Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
World Neurosurg. 2021 Jun;150:e408-e419. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.03.029. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
The current treatment options for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) include burr hole drainage, twist drill drainage, and craniotomy with or without postoperative catheter drainage. Although generally effective, these treatments have continued to be complicated by recurrence, especially in partially hemolyzed or septated hematomas. Recently, interest in the use of fibrinolytic agents as an adjunct to surgical treatment to address this limitation has been increasing. We conducted a systematic review, focusing on the efficacy and safety profile of fibrinolytic agents and compared the different fibrinolytic agents.
The PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for trials relevant to fibrinolytic administration in the treatment of CSDH. The findings are reported in accordance with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines. The data from 1702 subjects from 6 retrospective observational studies were qualitatively analyzed. In addition, we included 11 case series and reports for discussion.
For 1449 patients, the use of urokinase or tissue plasminogen activator improved hematoma drainage and shortened the hospital stay (7.04 days), with an overall hematoma recurrence rate of 1.59%. The incidence of infection, seizure, and intracranial bleeding was 3.18%, 0.80%, and 0.41%, respectively, which compared favorably with previously reported findings for surgical drainage without the use of fibrinolytic agents.
The routine use of intrathecal urokinase and tissue plasminogen activator could be a new direction in the management of CSDH. Conclusive clinical evidence is lacking, however, and further prospective controlled studies are warranted to confirm the benefit and safety of this treatment strategy and to identify the optimal agent and dosing regimen.
慢性硬脑膜下血肿(CSDH)的当前治疗选择包括颅骨钻孔引流、旋转钻孔引流和开颅术,无论是否术后导管引流。尽管这些治疗方法通常有效,但血肿部分溶解或分隔时,仍会继续出现复发等并发症。最近,人们对使用纤维蛋白溶解剂作为手术治疗的辅助手段来解决这一局限性的兴趣日益增加。我们进行了一项系统评价,重点关注纤维蛋白溶解剂的疗效和安全性,并比较了不同的纤维蛋白溶解剂。
检索了与纤维蛋白溶解剂给药治疗 CSDH 相关的试验,检索了 PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL Plus 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库。结果按照 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南进行报告。对来自 6 项回顾性观察性研究的 1702 名受试者的数据进行了定性分析。此外,我们还纳入了 11 个病例系列和报告进行讨论。
对于 1449 例患者,使用尿激酶或组织型纤溶酶原激活剂可改善血肿引流并缩短住院时间(7.04 天),总体血肿复发率为 1.59%。感染、癫痫发作和颅内出血的发生率分别为 3.18%、0.80%和 0.41%,与未使用纤维蛋白溶解剂的手术引流的先前报道结果相比,这一结果较为有利。
鞘内使用尿激酶和组织型纤溶酶原激活剂可能是 CSDH 治疗的新方向。然而,目前缺乏确凿的临床证据,需要进一步开展前瞻性对照研究,以证实这种治疗策略的益处和安全性,并确定最佳的药物和剂量方案。