Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy; Division of Cancer, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
Medical Oncology, St. Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.
Eur J Cancer. 2021 May;148:24-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.02.005. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
Treatment sequencing with first-line immunotherapy, followed by second-line chemotherapy, is still a viable option for NSCLC patients with PD-L1 expression ≥50%.
We evaluated post-progression treatment pathways in a large real-world cohort of metastatic NSCLC patients with PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% treated with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy.
Overall, 974 patients were included. With a median follow-up of 22.7 months (95%CI: 21.6-38.2), the median overall survival (OS) of the entire population was 15.8 months (95%CI: 13.5-17.5; 548 events). At the data cutoff, among the 678 patients who experienced disease progression, 379 (55.9%) had not received any further treatment, and 359 patients (52.9%) had died. Patients who did not receive post-progression therapies were older (p = 0.0011), with a worse ECOG-PS (p < 0.0001) and were on corticosteroids prior to pembrolizumab (p = 0.0024). At disease progression, 198 patients (29.2%) received a switched approach and 101 (14.9%) received pembrolizumab ByPD either alone (64 [9.4%]) or in combination with local ablative treatments (37 [5.5%]) (LATs). After a random-case control matching according to ECOG-PS, CNS metastases, bone metastases, and (previous) best response to pembrolizumab, patients receiving pembrolizumab ByPD plus LATs were confirmed to have a significantly longer post-progression OS compared to patients receiving pembrolizumab ByPD alone 13.9 months versus 7.8 months (p = 0.0179) 241 patients (35.5%) among the 678 who had experienced PD, received a second-line systemic treatment (regardless of previous treatment beyond PD). As compared to first-line treatment commencement, patients' features at the moment of second-line initiation showed a significantly higher proportion of patients aged under 70 years (p = 0.0244), with a poorer ECOG-PS (p < 0.0001) and having CNS (p = 0.0001), bone (p = 0.0266) and liver metastases (p = 0.0148).
In the real-world scenario NSCLC patients with PD-L1 expression ≥50% treated with first-line single-agent pembrolizumab achieve worse outcomes as compared to the Keynote-024 trial. Poor post-progression outcomes are major determinants of the global results that should be considered when counselling patients for first-line treatment choices.
对于 PD-L1 表达≥50%的 NSCLC 患者,一线免疫治疗联合二线化疗仍然是一种可行的选择。
我们评估了 PD-L1 表达≥50%的转移性 NSCLC 患者一线接受 pembrolizumab 单药治疗后,在后线治疗中的治疗路径。
共纳入 974 例患者。中位随访 22.7 个月(95%CI:21.6-38.2),全人群中位总生存期(OS)为 15.8 个月(95%CI:13.5-17.5;548 例事件)。截至数据截止日期,在 678 例疾病进展的患者中,379 例(55.9%)未接受任何进一步治疗,359 例(52.9%)患者死亡。未接受后线治疗的患者年龄较大(p=0.0011),ECOG-PS 评分较差(p<0.0001),并且在接受 pembrolizumab 治疗前使用皮质类固醇(p=0.0024)。疾病进展时,198 例(29.2%)患者采用了切换治疗策略,101 例(14.9%)患者接受了 pembrolizumab ByPD,单独使用(64 例[9.4%])或联合局部消融治疗(37 例[5.5%])(LATs)。在根据 ECOG-PS、中枢神经系统转移、骨转移和(先前)对 pembrolizumab 的最佳反应进行随机病例对照匹配后,与单独接受 pembrolizumab ByPD 的患者相比,接受 pembrolizumab ByPD 联合 LATs 的患者在后线治疗中的 OS 显著延长,分别为 13.9 个月和 7.8 个月(p=0.0179)。在 678 例发生 PD 的患者中,241 例(35.5%)接受了二线系统治疗(无论 PD 后是否接受治疗)。与一线治疗开始时相比,二线起始时患者的特征表现为年龄在 70 岁以下的患者比例显著较高(p=0.0244),ECOG-PS 评分较差(p<0.0001),并且有中枢神经系统(p=0.0001)、骨(p=0.0266)和肝转移(p=0.0148)。
在真实世界环境中,一线单药 pembrolizumab 治疗的 PD-L1 表达≥50%的 NSCLC 患者的结局较 Keynote-024 试验差。较差的后线治疗结局是影响总体结果的主要因素,在为患者提供一线治疗选择时应考虑这些因素。