Mao Yunhe, Sun Weihao, Fu Weili, Li Jian
Department of Orthopaedics, Orthopaedics Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P.R.China.
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Mar 15;35(3):330-336. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202010044.
To investigate the effectiveness of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction combined with anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction in the treatment of revision patients with ACL graft failure.
Between January 2018 and June 2019, 15 patients underwent ACL revision with double-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with ALL reconstruction. There were 12 males and 3 females with an average age of 30.1 years (range, 17-49 years). The technique of primary ACL reconstruction included single-bundle reconstruction in 13 cases and double-bundle reconstruction in 2 cases. These reconstructions applied autografts in 14 cases and allograft in 1 case. The causes of ACL reconstruction failure were identified as traumatic rupture in 9 cases and non-traumatic failure in 6 cases, including 2 cases of graft absorption and 3 cases of graft laxity. The average time from the primary ACL reconstruction to revision was 28.5 months (range, 8-60 months). The subjective and objective indicators of knee joint function were compared before operation and at last follow-up to evaluate the effectiveness. The subjective indicators included International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, and Tegner score. The objective indicators included anterior tibial translation (dynamic and static) and side-to-side difference (SSD), pivot-shift test, Lachman test, the difference of single-legged hop test, and the loss ratio of extensor muscle strength on the affected side.
All incisions healed by first intetion, and no complications such as infection, venous thrombosis of lower extremity, or neurovascular injury occurred. All patients were followed up for an average of 19.1 months (range, 12-30 months). At last follow-up, all patients had returned to pre-injury sports level. The IKDC score, Lysholm score, and Tegner score were significantly improved ( <0.05); anterior tibial translations (dynamic and static) significantly decreased when compared with preoperative one ( <0.05) and returned to the physiological range. The SSD, Lachman test, pivot-shift test, the difference of single-legged hop test, and the loss ratio of extensor muscle strength on the affected side were significantly better than those before operation ( <0.05).During the follow-up, there was no re-rupture of the graft, no stiffness of the knee joint and limitation of mobility; 1 case had a protruding femoral end compression screw, which was removed through the original incision under local anesthesia.
Double-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with ALL reconstruction can significantly improve the knee function in revision patients with ACL graft failure. It can reduce the anterior translation of tibia, and effectively prevent postoperative rotational instability of the knee.
探讨双束前交叉韧带(ACL)重建联合外侧副韧带(ALL)重建治疗ACL移植物失败翻修患者的有效性。
2018年1月至2019年6月,15例患者接受了双束ACL重建联合ALL重建的ACL翻修手术。其中男性12例,女性3例,平均年龄30.1岁(17 - 49岁)。初次ACL重建技术包括单束重建13例,双束重建2例。这些重建中14例采用自体移植物,1例采用异体移植物。ACL重建失败的原因包括创伤性断裂9例,非创伤性失败6例,其中移植物吸收2例,移植物松弛3例。初次ACL重建至翻修的平均时间为28.5个月(8 - 60个月)。比较手术前和末次随访时膝关节功能的主观和客观指标以评估疗效。主观指标包括国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分、Lysholm评分和Tegner评分。客观指标包括胫骨前移(动态和静态)及左右差值(SSD)、轴移试验、Lachman试验、单腿跳试验差值以及患侧伸肌力量损失率。
所有切口均一期愈合,未发生感染、下肢静脉血栓或神经血管损伤等并发症。所有患者平均随访19.1个月(12 - 30个月)。末次随访时,所有患者均恢复至伤前运动水平。IKDC评分、Lysholm评分和Tegner评分显著改善(<0.05);与术前相比,胫骨前移(动态和静态)显著降低(<0.05)并恢复至生理范围。SSD、Lachman试验、轴移试验、单腿跳试验差值以及患侧伸肌力量损失率均显著优于术前(<0.05)。随访期间,移植物无再次断裂,膝关节无僵硬及活动受限;1例股骨端加压螺钉突出,在局部麻醉下经原切口取出。
双束ACL重建联合ALL重建可显著改善ACL移植物失败翻修患者的膝关节功能。它可减少胫骨前移,并有效防止术后膝关节旋转不稳。