• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Implementing the Mindfulness-Based Interventions; Teaching Assessment Criteria (MBI:TAC) in Mindfulness-Based Teacher Training.在基于正念的教师培训中实施基于正念的干预措施;教学评估标准(MBI:TAC)
Glob Adv Health Med. 2021 Feb 24;10:2164956121998340. doi: 10.1177/2164956121998340. eCollection 2021.
2
Can We Agree What Skilled Mindfulness-Based Teaching Looks Like? Lessons From Studying the MBI:TAC.我们能就基于正念的专业教学是什么样达成共识吗?对正念减压疗法教师认证课程的研究所得经验教训。
Glob Adv Health Med. 2020 Oct 13;9:2164956120964733. doi: 10.1177/2164956120964733. eCollection 2020.
3
Using the Mindfulness-Based Interventions: Teaching Assessment Criteria (MBI:TAC) in Supervision.在督导中使用基于正念的干预措施:教学评估标准(MBI:TAC)
Glob Adv Health Med. 2021 Feb 5;10:2164956121989949. doi: 10.1177/2164956121989949. eCollection 2021.
4
A Validation Study of the Mindfulness-Based Interventions Teaching Assessment Criteria for Assessing Mindfulness-Based Intervention Teacher Skill: Inter-Rater Reliability and Predictive Validity.一项用于评估正念干预教师技能的基于正念干预教学评估标准的验证研究:评分者间信度和预测效度。
Glob Adv Integr Med Health. 2024 Sep 24;13:27536130241275962. doi: 10.1177/27536130241275962. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
Introducing the Mindfulness-Based Interventions: Teaching and Learning Companion (The TLC).介绍基于正念的干预措施:教学与学习指南(TLC)。
Glob Adv Health Med. 2021 Nov 11;10:21649561211056883. doi: 10.1177/21649561211056883. eCollection 2021.
6
Development and validation of the mindfulness-based interventions - teaching assessment criteria (MBI:TAC).正念干预教学评估标准(MBI:TAC)的制定与验证。
Assessment. 2013 Dec;20(6):681-8. doi: 10.1177/1073191113490790. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
7
Assessing Mindfulness-Based Teaching Competence: Good Practice Guidance.评估基于正念的教学能力:良好实践指南。
Glob Adv Health Med. 2020 Nov 9;9:2164956120973627. doi: 10.1177/2164956120973627. eCollection 2020.
8
The Mindfulness-Based Interventions: Teaching Assessment Criteria (MBI:TAC): reflections on implementation and development.正念干预措施:教学评估标准(MBI:TAC):实施与发展的反思。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Aug;28:6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
9
The Reliability of Rating via Audio-Recording Using the Mindfulness-Based Interventions: Teaching Assessment Criteria.基于正念干预的教学评估标准:通过音频记录进行评分的可靠性
Glob Adv Integr Med Health. 2023 May 17;12:27536130221149966. doi: 10.1177/27536130221149966. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
10
Mindfulness-Based Teaching Competency Assessment: Comparing Self-Assessment With Expert Evaluation in the Veterans Administration - Compassionate Awareness Learning Module Program.基于正念的教学能力评估:在退伍军人事务部——慈悲意识学习模块项目中比较自我评估与专家评估
Glob Adv Integr Med Health. 2023 Sep 7;12:27536130231197654. doi: 10.1177/27536130231197654. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Intervention Fidelity in Mindfulness-Based Research and Practice: Overview of the Special Collection and State of the Field.基于正念的研究与实践中的干预保真度:特刊概述及该领域现状
Glob Adv Integr Med Health. 2025 Jun 11;14:27536130251349453. doi: 10.1177/27536130251349453. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Mindfulness teacher training enhances interoceptive awareness and reduces emotional distress: a controlled study.正念教师培训可增强内感受觉知并减轻情绪困扰:一项对照研究。
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 25;16:1488204. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1488204. eCollection 2025.
3
Context sensitive mindfulness: lessons from graduates of a professional training in South Africa.情境敏感正念:来自南非专业培训毕业生的经验教训。
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2025 Feb 26;25(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12906-025-04775-4.
4
A Validation Study of the Mindfulness-Based Interventions Teaching Assessment Criteria for Assessing Mindfulness-Based Intervention Teacher Skill: Inter-Rater Reliability and Predictive Validity.一项用于评估正念干预教师技能的基于正念干预教学评估标准的验证研究:评分者间信度和预测效度。
Glob Adv Integr Med Health. 2024 Sep 24;13:27536130241275962. doi: 10.1177/27536130241275962. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Health Insurance Coverage: If, How, and When? An Integrated Knowledge Translation (iKT) Delphi Key Informant Analysis.基于正念减压疗法的医疗保险覆盖范围:是否覆盖、如何覆盖以及何时覆盖?一项综合知识转化(iKT)德尔菲关键信息人分析
