Department of Orthopedics, Ningbo No. 6 Hospital, 1059 Zhongshandong Road, Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315040, People's Republic of China.
Department of Anesthesiology, Ningbo No. 6 Hospital, 1059 Zhongshandong Road, Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315040, People's Republic of China.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Oct 14;24(1):818. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06956-z.
This study aimed to report our experience with spinal anesthesia (SA) in patients undergoing L5-S1 interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) and clarify its advantages and disadvantages.
One hundred twelve patients who underwent IELD for an L5-S1 disc herniation under SA were retrospectively analyzed. SA with 0.5% ropivacaine was administered using a 27-gauge fine needle. Intraoperatively, the volume and level of SA, surgical time, blood loss, and cardiopulmonary complications were documented. Postoperative data was collected included the number of patients who ambulated on the day of surgery, incidence of complications and were then statistically analyzed.
Analgesia was complete throughout the entire operation in all patients and no other adjuvant intraoperative analgesic drugs were needed. Mean visual analog scale scores for intraoperative and early postoperative (24 h) pain were 0 and 2.43 ± 1.66. SA was administered at the L3-4 interspace in 34 patients (30.4%) and the L2-3 interspace in 78 (69.6%). Administration was successful with the first attempt in all patients. Mean operation time was 70.12 ± 6.52 min. Mean intraoperative blood loss volume was 20.71 ± 5.26 ml. Ninety-eight patients ambulated on the same day as surgery. Mean length of hospital stay was 24.36 ± 3.64 h. Dural injury without damaging the nerve root occurred in one patient. One patient experienced recurrent disc herniation. Intraoperative hypotension and respiratory distress occurred in five (4.5%) and three (2.7%) patients, respectively. Three patients (2.7%) received postoperative analgesia therapy and two (1.8%) experienced nausea. Two patients (1.8%) developed urinary retention. Spinal headache, cauda equina syndrome, and neurotoxicity did not occur.
SA can achieve satisfactory pain control for patients undergoing IELD with a low incidence of adverse events. SA may be a useful alternative to local and general anesthesia for IELD surgery. Future randomized controlled trials are warranted to investigate.
本研究旨在报告我们在接受 L5-S1 层间内镜腰椎间盘切除术(IELD)的患者中进行脊髓麻醉(SA)的经验,并阐明其优缺点。
回顾性分析了 112 例在 SA 下行 L5-S1 椎间盘突出症行 IELD 的患者。采用 27 号细针给予 0.5%罗哌卡因行 SA。术中记录 SA 的容积和水平、手术时间、出血量和心肺并发症。收集术后数据,包括当天可活动的患者数量、并发症的发生率,并进行统计学分析。
所有患者在整个手术过程中均有完全的镇痛效果,不需要其他辅助的术中镇痛药物。术中及术后早期(24 小时)疼痛的平均视觉模拟评分分别为 0 分和 2.43±1.66 分。34 例(30.4%)SA 在 L3-4 间隙进行,78 例(69.6%)在 L2-3 间隙进行。所有患者均在首次尝试时成功进行 SA。平均手术时间为 70.12±6.52 分钟。平均术中出血量为 20.71±5.26ml。98 例患者在手术当天可下地活动。平均住院时间为 24.36±3.64 小时。1 例患者发生硬膜无神经根损伤。1 例患者发生复发性椎间盘突出。术中发生低血压和呼吸困难的患者分别有 5 例(4.5%)和 3 例(2.7%)。3 例(2.7%)患者接受术后镇痛治疗,2 例(1.8%)患者出现恶心。2 例(1.8%)患者发生尿潴留。未发生脊柱头痛、马尾综合征和神经毒性。
SA 可实现对接受 IELD 患者的满意镇痛效果,不良事件发生率低。SA 可能是 IELD 手术中局部和全身麻醉的有用替代方法。需要进一步开展随机对照试验进行研究。