Suppr超能文献

个体化截骨导板与一次性手术器械在全膝关节置换术中的优势:一项病例对照研究。

Advantages of patient-specific cutting guides with disposable instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a case control study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.

Department of Muskuloskeletal Medicine, Swiss BioMotion Lab, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Mar 15;16(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02310-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is most frequently planned using conventional two-dimensional weight-bearing lower limb radiographs and is performed with conventional femoral and tibial cutting guides. Questions have been raised about the accuracy of conventional TKA instrumentation and planning for an anatomically standard or complex joint. Use of computed tomography (CT)-based three-dimensional (3D) templating and patient-specific cutting guides printed in 3D has shown improved postoperative lower limb alignment parameters. This case-control study compared costs and operative times of using CT-based, patient-specific, single-use instruments versus conventional metal instruments for TKA.

METHODS

In this case-control, retrospective chart review, all TKAs were performed by one senior surgeon, using the F.I.R.S.T. posterior-stabilised knee prosthesis (Symbios, CH), with a similar protocol and identical operating room setup. Group A included 51 TKAs performed with patient-specific cutting guides and conventional metal instruments. Group B included 49 TKAs performed with patient-specific cutting guides and patient-specific, single-use instrumentation. Operation duration, number of instrumentation trays and sterilisation costs were evaluated.

RESULTS

The groups were similar for age, body mass index, hip-knee-ankle angle and operation duration. The mean number of instrumentation trays was 8.0 ± 0.8 for group A (controls) and 5.1 ± 0.9 for group B (p<0.001). The mean sterilisation costs were 380 ± 47 Swiss Francs (CHF) for group A and 243 ± 55 CHF for group B (p<0.001), for a mean cost reduction of 130.50 CHF per intervention in group B. The time interval between two consecutive surgeries was 24 min for group A and 18 min for group B. There were no adverse events or complications, instrument-related or otherwise.

CONCLUSION

Compared to conventional instrumentation, use of patient-specific, single-use instruments for TKA reduced the number of instrumentation trays by more than one-third and saved 36% in sterilisation costs. If fabrication costs of single-use instruments are included by the company, the total cost is significantly diminished. There was no operative time advantage for single-use instrumentation.

摘要

背景

全膝关节置换术(TKA)最常使用传统二维负重下肢 X 射线片进行规划,并使用传统的股骨和胫骨截骨导向器进行手术。对于解剖标准或复杂关节的传统 TKA 器械和规划的准确性,人们提出了疑问。使用基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的三维(3D)模板和 3D 打印的患者专用截骨导向器已显示出改善术后下肢对线参数的效果。本病例对照研究比较了使用基于 CT 的、患者专用的、一次性使用器械与传统金属器械进行 TKA 的成本和手术时间。

方法

在这项病例对照、回顾性图表审查中,所有 TKA 均由一位资深外科医生使用 F.I.R.S.T. 后稳定型膝关节假体(Symbios,CH)进行,使用相同的方案和相同的手术室设置。A 组包括 51 例使用患者专用截骨导向器和传统金属器械进行的 TKA。B 组包括 49 例使用患者专用截骨导向器和患者专用、一次性使用器械进行的 TKA。评估了手术持续时间、器械托盘数量和消毒成本。

结果

两组在年龄、体重指数、髋膝踝角和手术持续时间方面相似。A 组(对照组)的平均器械托盘数量为 8.0±0.8 个,B 组为 5.1±0.9 个(p<0.001)。A 组的平均消毒成本为 380±47 瑞士法郎(CHF),B 组为 243±55 CHF(p<0.001),B 组每例手术的平均成本降低了 130.50 CHF。A 组两次连续手术之间的时间间隔为 24 分钟,B 组为 18 分钟。没有与器械相关或其他不良事件或并发症。

结论

与传统器械相比,使用患者专用、一次性使用器械进行 TKA 可减少超过三分之一的器械托盘数量,并节省 36%的消毒成本。如果由公司承担一次性器械的制造费用,则总费用显著降低。一次性器械在手术时间方面没有优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9e3/7958711/220a558a6829/13018_2021_2310_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验