Mindfulness (N Y). 2024;15(5):1220-1233. doi: 10.1007/s12671-024-02366-x. Epub 2024 May 17.
6
Investigating the protective effects of mindfulness-based attention training on mind wandering in applied settings.研究基于正念的注意力训练在实际应用场景中对走神的保护作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 28;14:1232598. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1232598. eCollection 2023.
7
Rural sixth-grade teachers' and students' perceptions of a mindfulness-based mental health curriculum.农村六年级师生对基于正念的心理健康课程的看法。
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 1;14:1277614. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1277614. eCollection 2023.
8
Mindfulness-Based Teaching Competency Assessment: Comparing Self-Assessment With Expert Evaluation in the Veterans Administration - Compassionate Awareness Learning Module Program.基于正念的教学能力评估:在退伍军人事务部——慈悲意识学习模块项目中比较自我评估与专家评估
Glob Adv Integr Med Health. 2023 Sep 7;12:27536130231197654. doi: 10.1177/27536130231197654. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
9
The Effects of a Mindfulness-Based Family Psychoeducation Intervention for the Caregivers of Young Adults with First-Episode Psychosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.基于正念的家庭心理教育干预对首发精神病青年患者照料者的影响:一项随机对照试验
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 5;20(2):1018. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021018.
10
Using the Mindfulness-Based Interventions: Teaching Assessment Criteria (MBI:TAC) in Supervision.在督导中使用基于正念的干预措施:教学评估标准(MBI:TAC)
Glob Adv Health Med. 2021 Feb 5;10:2164956121989949. doi: 10.1177/2164956121989949. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Using the Mindfulness-Based Interventions: Teaching Assessment Criteria (MBI:TAC) in Supervision.在督导中使用基于正念的干预措施:教学评估标准(MBI:TAC)
Glob Adv Health Med. 2021 Feb 5;10:2164956121989949. doi: 10.1177/2164956121989949. eCollection 2021.
2
Assessing Mindfulness-Based Teaching Competence: Good Practice Guidance.评估基于正念的教学能力:良好实践指南。
Glob Adv Health Med. 2020 Nov 9;9:2164956120973627. doi: 10.1177/2164956120973627. eCollection 2020.
3
Impact of Mindfulness-Based Teacher Training on MBSR Participant Well-Being Outcomes and Course Satisfaction.基于正念的教师培训对正念减压疗法参与者幸福感及课程满意度的影响。
Mindfulness (N Y). 2018;9(1):117-128. doi: 10.1007/s12671-017-0750-x. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
4
Prospects for a clinical science of mindfulness-based intervention.基于正念干预的临床科学前景。
Am Psychol. 2015 Oct;70(7):593-620. doi: 10.1037/a0039589.
5
Reenvisioning Clinical Science: Unifying the Discipline to Improve the Public Health.重新构想临床科学:统一学科以改善公众健康。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2014 Jan 1;2(1):22-34. doi: 10.1177/2167702613497932.
6
How do mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction improve mental health and wellbeing? A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediation studies.正念认知疗法和正念减压疗法如何改善心理健康和幸福感?基于中介研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Apr;37:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.01.006. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
7
Development and validation of the mindfulness-based interventions - teaching assessment criteria (MBI:TAC).正念干预教学评估标准(MBI:TAC)的制定与验证。
Assessment. 2013 Dec;20(6):681-8. doi: 10.1177/1073191113490790. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
8
Training Teachers to Deliver Mindfulness-Based Interventions: Learning from the UK Experience.培训教师开展基于正念的干预措施:借鉴英国经验。
Mindfulness (N Y). 2010 Jun;1(2):74-86. doi: 10.1007/s12671-010-0010-9. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
9
The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: A meta-analytic review.正念疗法对焦虑和抑郁的影响:一项荟萃分析综述。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Apr;78(2):169-83. doi: 10.1037/a0018555.
10
A conceptual and empirical review of the meaning, measurement, development, and teaching of intervention competence in clinical psychology.临床心理学中干预能力的意义、测量、发展及教学的概念性与实证性综述
Clin Psychol Rev. 2009 Feb;29(1):47-56. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.09.008. Epub 2008 Sep 30.

