Learning curve for imageless robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty in non-fellowship trained joint replacement surgeons.

INTRODUCTION

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) has become increasingly popular, although an associated learning curve can be a deterrent for some surgeons. Prior studies have addressed this learning curve in fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons, however the learning curve among non-fellowship-trained surgeons remains unclear. The objective of this study was to investigate the learning curve for imageless RA-TKA related to operative time and rates of complications among two non-arthroplasty-trained orthopedic surgeons.

METHODS

This retrospective case series included 200 RA-TKA consecutive cases performed by two non-arthroplasty-trained orthopedic surgeons (100 each). Cases were divided into 2 cohorts for each surgeon: the first 50 consecutive cases and the second 50 cases. These cohorts were then compared to assess for trends in each surgeon as well as in both surgeons combined. Mean operative times were compared, as were hospital length of stay, complications, readmission, and reoperations.

RESULTS

For both surgeons, the mean operative time significantly decreased from the first 50 cases to the next 50 cases (116.5 vs 108.4 min for surgeon 1,  = 0.031; 125.7 vs 109.1 min for surgeon 2,  = 0.001). No significant differences were found among length of stay, complications, readmissions, or reoperations between cohorts.

CONCLUSION

General orthopedic surgeons can expect to optimize operative time within 50 cases, while not carrying associated risks of related complications during the early learning period.