Soloff Paul H, Abraham Kristy, Ramaseshan Karthik, Burgess Ashley, Diwadkar Vaibhav A
Department of Psychiatry, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
J Psychiatr Res. 2017 May;88:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.12.016. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
Emotion dysregulation is a core characteristic of patients with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD), and is often attributed to an imbalance in fronto-limbic network function. Hyperarousal of amygdala, especially in response to negative affective stimuli, results in affective interference with cognitive processing of executive functions. Clinical consequences include the impulsive-aggression, suicidal and self-injurious behaviors which characterize BPD. Dysfunctional interactions between amygdala and its network targets have not been well characterized during cognitive task performance. Using psychophysiological interaction analysis (PPI), we mapped network profiles of amygdala interaction with key regulatory regions during a Go No-Go task, modified to use negative, positive and neutral Ekman faces as targets. Fifty-six female subjects, 31 BPD and 25 healthy controls (HC), completed the affectively valenced Go No-Go task during fMRI scanning. In the negative affective condition, the amygdala exerted greater modulation of its targets in BPD compared to HC subjects in Rt. OFC, Rt. dACC, Rt. Parietal cortex, Rt. Basal Ganglia, and Rt. dlPFC. Across the spectrum of affective contrasts, hypermodulation in BPD subjects observed the following ordering: Negative > Neutral > Positive contrast. The amygdala seed exerted modulatory effects on specific target regions important in processing response inhibition and motor impulsiveness. The vulnerability of BPD subjects to affective interference with impulse control may be due to specific network dysfunction related to amygdala hyper-arousal and its effects on prefrontal regulatory regions such as the OFC and dACC.
情绪调节障碍是边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者的核心特征,通常归因于额-边缘网络功能的失衡。杏仁核的过度唤醒,尤其是对负面情感刺激的反应,会对执行功能的认知加工产生情感干扰。临床后果包括BPD特有的冲动攻击、自杀和自我伤害行为。在认知任务执行过程中,杏仁核与其网络靶点之间的功能失调性相互作用尚未得到充分表征。我们使用心理生理交互分析(PPI),在一项经过修改的“停止信号任务”中,以负面、正面和中性的埃克曼面部表情作为目标,绘制了杏仁核与关键调节区域相互作用的网络图谱。56名女性受试者,31名BPD患者和25名健康对照(HC),在功能磁共振成像扫描期间完成了带有情感效价的“停止信号任务”。在负面情感条件下,与HC受试者相比,BPD患者的杏仁核对右侧眶额皮质(Rt. OFC)、右侧背侧前扣带回皮质(Rt. dACC)、右侧顶叶皮质、右侧基底神经节和右侧背外侧前额叶皮质(Rt. dlPFC)中的靶点具有更强的调节作用。在整个情感对比范围内,BPD受试者的过度调节呈现以下顺序:负面>中性>正面对比。杏仁核种子对处理反应抑制和运动冲动方面重要的特定目标区域发挥调节作用。BPD受试者易受情感干扰影响冲动控制,可能是由于与杏仁核过度唤醒及其对前额叶调节区域(如眶额皮质和背侧前扣带回皮质)的影响相关的特定网络功能障碍。