Qian Jiajun, Fu Yao, Wu Xiao, Xu Liu, Zhang Mengjie, Zhang Qing, Rosenberg Joel Elliot, Xu Linfeng, Qiu Xuefeng, Guo Hongqian
Department of Urology, Affiliated Drum Tower hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Institute of Urology, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Feb;10(2):538-547. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1229.
To investigate the effect of protruded median lobe (PML) on the perioperative, oncological, and urinary continence (UC) outcomes among patients underwent Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP).
231 consecutive patients who had undergone RS-RARP were collected and analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups based on the PML degree: PML<5 mm (n=99); 5≤ PML <10 mm (n=91); PML ≥10 mm (n=41). The perioperative outcomes, short-term oncological, and UC outcomes were compared among the three groups. Those outcomes were also compared in patients with significant PML (>10 mm) who underwent the traditional or Retzius-sparing RARP.
The median PML was significantly associated age (P<0.001) and prostate volume (P<0.001). Perioperative characteristics including console time, estimated blood loss (EBL), intraoperative transfusion rate, and complications were not statistically different among the three groups (P=0.647, 0.574, 0.231, 0.661, respectively). The rate of positive surgical margin (PSM) were not significantly different in the three groups (P=0.065). No significant difference regarding UC and biochemical recurrence (BCR) at 12-month follow-up was observed in the three groups (P>0.05). Comparison between the two approaches in men with significant PML showed better recovery of UC (HR =1.83, 95% CI: 1.117-3.01, log-rank P=0.002) and similar BCR (log-rank P=0.072) after RS-RARP.
RS-RARP is an oncologically and functionally equivalent approach for patients with PML. Compared with the traditional approach, RS-RARP offers benefits regarding UC for cases with significant PML.
探讨中叶突出(PML)对接受保留Retzius间隙机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RS-RARP)患者围手术期、肿瘤学及尿控(UC)结局的影响。
收集并分析231例连续接受RS-RARP的患者。根据PML程度将患者分为三组:PML<5 mm(n=99);5≤PML<10 mm(n=91);PML≥10 mm(n=41)。比较三组患者的围手术期结局、短期肿瘤学及UC结局。还比较了接受传统或保留Retzius间隙RARP的PML显著增大(>10 mm)患者的这些结局。
PML中位数与年龄(P<0.001)和前列腺体积(P<0.001)显著相关。三组患者的围手术期特征,包括控制台时间、估计失血量(EBL)、术中输血率及并发症,差异均无统计学意义(分别为P=0.647、0.574、0.231、0.661)。三组患者的手术切缘阳性率(PSM)差异无统计学意义(P=0.065)。三组患者在12个月随访时的尿控及生化复发(BCR)情况差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对PML显著增大的男性患者两种手术方式的比较显示,RS-RARP术后尿控恢复更好(HR =1.83,95%CI:1.117 - 3.01,对数秩检验P=0.002),BCR情况相似(对数秩检验P=0.072)。
对于PML患者,RS-RARP是一种在肿瘤学和功能上等效的手术方式。与传统手术方式相比,RS-RARP对于PML显著增大的病例在尿控方面具有优势。