在基于正念的教师培训中实施基于正念的干预措施;教学评估标准(MBI:TAC)

Implementing the Mindfulness-Based Interventions; Teaching Assessment Criteria (MBI:TAC) in Mindfulness-Based Teacher Training.

作者信息

Griffith G M, Crane R S, Baer R, Fernandez E, Giommi F, Herbette G, Koerbel L

机构信息

Centre for Mindfulness Research and Practice, School of Psychology, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.

Oxford Mindfulness Centre, Oxford University, UK.

出版信息

Glob Adv Health Med. 2021 Feb 24;10:2164956121998340. doi: 10.1177/2164956121998340. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1177/2164956121998340
PMID:33717659
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7922609/
Abstract

The Mindfulness-Based Interventions: Teaching Assessment Criteria (MBI:TAC) was originally developed as a tool to assess the teaching competence of mindfulness-based program (MBP) teachers. The tool was made freely available and has since been used by mindfulness-based teacher training organisations internationally. During this time the MBI:TAC has evolved in its usage, from an assessment tool to one which informally supports how MBP teachers are trained. In this article, we first examine the rationale for implementing the MBI:TAC in MBP teacher training; second, we offer practical guidance on ways of integrating the tool into teacher training pathways with awareness of its potential and possible pitfalls; and third, we offer guidance on using the tool as a framework for giving effective feedback to trainees on their teaching practice. Implementing the MBI:TAC in teacher training may support the quality and integrity of MBP teacher training, and thus ensure high quality MBP teachers graduating. In turn this may help avoid the 'implementation cliff' - that is, the quality of an intervention delivery is delivered in optimal conditions when it is being researched, and drops in quality when delivered in sub-optimal, 'real world' conditions.

摘要

基于正念的干预教学评估标准(MBI:TAC)最初是作为一种评估基于正念的课程(MBP)教师教学能力的工具而开发的。该工具已免费提供,此后被国际上基于正念的教师培训机构使用。在此期间,MBI:TAC的用途不断演变,从一种评估工具发展成为一种非正式支持MBP教师培训方式的工具。在本文中,我们首先探讨在MBP教师培训中实施MBI:TAC的基本原理;其次,我们提供实用指导,介绍如何在意识到其潜力和可能存在的问题的情况下,将该工具整合到教师培训路径中;第三,我们提供指导,介绍如何将该工具用作框架,就学员的教学实践向他们提供有效反馈。在教师培训中实施MBI:TAC可能有助于提高MBP教师培训的质量和完整性,从而确保培养出高质量的MBP教师。反过来,这可能有助于避免“实施落差”——也就是说,一种干预措施在研究阶段以最佳条件实施时,其实施质量很高,但在次优的“现实世界”条件下实施时,质量会下降。