Suppr超能文献

全身麻醉与脊髓麻醉下腰椎手术的疗效、安全性及可靠性——64例病例分析

Efficacy, safety, and reliability of surgery on the lumbar spine under general versus spinal anesthesia- an analysis of 64 cases.

作者信息

Ahmed Jonayed Sharif, Alam Md Shah, Al Mamun Choudhury Abdullah, Akter Sohely, Chakraborty Shubhendu

机构信息

National Institute of Traumatology & Orthopaedic Rehabilitation, (NITOR), Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

出版信息

J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 Jan 8;16:176-181. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.12.032. eCollection 2021 May.

Abstract

QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN PURPOSE: Compare intra and postoperative parameters, surgeons' satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness between general anesthesia (GA) and spinal anesthesia (SA) on patients undergoing surgery in the lumbar spine surgery.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

Surgery on the lumbar spine is the commonest surgical procedure among all spinal surgical practices. Both the GA and SA are shown to be suitable techniques for performing the surgery safely. GA is used most frequently. But, SA became increasingly more popular because it allows the patient to self-position thereby reducing various complications associated with GA in a prone position.

METHODS

A total of 64 patients from June 2016 to July 2019 who underwent either discectomy, laminectomy, or lamino-foraminotomy for herniated lumbar disc or canal stenosis in 1 or 2 levels were included. During the study period, 32 patients were non-randomly selected for each of the GA and SA groups. The heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), blood loss, total anesthetic time, surgeons' satisfaction, analgesic requirements, cost of the procedure, and hospital stay were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

In the context of demographic characteristics, baseline HR, or MAP, no significant differences were noted between SA and GA groups. Mean anesthetic time, mean PACU time, mean doses of analgesic requirement, cost of anesthesia, and the surgeon's satisfaction was significantly lower in the SA Group (P < 0.05). The blood loss, duration of operation, and hospital stay were not significant too. No major Intra and postoperative complications were reported nor were significant differences found in either series.

CONCLUSION

Safety and efficacy of SA in comparison to GA were similar for the patients undergoing surgery on the lumbar spine. Notable advantages of SA include shorter anesthesia duration, fewer drug requirements, relative cost-effectiveness, and fewer complications rate. Successful surgery can be performed using either anesthesia type.

摘要

准实验设计

目的

比较全身麻醉(GA)和脊髓麻醉(SA)用于腰椎手术患者时的术中和术后参数、外科医生满意度以及成本效益。

文献综述

腰椎手术是所有脊柱外科手术中最常见的手术。GA和SA都被证明是安全进行该手术的合适技术。GA使用最为频繁。但是,SA越来越受欢迎,因为它允许患者自行摆放体位,从而减少了与GA在俯卧位相关的各种并发症。

方法

纳入2016年6月至2019年7月期间共64例接受1或2节段椎间盘切除术、椎板切除术或椎板间孔切开术治疗腰椎间盘突出症或椎管狭窄的患者。在研究期间,GA组和SA组各非随机选择32例患者。记录并比较心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、失血量、总麻醉时间、外科医生满意度、镇痛需求、手术费用和住院时间。

结果

在人口统计学特征、基线HR或MAP方面,SA组和GA组之间未发现显著差异。SA组的平均麻醉时间、平均麻醉后恢复室(PACU)时间、平均镇痛需求剂量、麻醉费用和外科医生满意度显著更低(P<0.05)。失血量、手术持续时间和住院时间也无显著差异。未报告重大的术中和术后并发症,两个系列中也未发现显著差异。

结论

对于接受腰椎手术的患者,SA与GA相比,安全性和有效性相似。SA的显著优点包括麻醉持续时间短、药物需求少、相对成本效益高和并发症发生率低。两种麻醉方式均可成功进行手术。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Increasing relevance of minimally invasive spinal surgery.微创脊柱手术的相关性日益增加。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 Sep 23;22:101606. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101606. eCollection 2021 Nov.

本文引用的文献

2
General versus epidural anesthesia for lumbar microdiscectomy.腰椎间盘显微切除术的全身麻醉与硬膜外麻醉对比
J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Aug;22(8):1309-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.02.018. Epub 2015 Jun 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验