulation, the results of the study show that femoral artery cannulation is safe and produces excellent results for establishing cardiopulmonary bypass. The concerns for malperfusion syndrome related to femoral cannulation were not seen.
A型主动脉夹层修复的最佳插管部位仍存在争议。对灌注不良综合征的担忧引发了全国范围内从股动脉插管转向腋动脉和直接升主动脉插管的趋势。本研究的目的是报告单中心采用股动脉插管修复A型夹层的经验。
对2012年1月1日至2019年6月30日在单一机构接受A型夹层手术修复的52例患者进行回顾性研究。在分析的52例患者中,35例(67.3%)采用股动脉插管,11例(21.2%)采用直接升主动脉插管,6例(11%)采用腋动脉插管进行动脉通路建立。所有患者均采用深低温停循环。报告术后并发症发生率和死亡率。
所有接受A型夹层修复的患者的死亡率和出血率分别为27%(14/52)和19%(10/52)。100%接受股动脉插管的患者建立了体外循环。没有与股动脉插管、腋动脉或直接主动脉入路相关的特定并发症。具体而言,股动脉插管没有发生灌注不良综合征、出血或损伤事件。然而,采用股动脉(13%)与其他入路(6%)的病例出血率更高;但两种出血均与插管部位无关。在每个病例中,确定的死亡均与插管方法无直接关系。
尽管最近已从股动脉插管转向其他方式,但研究结果表明,股动脉插管是安全的,并且在建立体外循环方面产生了优异的结果。未发现与股动脉插管相关的灌注不良综合征问题。