Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Aug 3;62(3). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac165.
The goal of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of double arterial cannulation (DAC), axillary cannulation and femoral cannulation in patients undergoing frozen elephant trunk for type A aortic dissection.
Between 2015 and 2020, the study included 488 patients and was divided into 3 groups: 171 in the DAC group, 217 in the axillary group and 100 in the femoral group. Overall survival was the primary end point and clinical outcomes were analysed after inverse probability weighting.
A total of 43 patients died during the follow-up period. DAC group presented higher percentages of coeliac trunk, renal and iliac artery malperfusion, but early outcomes and overall survival did not differ among groups. Subgroup analyses suggested that in patients requiring cardiopulmonary bypass duration ≥180 min, DAC approach was associated with a tendency to improved overall survival compared with axillary [hazard ratio (HR): 0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.14-0.90, P = 0.029) and femoral cannulation (HR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.14-1.03, P = 0.058). Inverse probability weighting adjustment (axillary as reference: HR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.13-0.86, P = 0.022; femoral as reference: HR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.11-0.90, P = 0.030) and multivariable Cox proportional hazards model (covariates including age, gender, acute dissection, any organ malperfusion and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest) confirmed this result.
DAC approach was commonly used in patients with branch artery malperfusion and clinical outcomes did not differ compared with axillary and femoral cannulation. It provides a flexible and effective option with adequate perfusion for cases with various dissection-involved statuses and prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass duration.
本研究旨在比较在接受主动脉弓部象鼻手术的患者中,双重动脉插管(DAC)、腋动脉插管和股动脉插管的临床结局。
2015 年至 2020 年,研究纳入了 488 例患者,分为 3 组:DAC 组 171 例,腋动脉组 217 例,股动脉组 100 例。总生存率为主要终点,并采用逆概率加权法分析临床结局。
随访期间共有 43 例患者死亡。DAC 组腹腔干、肾动脉和髂动脉灌注不良的比例较高,但各组间早期结局和总生存率无差异。亚组分析表明,在体外循环时间≥180 分钟的患者中,与腋动脉(风险比[HR]:0.35,95%置信区间[CI]:0.14-0.90,P=0.029)和股动脉插管(HR:0.38,95%CI:0.14-1.03,P=0.058)相比,DAC 方法有改善总生存率的趋势。逆概率加权调整(腋动脉为参照:HR:0.34,95%CI:0.13-0.86,P=0.022;股动脉为参照:HR:0.33,95%CI:0.11-0.90,P=0.030)和多变量 Cox 比例风险模型(协变量包括年龄、性别、急性夹层、任何器官灌注不良和深低温停循环)证实了这一结果。
DAC 方法常用于分支动脉灌注不良的患者,与腋动脉和股动脉插管相比,临床结局无差异。对于各种夹层受累状态和体外循环时间延长的病例,它提供了一种灵活有效的灌注选择。